Most men aren’t going to get into marriage if they risk their wife running of with Jaquan and taking the whole house, half your bank account, your peloton and any luxury transport items you own for example if you’re wealthy enough to own a plane or yacht. She gets that.
In America at least no divorced woman will ever experienced financial hardship but the man will be working at 76 to pay alimony for the parasite that’s now married again.
In France a divorced man is required to leave his ex wife and the kids that have not seen him since she got full custody in his will Disgusting! Divorce is sin so the woman who initiates it should be in prison not living a life of luxury at the expense of her milked ex.
A woman who initiates a divorce is a whore.
Ban those who initiate divorce!
Bingo. Jews created the feminist movement of the 1970s to create divorce culture for whites. They know that that nuclear family is the best defense against their propaganda, indoctrination, and degeneracy.
Divorce works similar in Israel IIRC. They automatically get half of the man’s shit no matter what, even if the woman makes more. So hard to really blame them for it. I would say it was more of a Lawyer conspiracy than a religious one.
Marriage doesn't become okay with God just because it becomes okay with Caesar. All the jews did was punish the manipulable secularists. Punish the... hmmm.... goyim.
If partial (life) within whole (inception towards death); then divided (divorce) as life and united in death (marriage). To distract one from this...others suggest a matrimonial bond (binding together), while ignoring that the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) continues to divert (divorce) those living within.
In other words...want to hold onto (life) within need to let go of (inception towards death) aka "till death do us apart". The many ignore that one can only live (growth) within the process of dying (loss), which permits a chosen few to exploit the shit out of temporary growth within ongoing loss.
Ones consent to suggested theism (the) permits others (jews) to shape laws (legalize), while oneself willingly ignores natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Suggested laws tempts one how to "behave", perceivable (natural) law implies one "having to be" responsive - adaptive - reactive - resistance.
Ban divorce = agree. I would also like to add that if you are divorced and share custody with your ex, if you leave the state you forfeit visitation rights. Edit- except in certain cases, like cheating or turning into a tranny. Unfortunately that's a thing and the victims are called trans-widows. Maybe ban no fault divorce?
Can you speak properly.
Protestants caused divorce to become stature. Henry the VIII.
But divorce really became spread in women's rights. Working, voting. Although it was the destruction of religion. By the rise of the TV, becoming the popstar, and the celebrity. Until today matrimony lasts a very bad average. Western culture is the worst in the World. So is its home ownership.
Hippies, killed marriage. That era, the average dropped, until today it last for about 5 years. Celebs about 3.
Jews as a demographic have very high matrimonial status. The same with many orthodox religions.
Full blown retard in here. Never seen so many mongos. Everything is a jewspiracy.
China has terrible marital status today as well.
I am down voting retard topics now. I won't down vote users. But if your dumb fucking topics are as dumb as this, or they're fucktard autistics memes; They're getting DVs. Get an education or use Google. Sick of this crap being posted by retards from Reddit.
Oh that's rich coming from you, lol. Don't forget the question mark.
Oh it's another idiot using a multiple account. Thoughts more was rich. Until you niggered it.
No, it's not on my smartphone menu. Why should I find it for that post.
Seriously, is english your second language? I've seen you write coherently before, but most of the time it is almost gibberish. Do you share your account with someone capable of better sentence structure, or do you just have multiple personalities struggling to take the wheel?
Thought is more. Some fucking nerve. Or did you just struddle out the random keyboard from a novel turned computer game. I know your other account it's obvious. I know your other account as well. No point, you'd deny it. I see you. All of you. You're a multiple account. You keep making them and they're as dumb and ridiculous as your last attempts. It's your lack of any experience and upbringing and common sense. Shit for stupid for shit. You lack in depth. The depth you provide. Go on read it. It wasn't topical. It didn't debate. It trolled because so fun making multiple accounts. Like another shit for stupid Redditor.
You're that fucking dumb little kid, thinking they're so clever for being a dumb little kid. Creating another account to fucking taunt. It says the same shit. Grammar police. Who does that. Most can read English fine and are permissible. Not that dumb little kid. It thinks it's so funny being a dumb little kid.
Grow up you sad cunt. You have no brains and right away you give away your stupid little tells.
Thought is more than what? Seriously, complete a damn sentence. At least we would take you seriously if you could make proper sentences. I'm not even trying to insult you (much), I'm giving you constructive criticism.
You're a dumb fucking cunt. Read your name. Where did it come from.
You're giving nothing least of all any intelligence like the origin of your name. Dumbass
See, that was a lot better. Well done!
Why would you use Google
Protesting something implies that something caused the protest, hence affecting those protesting.
Choosing to vote for representatives: to work for an employer, and to submit to rightful laws implies RELIGIO - "to bind anew" aka one binding self by consent to the suggestions of another.
This bond tempts one to ignore that nature sets each one "free" (will of choice) to react; respond; adapt...or ignore.
a) AV'ERAGE, noun - "in commerce, a contribution to a general loss"...loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life).
b) CONTRIBUTE, verb - "to grant, assign, or impart"...growth (life) implies partial within whole loss (inception towards death).
c) being one implies tribute (bestowed by all; divided into ones); other ones imply ones tribe (distinct descendant from same progenitor).