Graphene - what is it doing in mRNA vaccines?
(odysee.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Graphene is diamagnetic. Like copper or bismuth.
Graphene oxide is paramagnetic, like aluminium or platinum.
Paramagnetic is barely react to magnetic field. Diamagnetic is pushed out from magnetic field. None of both, even in pure form could hold any available magnet, not even talking about some sparse particles in amount of micrograms.
It is ferromagnetics that could be attracted by magnets with significant force.
So, magnetic properties of mRNA jab spot could be proof of some ferromagnetic, like iron, cobalt, nickel or rare-earth alloys like iron or cobalt with addition of neodymium or samarium in a jab, but in no way it could be a proof of presence of grapthene or graphene oxide.
Does it really matter what bullshit you stick to - that jabs are "safe and effective" or that jabs "have tons of graphene, 5G receivers, WiFi8 routers and bluetooth controlled laser nanomachines"?
I don't see any difference, really. It's all just ignorance and dnial of knowledge.
PS: does anybody know why exactly such hillarious failure like graphene had been choosen as scarecrow for idiots? No material on the Eart ever had such enormous expectations and marketing bullshit along with total absence of any real usefulness for over 150 years? And don't even try to talk about some Super-Absorbing Nanotecnology Vacuum Cleaner Exhaust Filter with Graphene Nanotubes Coating you bought online, which is really just cheap chineese paper filter slightly powdered with charcoal powder.
I think graphene was a controlled op narrative to distract from what could really be in there.
You mentioned iron. There have been studies on ferritin proteins which attach to targeted regions of the brain to be activated magnetically https://www.theguardian.com/science/neurophilosophy/2016/mar/24/magneto-remotely-controls-brain-and-behaviour. This seems like the most likely approach rather than some futuristic cyborg technology.
Let's imagine that we have some foreign particles in bloodstrem.
Overall, this particles either will be attacked by leukocytes, either will be left intact if they are chemically passive. In any case, most of them will end in liver, which have a function of blood filter for our body, and later will be extorted with bile.
If particles are magnets by itself, they will not be able to form suspension in a not-a-vaccine and will qickly stick to each other in a vial into single blob, long before an injection.
So, to show effect declared in video, particles should be ferromagnetic, but not magnetized and be too small to be able to form a suspension. This will make not-a-vaccine kind of very low density magnetic liquid
What could be a purpose of injection of magnetic liquid into human body? I have no any idea, really. Theoretically, this ferromagnetic particles could create some mess in body (in liver?) in case of taking MRI scan, since very powerful magnets are in use. IDK, not-a-vaccine produce miocarditis in person, person took MRI scan, ferromagnetic particles damage liver in addition to heart, or do that stuff mentioned in article you linked?
Articles mentioned in your link tell about using very strong magnets near the sample, and apart MRI scans, only known case when strong magnets was used on jabbed is, suddenly, only that "jab spot is magnetic!" videos. Kind of strange, isn't it?
Another option is a probability that some ferromagnetic particles will end in hearing circuit of human. Then, if they will settle in the right place, one could kind of hear long-wave AM broadcasts. You could remember that ferrite core antennas in old radios.Something like that in smaller variant. Voices in your head, yes. But to use that for some bad things you have to transmit powerful AM broadcast over long-waves. And it will be easily received also by anybody with AM receiver. Of course AM as broadcast media is nearly extinct today, only few stations is alive. But since AM band is empty, it attracted attention of amateurs who often experiment in it. There are still a lot of very vigilant hams around who will notice weird transmissions and publish them on their forums. But I didn't see any reports about weird transmissions in AM band apart traditional reports about "number stations".
All in all, I don't see anything that could be useful enough for malisious actors to run such a complex project like coronahoax just to inject ferromagnetic particles into population. And even as side-effect it does not have any sense.
I could only suppose that the whole jab thing was a broad test of a lot of different compositions on a very large sampling to find something useful for elites by banal bruteforce method. That is why too many too different side effects from different not-a-vaccines batches we observe. Some random batches of not-a-vaccine could have also ferromagnetic particles as part of bruteforce try.
I imagine it would be something transmitted from a cell phone that everyone carries. Or something in the towers. I don't think a potential voice transmission is limited to the AM frequency bands. For example V2K is microwave frequency. Not that I'm an expert in the subject, but I realize there is a lot that can be done with frequencies.
I can't speak to most of your points, I know very little about the pharmacokinetics of these types of materials or what delivery systems they could be using to bypass normal metabolism. Also the question about interaction with an MRI machine is worth thinking about.
