Shugar is an easiest and most effective fuel for your brain. If your body for some strange reason does not power your brain with shugar you consume, then it is not a shugar fault. It is your body fault, that for some reason assume your brain is not worth powering.
Try to use your brain more that usual if you have any problems with shugar. Your body should redirect energy flow to the brain instead of whatever body part it assume more important now.
All that insane anti-shugar hystery is a plain and direct attack on your thinking power. Don't buy it. Force your body account your brain more important than some belly fat and that's all. And eat as much shugar as you want without any side effects.
All those who talk about harms of shugar want you to think less and be dumber. That simple. If somebody try to convince you that shugar is bad for you, he is definitely deserve an immidiate and power punch in his lying face. May be multiple ones.
Shugar is a fuel for your brain. Those who want to deprieve you from the fuel for the brain are your worst enemies.
Yes, I know about all that ketone shit and other possible workarounds to fuel your brain without shugar. But it is like fueling your car with alcohol instead of gasoline it designed for. Yes, after some ugly sex with tuning and adjustments it will work somehow, but never wiill be able to give that seconds to 100mph and lifetime as on gasoline.
If your body use shugar for some weird things instead of fueling brain, then FIX YOUR FUCKING BODY, instead of rejecting brain from most efficient fuel - shugar. Use your brain much more, give your body a simple tip that brain is much more important than anything else. IDK, learn some foreign language, do some cool math, solve some complex problems, whatever. Think more. Make your brain work, and that's all.
They are not very different from regular shugar. They just have some fructose and glucose separately, not as sucrose.
Honey and plant syrups often have different vitamins and other useful things, so they are useful not just as a brain fuel, but for many other things too. Honey is the best, I think. Universal medicine and tasty sweet.
Brain need glucose. It easily obtained from sucrose by splitting it to fructose and glucose in your guts.
Most sweet natural products have same composition - fructose, glucose and sucrose.
But modern food producers like to make high fructose products and advertise them like "healthy" and all that stuff. But fructose does not fuel brain, It mostly processed into substances that intended to support body during hibernation at winter period. Rudimentary function, barely useful for humans.
So, food manufacturers make food that glucose deficient and with excess of fructose, so it is poor with brain fuel but reach with hibernation stuff. Guess why. :)
It's spelled with a single S, and I can tell you didn't watch it. Our brains worked fine, with even more calories to consume, centuries before cheap sugar. As well, the fuel for our brains from carbs can be made with many carbs, not just glucose-fructose.
My disagreement with video narrative does not mean that I didn't watch it. Could you believe that not every video will convince me in something. And if something told in video, that does not mean it is truth.
Our brains worked fine, with even more calories to consume, centuries before cheap sugar.
Sugar you buy in grocery is no different from sugar you have in plants or honey or whatever. It is the same disacharide C12H22O11, combination of glucose and fructose. If you change formula even a tiny bit, it just would not be sweet anymore and you will not be able to sell it as a sugar. So even synthetic sugar will still have to be same sugar.
In the distant past humans get necessary amount of glucose from berries, fruits, vegetables, honey, as pure glucose or as sucrose. You could be misled by fact that in the West sugar traditionaly made from sugar cane, that was not used in raw form as food, but in other parts of the world sugar made from other plants, f.e. in Russia all sugar made from beet, and beet is a regular vegetable in our dishes.
So, humans eat sugar from the very beginning in quantities, there is nothing wrong with eating sugar extracted from vegetables. If you are OK with eating berries, fruits, vegetables and honey, then you just can't be not OK with eating sugar. If you do - you have a problem with plain logic.
As well, the fuel for our brains from carbs can be made with many carbs, not just glucose-fructose.
First, fructose can't be used by brain as fuel. Only glucose could. Normal working human brain consume around 120 grams of glucose daily. Our body could extract glucose also from other substances, like starch, but it is much less effective than consumong sugar or glucose. Second - Ketones are emergency fallback for brain cells, for the situation when something is badly wrong with your body and it can't produce enough glucose and even liver is already out of glycogene reserves. It is like using starter to move a car when you out of gasoline or something broke in fuel system. You could do it, but for the short time for slow movement and with risk to fire starter motor and completely drain battery.
So, you need 120g of glucose daily to power your brain. You should eat a lot of starch/proteins/aminoacids/lactates to get that amount of glucose. Or you could eat less and compensate glucose deficit by eating sugar. Taking in account today's quality of food, eating a lot is a bad idea. With glucose and other useful stuff you inevitable will get a lot of unneeded chemistry. With sugar you will get only fructose as excess chemical, which will be normally processed by liver and will be eventually taken out if you are not going to hibernate.
Eating sugar instead of excess food, you replace all that modern food additives, conservants, antibiotics, antioxidants and so on in food with only more or less known to the body fructose. Choose by yourself - 10-20 teaspoons of sugar or additional 300-500 grams of food with who knows what chemicals in it per day.
Fructose rich diet is as unacceptable as ketone shit. It could be even worse, since body will eventually revolt against ketone torture and idiot practicising it will be forced to eat normally, but with fructose-rich diet body will began to prepare for hibernation. Yes, like a bear in fall. High fructose levels is like signal for winter hibernation. Of course, humans do not hibernate, but every mechanism is still in place - stockpile fat, switch all systems to low-power mode. Including brain. And high fructose level is a trigger. Human hardly will fall asleep for months, but will live vegetable life, like all that sheeple around - with low brain activity, lazy to move, accepting everything pushed on. Who knows, may be all that "healthy" high-fructose, sugar-free products propagandised also by such videos is what created sheeple from normal people.
Don't fall to all that anti-sugar bullshit. Eat sugar and use your brain fully - you will be perfectly fine.
Of course. but intelligence just can't exist without computational power.
You can see all the schlomo programmers running on sugars like crazy do nothing but ruin their bodies
That's because they are schlomo programmers, not real ones. Looks like they don't use brain at all, taking in account that modern software RAM and CPU consumption does not correlate at all with its usefulness and features. Schlomo programmers just mindlessly copypaste patterns, nothing more.
PS: Never met highly smart people who was obese or have diabetes or whatever diseases connected with shugar.
Tesla and Leonardo da Vinci, both low sugar diets, constant barrage of amazing contributions all their lives.
Name that amazing contributions. Ones that really useful and thoroughly developed. They mostly produced ideas, and overhelming majority of their ideas does not work.
You don't need much brain work to get an idea. In most cases they just appear in your mind without any effort when you are thinking nothing. Sounds weird and enigmatic, but that's a theme for another topic.
You need brain work to analyse, check and thoroughly develop idea to the level when it is easily reproduceable and working. Both Tesla and Leonardo was complete loosers in that part.
In Edison's case, he very much lived on milk, and he shunned many regular foods. No sugars. In later life was diabetic too. In general he a weird metanolism and I suspect had a few genetic differences in significant ways.
#2 they made sugar an essential ingredient in foods.
I'm not certain if he even knows what he means by that. In fact only 2 of these talking points are valid. 1&3. 5, is supposed to be about food policy, but he's discussing keto instead.
Oh, crap. This is just an add for a different add. If you've watched this video and believe it, then you are ready for the actual sales pitch.
And that next video? An add for you to watch his other 2500 videos.
Shugar is an easiest and most effective fuel for your brain. If your body for some strange reason does not power your brain with shugar you consume, then it is not a shugar fault. It is your body fault, that for some reason assume your brain is not worth powering.
Try to use your brain more that usual if you have any problems with shugar. Your body should redirect energy flow to the brain instead of whatever body part it assume more important now.
All that insane anti-shugar hystery is a plain and direct attack on your thinking power. Don't buy it. Force your body account your brain more important than some belly fat and that's all. And eat as much shugar as you want without any side effects.
All those who talk about harms of shugar want you to think less and be dumber. That simple. If somebody try to convince you that shugar is bad for you, he is definitely deserve an immidiate and power punch in his lying face. May be multiple ones.
Shugar is a fuel for your brain. Those who want to deprieve you from the fuel for the brain are your worst enemies.
Yes, I know about all that ketone shit and other possible workarounds to fuel your brain without shugar. But it is like fueling your car with alcohol instead of gasoline it designed for. Yes, after some ugly sex with tuning and adjustments it will work somehow, but never wiill be able to give that seconds to 100mph and lifetime as on gasoline.
If your body use shugar for some weird things instead of fueling brain, then FIX YOUR FUCKING BODY, instead of rejecting brain from most efficient fuel - shugar. Use your brain much more, give your body a simple tip that brain is much more important than anything else. IDK, learn some foreign language, do some cool math, solve some complex problems, whatever. Think more. Make your brain work, and that's all.
Mmm honey and maple syrup are my brains favorite sugars.
They are not very different from regular shugar. They just have some fructose and glucose separately, not as sucrose.
Honey and plant syrups often have different vitamins and other useful things, so they are useful not just as a brain fuel, but for many other things too. Honey is the best, I think. Universal medicine and tasty sweet.
Brain need glucose. It easily obtained from sucrose by splitting it to fructose and glucose in your guts.
Most sweet natural products have same composition - fructose, glucose and sucrose.
But modern food producers like to make high fructose products and advertise them like "healthy" and all that stuff. But fructose does not fuel brain, It mostly processed into substances that intended to support body during hibernation at winter period. Rudimentary function, barely useful for humans.
So, food manufacturers make food that glucose deficient and with excess of fructose, so it is poor with brain fuel but reach with hibernation stuff. Guess why. :)
Indeed. Make the masses sleepy and low functioning. Someday I'll have honey bees to make my own honey, really some of the best stuff on earth.
