JK Rowling is managed by an Israel lobbyist
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
There's really a lot to be sorted out as regards JK Rowling. Anyone interested in such should look through this:
The Great Harry Potter Hoax (5/15/2016 15-page PDF)
Yes, it's by Miles Mathis, disinfo, caveat, etc, etc.
Mathis was, for several years, one of the hardest-hitting truth-tellers out there by far.
Shocking stuff: the OJ murders and trial were faked, the Manson murders faked, Titanic sinking faked, Stephen Hawking replaced with a body double, Tupac murder faked, Monica Lewinsky scandal faked, John Lennon still alive, Lincoln assassination faked, it went on and on. He unearthed stacks of evidence from the public record, stuff you've never heard of before but that anyone could validate for themselves.
Then he started getting more into genealogical research, and then linking various public figures into the British aristocracy. It all came with increasingly high-octane speculation and the assertion of "facts" that you would have a very hard time verifying, if you cared to.
It ended up with papers along the lines of, "Everything's fake, and everyone involved is secretly a gay Jewish actor and member of the aristocracy." Very little hard evidence and I jumped ship August 2019 after his paper saying the Space Shuttle program was faked. The last time I saw someone link to him, it was his paper saying the Maui fires were faked because some pictures were suspiciously grainy.
His output was always incredibly (unbelievably) high and I'm certain that's because "Miles" was actually a writing team. I had a direct interaction with him an another forum that tipped his hand to that effect.
With any disinfo agent, they have to give you some truth to sell their lies, and deep truths came out of there like a firehose for a long time. So the old stuff is a gold mine, and actually quite solid, but it's surrounded by a minefield. You just have to keep your critical thinking faculties engaged.
PS: Weirdly, his first paper about the JFK assassination being faked--which I didn't get to for a long time--was a bunch of BS. Strange thing to come out of the gate with.
You know, one last thing I'd offer, sort of a "second order" point:
When I was deep into reading Mathis' material, I actually came across a couple of "exposes" of him as a disinfo agent, and at least one of them I read through. But I distinctly remember thinking at the time, "What a bunch of bullshit, but then of course 'They' are going to have to at least try to discredit the guy."
Fast-forward several years and I realize, "Oh shit, guess those dudes were right."
But my point is not about Mathis, it's about me and anyone else that fancies themself a disciplined critical thinker. I really learned that, fuck, it's even harder than I thought... lol
One would always like to just neatly put everyone into one category or the other, but with many of them it's just not so simple.
Like with Makow, when I first went to his site for a few articles, I saw all the other stuff about Satanic this and that and thought, "What a loon!" Fast-forward a number of years, and I think, "Well, he's dead on and way out in front on both the Jews and Satanists." But he believes the Holocaust was real, though, so I tend to think that maybe everybody can have a blind spot.
As to Corbett, I've only recently come to the conclusion that he's a very deep cover disinfo agent, and they waited until the start of the Ukraine War to activate him on certain subjects.
A couple of months into it, he was talking about the war and I thought, "Where is he getting his info? Strictly from the front pages of NYT and WaPo?" There's no way a careful researcher could possibly just subscribe completely to the mainstream narrative on anything. He also turns out to be a "Never Trumper", no shades of gray at all.
I finally figured out what his disinfo angle was, and I'm sort of ashamed it took me so long. He's sort of a stenographer, just collating, arranging, and presenting material you could find yourself on r/conspiracy easily enough. No secrets are actually revealed, no insights. He's a "conspiracy theorist" without theories.
It finally clicked near the end of his last show, "The Great Travel Reset". He spends 35 minutes talking about material the Elites have published themselves about the subject, then ends with this very snide (in my opinion) rant about people asking him for a 2-minute summary on the topic. "If you want that, go to TikTok. I hope you can find that person, that person is not me. That's not what I do on the Corbett Report, okay?"
But hang on, wasn't that exactly his entree into all this? Isn't his best known video literally a 5-minute summary of 911, a very complex topic? Is it really believable that he lacks that much self-awareness? Not in my opinion.
Which might go a long way in explaining why Rowling seemed to lose control of her product's narrative after voicing some objections.
Every billionaire is either a Jew or has a Jew assigned to them.
The Freemason connections rocketed her stuff to the top when the writing was, at best, 7 or 8 our of 10.
https://twitter.com/Lowkey0nline/status/1711796052590825975