Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

10
()
posted 2 years ago by clearsmoke 2 years ago by clearsmoke +10 / -0
31 comments share
31 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Ep0ch 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Curiously when did it get criminalised in America? I should look it up. A few decades in any majority? 2007 according to the Wiki. 15 years.

How many states is it criminalised? All? State Wide.

I am not going to justify the stance of this topic. It's grey. Do I agree with it. Debatable. Some dogs breeds haven't got any other purpose.

It isn't criminalised in much of South/Central America, has Mexico for example criminalised it? Cock/Bull/Scorpion and presumably dog isn't

  1. Give them an inch they take a mile. Until it's ban meat. Ban furs. Ban hunting. Censor free speech. Etc. Etc. Sick of it today. With animals is it cruelty? They'd fight to death in the wild. Should it be public. Not to the extents of a hound race, the same. No difference. One isn't a blood sport. Dog bred to run is the same nature as a dog bred to fight. So sick of that attitude of policing people to the extent their freedoms are curtailed. Did it harm anybody else. No, dangerous dogs that have no other function, sure some can be pets, until it bites another pet, didn't endanger the public, they fought. There was no harm except a hypocritical attitude. It simply wants to police your freedoms with its own toxicity, and its bullshit. It hasn't solved anything else.
permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Ep0ch 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Let me understand your oxymoron.

Our nature is the enslavement of something, potentially not me with mine, beating something over the head, forcing it to do what you want, according to your hypocritical notions of what you think it should do, to the point of unquestionable obedience? Welcome to dystopia.

How about feeding that pet kibble? It has killed it in about 15 years lower than its potential lifespan. Pet food is their main killer. Dogs the longest lived, 30-35, share one thing in common, they didn't eat kibble or any other pet food, except a natural diet, their owners prepared.

We have a responsibility to let nature be nature, preserve nature. Not cull something because wahaa it offends us.

Now you want to kill dogs because they're animals? Where does that stop? If cows cause climate change, surely the African Savannah has to go. But at the same time you want to ban hunting? Peak retard.

Look there's the moon, no animals, how about you go and colonise it. You will never stop our nature. It is conflict. Our season. Our wildlife. Our planet. Ourselves.

Deleting my former reply, I don't talk about me.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– Questionable 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

You post simply to be viewed by others, and delete those posts. None of which contains pertinent information that can be used to locate you. Nor are your statements truly relevant to this propaganda piece.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– no_ez 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Well, before bullets were cheap, most hunting was done by dogs, who deal the lethal blows to the prey.

Fox hunting is still like that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– no_ez 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I was just replying in context to the statement about “not training animals to kill each other” kinda thing. I think dogfighting is dumb, morally wrong— but sheepdogs kicking a coyote’s ass i have no problem with. Same for using them to hunt game, as long as you or your dog eats it or uses it constructively.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy