b) being implies one apart from one another...others suggest togetherness (collectivism) as the inversion thereof. Why? To distract one with others from self; which permits a suggesting few to collectivize a consenting many.
c) mind/memory is fueled by impressing force aka inspiration aka IN (being within) SPIRIT (to breathe; react to origin) ATION (action; enacted upon).
Being implies reaction (choice) within action (balance aka momentum of motion)...choosing to react to suggestions by others tempts one to ignore that, hence binding self aka adjure (to bind by oath) to another aka con-spire.
I think it's worth considering that introducing Israeli animosity into the conversation would play into Albert Pike's description of WWIII and it's goals. Perhaps this is part of taking down the present nationalistic power structures.
In other words, implying that the Hamas FF attack was so brazenly the work of Israel so that they could incite enough international outrage as to have it attacked and destroyed, while forcing countries and people to take sides.
ISRA'EL (he that strives with god) + ROLE (part played by a person in life) + IN (being within) + HAMA (phonetic ham'-ah; at once).
Being implies partial within whole, hence each partial (life) striving within whole (inception towards death) at once (one time only aka now aka momentum of motion aka perceivable moment).
gaza
Aka Azzah (phonetic az-zaw; a philistine city) aka PHILISTINE (deficient in liberal culture) + CITY (center).
Liberal center implies ones free (Latin liber) will of choice at the center of balance, which others cultivate (domesticate) with suggested information. Those who resist following the suggested information by others represent "philistines", hence ones center of choice, not yet controlled by a chosen one.
That question is a conspiracy question.
People need to learn what conspiracy means
a) CON (together; with) SPIRARE (to breathe).
b) being implies one apart from one another...others suggest togetherness (collectivism) as the inversion thereof. Why? To distract one with others from self; which permits a suggesting few to collectivize a consenting many.
c) mind/memory is fueled by impressing force aka inspiration aka IN (being within) SPIRIT (to breathe; react to origin) ATION (action; enacted upon).
Being implies reaction (choice) within action (balance aka momentum of motion)...choosing to react to suggestions by others tempts one to ignore that, hence binding self aka adjure (to bind by oath) to another aka con-spire.
Stop noticing things!
Hey Rabbi! What are you doing with that gyrocopter?
So this is what happens when you watch another country's 9/11 or 7/7 or whichever date means they tricked their own people into a war.
I think it's worth considering that introducing Israeli animosity into the conversation would play into Albert Pike's description of WWIII and it's goals. Perhaps this is part of taking down the present nationalistic power structures.
In other words, implying that the Hamas FF attack was so brazenly the work of Israel so that they could incite enough international outrage as to have it attacked and destroyed, while forcing countries and people to take sides.
ISRA'EL (he that strives with god) + ROLE (part played by a person in life) + IN (being within) + HAMA (phonetic ham'-ah; at once).
Being implies partial within whole, hence each partial (life) striving within whole (inception towards death) at once (one time only aka now aka momentum of motion aka perceivable moment).
Aka Azzah (phonetic az-zaw; a philistine city) aka PHILISTINE (deficient in liberal culture) + CITY (center).
Liberal center implies ones free (Latin liber) will of choice at the center of balance, which others cultivate (domesticate) with suggested information. Those who resist following the suggested information by others represent "philistines", hence ones center of choice, not yet controlled by a chosen one.