5G is the same frequency, and wavelength as Military Weapons.
(www.globalresearch.ca)
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Most phone carriers use branding, not physics.
No, it is; he’s just a shill spamming lies.
You can use 4G, LTE, and 4G LTE as an example. All of that was just one up bullshitery. Physics isn't changing. Ma Bell had original studies showing the size of the wavelength used for 5G is bad for the human body. ( that's decades before the carriers bought the band)
IEEE is about standards, not labels to the customers. The US has not implemented 5G at the intensity, or with the safety gap the UK has. This is the issue the FAA had with the FCC.
https://futurenetworks.ieee.org/tech-focus/june-2017/standards-for-5g-and-beyond
Again, 4G as the example... You can prove it with the materials that come with your device. 5G isn't allowed near airports, you can proved that with your address. As well as the material that come with your device.
I have at&t, and I can look at my phone to see it says LTE. Not even a +. What your carrier is telling your device to say means noting it the towers around you aren't equipped / haven't been upgraded.
Translation: I have no fucking clue what 5G even is and am spamming lies to poison the well.
Just wait until you find out about Kinetic Energy and how it is used by the military!
It's in the article.
https://www.sdxcentral.com/5g/definitions/what-is-5g/what-is-5g-spectrum/
So, FR1 is not different from 3G/4G and FR2 is not different from one used in microwave radars to open sliding doors in gas stations and supermarkets.
So then, why only 5G is a harmful "weapon", but not all that door openers and 3G/4G base stations/phones nobody care about?
If you can't read the materials, there's no discussion to be had.
So, you can't answer that simple question after sharing article you liked. Then, obviously, you either didn't read article you shared, either could not understand it.
What's the point then? What's the point of sharing articles you didn't read or don't understand? You even not able to discuss the points of that article, but insist on everybody reading it.
First, I read the article, and the article that compliments it because I find this topic interesting. I do not find you, and your gotcha stupid questions worth anyone's time. Not even your own.
If you have a question from the article, ask it. If you think I'm writing you a fucking essay because you can't take the time to read an article... You think wrong. If you think I can be nagged into writing you an essay, wrong again.
You wasted your time with me. Go learn something, or go find another topic if this one doesn't suit you.
So, it is "inapropriate" to question "alt"-media articles or those who share them. Especially "inapropriate" to ask exact and specific technical questions on the matter.
OK. Interesting. Where could I already saw that "don't question us" shit? With exactly same fearmongering and promises of worldwide disaster. Could it be that the source is exactly the same?
You said that, not me. Stop wasting my time.
Edit : YOU clearly didn't read the article, or you would have something to say about the pulsing functionality of 5G vs your bullshit. Don't complain to others that you don't understand the materials when you don't take time to read them.
That’s not going to be even remotely true at all.
Read the material, and tell me which part you disagree with. This current comment is, " No it's noooot!".
Truth isn’t a matter of agreement. They’re not going to allow civilian signals to interfere with their weaponry. Period. It’s just mental illness to suggest this. It’s already a fucking felony to broadcast on any radio wave spectrums restricted to military communications. Because they don’t want their meat puppets getting in the way of their control over them. It’s ludicrous to claim the exact opposite for the exact same situation.
Your mental illness seems to have forgotten that 5G interferes with plane landing equipment. Run along, and read those reports. If you have an part of the article you take issue with, bring it to my attention. Otherwise you are still, " No it's noooot!", and no one has time for that.
Neat, thanks for admitting that I’m correct. Fuck off, dipshit. Weapons don’t work if you let hundreds of millions of people interfere with them.
Since you haven't read the material, you have no argument.
Muted.
Thanks for admitting that you’re posting purposeful lies and you are incapable of refuting anything I said. You are incapable of censoring me or defending your own argument.
Was 4G already supposed to kill us all?
4G was supposed to be magical, and then the IOT just pissed everyone off.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/5g-danger-13-reasons-5g-wireless-technology-will-be-a-catastrophe-for-humanity/5680503
Can you explain in your own words why this is bad, if true?
https://pdfcoffee.com/targetted-individuals-open-letter-from-barrie-trower-pdf-free.html
If they can do shit like this, why wouldnt they? I know it sounds crazy but I often think of west/east berlin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung
How do we know this shit isnt happening today?
I keep telling myself that what happened to me was simply about money, but I dont know if I believe that. People think I am crazy when I say I was poisoned and denied help and had the entire thing covered up.
Its literally easier for people to believe that I am completely bonkers, it doesnt matter what evidence I provide if people dont want to look.
You know, getting poisoned was one thing, being denied the help was another. It was WCB trying to treat me like I was delusional that really burns me. Pure evil.
Anyway. if you read that Zersetzung entry. One of the methods they use was denying people medical help. And then trying to convince them they were crazy.
I know my phone is still routed through the uk ministry of defence. So im definitely being spied on, is it crazy to think that maybe I was intentionally poisoned? The company that poisoned me is shady all in itself, fucking Appliance Recycling Centers of America.
I think its a possibility, and considering there are what, trillions in missing funds, god knows what they are doing with that money.
Let's not forget the Internet of Bodies
https://www.rand.org/about/nextgen/art-plus-data/giorgia-lupi/internet-of-bodies-our-connected-future.html
The part of the article about the wavelength ricocheting inside the human anatomy isn't very healthy either.
No, it can’t. It blocks you if you do.
If you have a question from the article, please ask. I don't do book reports for people too lazy to read an article.
Great.
That's not a quote from me. You just intentionally participated in disinformation.
It's not my fault you don't understand what you're talking about, lady.
Your comment was in bad faith, yet I still gave you the benefit of the doubt. There is now no doubt. Your comments are in bad faith. Read the article, or have a nice night.
I NEVER do pop quizzes
You started out hyper defensive, insulting me. Glad I'm not the only one here calling you out, cunt.
I was, and remain intent that you comment to the material.
The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you. Eat shit, shill. Your entire post is disinformation.