Heyyyy its the pedophile-in-training.
How many times did you jerk your sad dick off to totally o-kay drawings of naked little girls today? You scumbag fuck.
For me, I tend to notice people who espect an essay while I'm multitasking on my phone. Even my typos being pointed out make me roll my eyes.
But, your first example I would like to point out can make people say something they didn't intend to by attempting to elaborate on a topic they aren't at expert level. That's the big Red Flag to me. This IS NOT the same as disagreeing with someone.
The Arlington, VA home bomber is a great example. The man didn't have the technical vocabulary to say, " WFH didn't use the correct privacy, or security protocols. This left people vulnerable on their home network". He tried, and his point was clear to myself, and another I read his words aloud to. But, he was clearly speaking on a topic he had only a brief understanding, and used the word, " DNA" with some rambling that was used to call him names.
If anyone that reads this can post that article, ty. That's exactly what the first example it attempting to do to you. This is entirely different than us arguing between ourselves, it's malicious.
We need a list of shills: Vpnsurfer Ep0ch XxxRDTPRNxxX
How to recognize shill behavior?
The PDF.
The Site (supplied by a fellow researcher).
I NEVER link here off-site, but that downloaded perfectly. Ty!
Fishyfag was caught doing this shit fyi, he needs to be globally banned.
Heyyyy its the pedophile-in-training. How many times did you jerk your sad dick off to totally o-kay drawings of naked little girls today? You scumbag fuck.
Acknowledge your perverted fetish here for everyone to see. The loli drawings of the under-tens.
...says 2y/o account with less than a dozen comments
Did you use a picture of the text? It's unzoomable. Probably operator error on my end somewhere.
It's zoomable for me. Probably just your end.
Probably
https://media.conspiracies.win/post/lP3A8QPzAxcM.png
Thanks.
For me, I tend to notice people who espect an essay while I'm multitasking on my phone. Even my typos being pointed out make me roll my eyes.
But, your first example I would like to point out can make people say something they didn't intend to by attempting to elaborate on a topic they aren't at expert level. That's the big Red Flag to me. This IS NOT the same as disagreeing with someone.
The Arlington, VA home bomber is a great example. The man didn't have the technical vocabulary to say, " WFH didn't use the correct privacy, or security protocols. This left people vulnerable on their home network". He tried, and his point was clear to myself, and another I read his words aloud to. But, he was clearly speaking on a topic he had only a brief understanding, and used the word, " DNA" with some rambling that was used to call him names.
If anyone that reads this can post that article, ty. That's exactly what the first example it attempting to do to you. This is entirely different than us arguing between ourselves, it's malicious.
Kind of looks like either a bot with standard format responses or a psycho disrupter. My money is on bot.
looks like that any time a flat earth threat pops up
He's a hasbara shill. Just ignore him.
this tells me everything
double points