It's spelled with a single S, and I can tell you didn't watch it. Our brains worked fine, with even more calories to consume, centuries before cheap sugar. As well, the fuel for our brains from carbs can be made with many carbs, not just glucose-fructose.
My bad.
My disagreement with video narrative does not mean that I didn't watch it. Could you believe that not every video will convince me in something. And if something told in video, that does not mean it is truth.
Sugar you buy in grocery is no different from sugar you have in plants or honey or whatever. It is the same disacharide C12H22O11, combination of glucose and fructose. If you change formula even a tiny bit, it just would not be sweet anymore and you will not be able to sell it as a sugar. So even synthetic sugar will still have to be same sugar.
In the distant past humans get necessary amount of glucose from berries, fruits, vegetables, honey, as pure glucose or as sucrose. You could be misled by fact that in the West sugar traditionaly made from sugar cane, that was not used in raw form as food, but in other parts of the world sugar made from other plants, f.e. in Russia all sugar made from beet, and beet is a regular vegetable in our dishes.
So, humans eat sugar from the very beginning in quantities, there is nothing wrong with eating sugar extracted from vegetables. If you are OK with eating berries, fruits, vegetables and honey, then you just can't be not OK with eating sugar. If you do - you have a problem with plain logic.
First, fructose can't be used by brain as fuel. Only glucose could. Normal working human brain consume around 120 grams of glucose daily. Our body could extract glucose also from other substances, like starch, but it is much less effective than consumong sugar or glucose. Second - Ketones are emergency fallback for brain cells, for the situation when something is badly wrong with your body and it can't produce enough glucose and even liver is already out of glycogene reserves. It is like using starter to move a car when you out of gasoline or something broke in fuel system. You could do it, but for the short time for slow movement and with risk to fire starter motor and completely drain battery.
So, you need 120g of glucose daily to power your brain. You should eat a lot of starch/proteins/aminoacids/lactates to get that amount of glucose. Or you could eat less and compensate glucose deficit by eating sugar. Taking in account today's quality of food, eating a lot is a bad idea. With glucose and other useful stuff you inevitable will get a lot of unneeded chemistry. With sugar you will get only fructose as excess chemical, which will be normally processed by liver and will be eventually taken out if you are not going to hibernate.
Eating sugar instead of excess food, you replace all that modern food additives, conservants, antibiotics, antioxidants and so on in food with only more or less known to the body fructose. Choose by yourself - 10-20 teaspoons of sugar or additional 300-500 grams of food with who knows what chemicals in it per day.
Fructose rich diet is as unacceptable as ketone shit. It could be even worse, since body will eventually revolt against ketone torture and idiot practicising it will be forced to eat normally, but with fructose-rich diet body will began to prepare for hibernation. Yes, like a bear in fall. High fructose levels is like signal for winter hibernation. Of course, humans do not hibernate, but every mechanism is still in place - stockpile fat, switch all systems to low-power mode. Including brain. And high fructose level is a trigger. Human hardly will fall asleep for months, but will live vegetable life, like all that sheeple around - with low brain activity, lazy to move, accepting everything pushed on. Who knows, may be all that "healthy" high-fructose, sugar-free products propagandised also by such videos is what created sheeple from normal people.
Don't fall to all that anti-sugar bullshit. Eat sugar and use your brain fully - you will be perfectly fine.
Of course. but intelligence just can't exist without computational power.
That's because they are schlomo programmers, not real ones. Looks like they don't use brain at all, taking in account that modern software RAM and CPU consumption does not correlate at all with its usefulness and features. Schlomo programmers just mindlessly copypaste patterns, nothing more.
PS: Never met highly smart people who was obese or have diabetes or whatever diseases connected with shugar.
Define genius. Many known geniuses are relatively dumb in terms of using brain intensively. They just once got a good idea and that's all.
Name that amazing contributions. Ones that really useful and thoroughly developed. They mostly produced ideas, and overhelming majority of their ideas does not work.
You don't need much brain work to get an idea. In most cases they just appear in your mind without any effort when you are thinking nothing. Sounds weird and enigmatic, but that's a theme for another topic.
You need brain work to analyse, check and thoroughly develop idea to the level when it is easily reproduceable and working. Both Tesla and Leonardo was complete loosers in that part.
I was just reading a Thomas Edison biography. He ate little and it was low sugar except for some lactose.
In Edison's case, he very much lived on milk, and he shunned many regular foods. No sugars. In later life was diabetic too. In general he a weird metanolism and I suspect had a few genetic differences in significant ways.
I'm not certain if he even knows what he means by that. In fact only 2 of these talking points are valid. 1&3. 5, is supposed to be about food policy, but he's discussing keto instead.
Oh, crap. This is just an add for a different add. If you've watched this video and believe it, then you are ready for the actual sales pitch.
And that next video? An add for you to watch his other 2500 videos.
Well at least he's up front about that.