Good suggestion, but ferromagnetic antennas are not good at receiving anything high-frequency. And gadgets and cell towers does not have antennas suitable for long-wave transmission.
If you want go this way, I'll suggest using power lines as long-wave antennas to interfere with ferromagnetic particles in jabbed people. At least power lines is only existing infrastructure that is more or less suitable for transmitting signals as long-wave antennas.
It will be interesting to check power line voltage for 100kHz-5MHz low frequency noise/signal on top of 50/60 sine wave. AM long-wave signal could be injected in local power lines at local substations.
If there was any suspicious upgrades/repairs on power line substations or appearence of strange equipment on power line poles just before or during coronahoax, it could be interesting to check what exactly was replaced/installed.
In this case it is limited with properties of ferromagnetic particles as ferromagnetic antennas. At any frequences higner than few MHz, ferromagnetic antenna have extremely poor efficiency. That is why any multi-band portable radio from the past had ferromagnetic antenna for long-wave AM and telescopic one for short-wave bands. Vintage tube radios had a socket to connect external antenna on the back, and for long/mid-wave bands you need a piece of long wire of at least several meters.
Also, oxide layer on particle could be used as detector diode for demodulating carrier signal and turning it to something meaningful, f.e. "voice".
IDK, I think theory about not-a-vaccine ferromagnetic particles for receiving long/mid-wave AM signals in attempt to induce "voices in head" in subjects using some devices at power line substations that inject AM long/mid-wave signal into power lines looks more logical, consecutive and rational than all that "magnets stick to graphene in jab" shit. And it doesn't need any magic of non-existing technologies, easy to implement and could be falsified by checking power line voltage and equipment on substations.
Also strange that this simple theory does not pop up after that "magnetic jabs" videos. Well, it is not so entertaining, quasi-scientific and fashionable as "5G WiFi6 router nanomachines", but why the hell not a single take on "power lines, AM and ferromagnetics" at all?
PS: Why the hell nearly everything suspicious today have to be connected with smartphones, cell towers (5G only, looks like 3G/4G are fine), some overhyped substances and AI? Just like somebody who wrote marketing articles for corporations switched to creating "conspiracy theories". :)
I can speak to 5G being alarming. It is in part because the push for it was done with such zealotry it raised suspicions. If you look at the way former FCC chairman Tom Wheeler promoted it, you'd think it was the second coming. https://www.bitchute.com/video/9LZph9TJxGrm/
Many of us sense some real dark energy there, and I'm sure as a more rational technology minded person that might seem like woo to you.
But beyond what Mr. Wheeler says himself being creepy and zealtous, the fact an FCC chairman is giving any speeches pushing a technology is bizarre. The FCC is supposed to be a regulatory agency, not a cheerleader for industry.
Beyond that is the skipping of any safety testing for these new frequency bands. Again it is oddly reckless and zealous. And given the fact we know these elites want to depopulate the planet, this apparent recklessness should be a concern.
I see you're well versed on radio transmission technology and I'm learning something. Though I think there are still too many assumptions made about the injected technology to say anything definitively. Can we be sure they are using something ferromagnetic, or is it paramagnetic? Is it iron based or is it something else? Perhaps it is something novel and tuned to a microwave frequency which 5G can interact with. Perhaps not. Too many unknowns in the equations, but I don't discount your theory at all. Maybe they use something people aren't expecting, like AM frequencies.
Problem with 5G interacting with anything inside human body is in a skin effect and size of antenna.
Skin effect depth for conductive non-ferromagnetic object more than 503sqrt(ρ/f) meters where ρ is specific resistance of object, and f is frequency. For 2.6GHz and human body tissue around 1 Ωm it is around 0.01 meter or 1cm or less than half inch. For FR2 band at 30GHz it will be 3mm or 1/8 inch. RF strength inside conductive object drops exponentially with depth. Skin effect depth show where RF signal reach 70% loss.
Antenna with a good performance need minimum size of quarter of wavelength. For 2.6GHz it is 25mm or inch. For 30MHz it is 2.25mm. Smaller antenna, of injectable size will have much worse performance if any.
So, skin effect and antenna size limitation does not allow anything 5G work deeper than half inch, or even less.
Since nobody care about 3G/4G working at exactly same frequences as 5G FR1, and no high-bandwith necessary for that nanoshit, we should conclude that they definitely tell about 5G FR2 - this is only difference here. So, it is around 30GHz with 1/8inch penetration into human body.
It does not make any sense at all. What could be a purpose of injecting some 5G nanoshit you will not be able to talk to inside human body?
From the other side, long/mid-wave RF is perfectly penetrate whole human body. You could calculate skin effect depth for frequencies around 200kHz or 1MHz using above formula.
