5G is the same frequency, and wavelength as Military Weapons.
(www.globalresearch.ca)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
So, FR1 is not different from 3G/4G and FR2 is not different from one used in microwave radars to open sliding doors in gas stations and supermarkets.
So then, why only 5G is a harmful "weapon", but not all that door openers and 3G/4G base stations/phones nobody care about?
If you can't read the materials, there's no discussion to be had.
So, you can't answer that simple question after sharing article you liked. Then, obviously, you either didn't read article you shared, either could not understand it.
What's the point then? What's the point of sharing articles you didn't read or don't understand? You even not able to discuss the points of that article, but insist on everybody reading it.
First, I read the article, and the article that compliments it because I find this topic interesting. I do not find you, and your gotcha stupid questions worth anyone's time. Not even your own.
If you have a question from the article, ask it. If you think I'm writing you a fucking essay because you can't take the time to read an article... You think wrong. If you think I can be nagged into writing you an essay, wrong again.
You wasted your time with me. Go learn something, or go find another topic if this one doesn't suit you.
So, it is "inapropriate" to question "alt"-media articles or those who share them. Especially "inapropriate" to ask exact and specific technical questions on the matter.
OK. Interesting. Where could I already saw that "don't question us" shit? With exactly same fearmongering and promises of worldwide disaster. Could it be that the source is exactly the same?