Ayh am not dumb enough to not see that as an oxymoron :)
If we did apply statistical information to power outages and EMP or EMP similiar disruptions, 99.9% of them favor not solar but instead human manufactured events. Thus aym statistically favoring a local event (DARPA?) as opposed to seeing every thing go black and an aurora overhead.
We haven't had neither for a long time. So sampling says : high uncertainty, non-calculable probability (or too wide bracket to be meaningful). Learn the difference. I suggest you take some math classes.
Ayh am not dumb enough to not see that as an oxymoron :)
If we did apply statistical information to power outages and EMP or EMP similiar disruptions, 99.9% of them favor not solar but instead human manufactured events. Thus aym statistically favoring a local event (DARPA?) as opposed to seeing every thing go black and an aurora overhead.
We haven't had neither for a long time. So sampling says : high uncertainty, non-calculable probability (or too wide bracket to be meaningful). Learn the difference. I suggest you take some math classes.
Ayh did --> geometry. Engineering is life. Stats, calc, diffs, are for desperate copers poisoning civilization with theoreticals.