But somehow low frequency RF that is perfectly suitable for connection with something inside human is completely out of scope of that 5G/nanoshit crowd. Is it just too outdated and boring for those who create all that 5G/nanoshit bullshit? Do they suppose that target audience will not be catched with something from times of tube radios, so there is a need to add something fashionable and hypish for better marketing?
I don't know, it is kind of huge swindle right before your eyes nobody dare to see.
How could it be completely unnoticed? And this 5G/nanoshit crap is nicely poisons both wells - any sane suspicions about 5G threats (they are really in bandwith, not health or whatever) and coronahoax/vaccinehoax exposing.
You lose me when you completely deny health effects. That's typical of RF engineers. You guys know so much about the engineering side you feel like you know everything. How many studies have you looked through on the effects of microwaves on human cells and systems? No matter how many you've read there are hundreds more. It's a deep subject area .
The military is on record as using microwaves for various types of weapons and the government admits that such weapons exist to make people sick (see Havana Syndrome).
So you aren't going to get me to let my guard down about 5G, but nice try :)
My opinion is this has been used to devalue the OG 5G conspiracy, which the FAA took very seriously, since it also interfered with planes landing equipment.
Also, your body requires combining certain vitamins, and minerals for a nutritious diet to be properly absorbed into the system. In the same manner women shouldn't drink soda because the carbonation leaches calcium from their bones. What you described sounds like an easy way to cause malnutrition. Aka weakened immune systems.
Make a no battery home radio, tune it to an AM band then listen to it with no power source to see how strong AM radio waves are with no amplification. (You should still be able to hear it just fine) Then you will realize how metal which resonates at specific frequencies is a bad idea to inject into your blood. Also remember AM Radio bands are on the weaker end of the radio spectrum and by law those radio towers have to be at the "Lowest wattage possible to complete the transmission".
Exactly. That is why idea of using ferromagnetic particle as simpliest possible long-wave receiver to work inside human body could be valid. Such receiver in correct place could create "voices in head". Some occasional proofs that it works was documented in history, f.e. when one subject got teeth stop containing metal powder as filler, he began to hear broadcasts from nearby AM station, received and demodulated by his teeth and then sneaked into nervous system. This created effect of "voices in head".
Not at all. long/mid-wave AM transmitters have to be very powerful to reach good coverage. Exactly because AM is at the weaker end of spectrum. To deliver noticeable energy to remote receiver you need a lot of power at transmitter. Check wattage of real AM stations of the past.
You seem to be venting about something.
Can you show any proof of your claims? Just a single one. You never show proof of your long comments, but I will be patient to wait for a single proof for your claims. I'll wait.
What proof you need again? That magnets do not stick to copper or aluminium? :) :) :)
Well, if you demand some proofs for that, being pefectly able to check it yourself in a seconds, this is a proof that you are either some brainless NPC who believe anything you stick to, either just intentionally pushing some agenda.
Graphene becomes a superconductor, therefore, a magnet.
Source - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity
First. Graphene is one of the worst superconductors, because it shows superconductivity only at around 2°K or -271°C
Second. Superconductors are fucking repelling from magnets! You could not fucking stick a magnet to a superconductor because it will heavily resist that and run away from your magnet.
But your video clearly shows that people try stick a magnet to a supposed graphene contaminated jab spot.
Do you understand how ridiculous and ignorant you are?
PS: It is especially funny taking in account that in childhood we show "magic trick" of sticking a teaspoon somewhere on body. Well, it sticks to body parts, really and could stay sticked for a while. Especially succesfull this trick become after you jumped, run around, do all that insane kids things and become a little sweaty. :)
That's literally from the same source I sent earlier.
Yes, not as much as a chatbot that is unable to read wiki.
So what? How is it connected to graphene? Do you understand that it is exact reason of why superconductors repelled from magnets, not stick to them?
Where in your video shown that jab iself or jabbed person show repelling from magnets? I though that video try to convince us that jab spot pulled to magnet, not vice versa. :)
I literally quoted how EM radiation is saved in superconductors from the link I've already sent. They attract magnets, not repel them. I don't know who are you trying to confuse with this nonsense... Are you banking on people that give up reading after the first sentence?
I hope other people are not as crazy as you are. Oh, now I get your username... :D
There is no graphene in vacvines.
Here's a source that you check specifically for graphene in vaccines, because I know you haven't watched the video.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33829677/
Did you even read what you posted? this is research, not actual application.
It's used as a carrier.
Is it spooky to you or something?
Lots of scary sounding chemical ingredients.