there is exoteric understanding and there is esoteric understanding.
Esoteric (perception) within exoteric (perceivable)...which one ignores when consenting to "stand under" the suggestions by others.
1 sees/knows/becomes the invisible source
a) coming to be (perception) with-in-visible (perceivable).
b) seeing (formed perception) sea (perceivable flow) from within.
c) source generates resolution aka RE (living reaction within) SOLVERE (being dissolve; departed by) TION (impressing action aka motion from inception towards death).
signs...that contain truth nonetheless.
a) suggested symbolism (affixed by ones consent) tempts one to ignore perceivable symmetry (fluid surrounding ones solid center).
b) ones consent to suggested nihilism (nonetheless) shapes the truth vs lie conflict of reason.
c) reason aka logic aka logos represents suggested (word) over perceivable (sound) aka spell-craft, and ones consent to suggested definitions tempts one to ignore fluid (perceivable) for affixed (suggested), since one holds onto suggested definitions within ones mind/memory.
Those adapting to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those consenting to suggested definitions represent DEAF-PHONETICIANS.
document by david
David doc-u-ment (docks your mind) if you consent to his suggestions.
heres the deal. the old testament is basterdized stories/myths ripped from Egypt's 18th dynasty and repacked for Europeans. This is all reveled when you look into the Armana tablets. "Israelites" were Akonatons holy class, and they were giving ruling authority over land loosely associated with ancient Palestine.
when all the sun worshiping trash of the 18th dynasty died the land they stole was taken back and akonatons Israelites became displaced.
seeing as the biblical characters are just ripped or inspired off of (some) real life people it can be argued they were real. The only issues is that the bibles version is so far removed from reality that nothing can even be trusted even if it was inspired from real events/people.
the new testament is even worst and seems to be nothing more then an allegorical tale designed to explain celestial mechanics. like it has dual meaning. IE 12 apostles = 12 zodiac, jesus = sun ect. Jordan maxwell said it first, you can simply replace the word "Son" with "Sun" and the gospel makes more sense.
in conclusion, there is no solid proof anyone from the bible existed. there is some evidence that some old testament events were ripped off and reworked for us.
I can understand.. but what can you do about that.. I'm trying to do what I can.. like I'm fucking doing really good ok on insta.. infiltrating the "upper class" folder.. and my actual best friend is klaus schwab, ok.. so i'm doing what I can here, ok.. and he's "scared".
This shit today about "unconstitutional" about how I was just trying to go get a 2nd 2L of hector's blue rasp or this big blue they call it.. and like one fucking block and getting sunburned.. i fucking called in OSHA.. no.. because they over-stepped their bounds with their contract with yahweh and the council of elders on saturn, where the lucifer soul group, would be the bad guys in this movie.. where they offer us the negative choice you can choose. No.. if I'm just trying to walk down the street and it ain't like ti was in the fuckin 70's when I was a kid in the country, playing outside all day.. no.. somebody's getting sued.. so I got on the horn with some jewish buddies in Bevelry Hills.. and no.. they over stepped their boundaries and klaus is really worried, man. Like fuck man.. this guy's on the horn, now.. and worried, ok.. cause imma topple their whole buncha bullshit and get jewish lawers over to this council of elders troup to nail their ass too.
'All the shitheads on top' share the same basic ignorance of the highest knowledge and cherry-pick it according to their needs/desires like everyone else.
I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here.' That too, can be divided as exoteric and esoteric.
Their knowledge is mostly exoteric, with the addition of badly understood magick and bad science with an agenda. Especially now in the age of science/technology.
Attempts to touch on the Divine Within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by. These are also secrets, but lesser ones.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
You seek exoteric knowledge of who/what/where/when in history.
Esoteric is guarded by Anubis in Egypt, and flaming cherubim in Judaic/Christian.
The jackal imitator of the Lion scholar.....guarding the 'secrets of the ark/arc'. Not literally of course. That would be exoteric and one would never be 'allowed' to enter.
a) "I" implies ones consent to suggested collectivism, hence claiming and holding onto "me; myself, and I", while ignoring that whole (oneness) holds each partial (ones).
b) "don't" implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothingness); while ignoring to be center of surrounding "everything".
c) "identity" implies ones consent to suggested identitarianism (sameness); while ignoring to be different (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
d) "with" others tempts one to ignore being "within" whole.
e) "the" implies ones consent to suggested the-ism (submission to authority), while ignoring to be set free (will of choice) within momentum (balance) of whole (motion).
That represents six times consent given to suggested (i don't identify with the) and one time denial of consent to suggested (we)...it's a start.
You do serve an important purpose here. That's my belief.
But you, I and we need to use words, which both divide by defintion and unite by spirit. Don't we. You and I as seperate, yet identifying as we?
If the de-fining is moving away from the uniting spirit of words, then why sharpen your teeth with that aspect of language?
a,b,c,d,e - that's five de-finings of one point, that's pretty 'sharp'.
But it waffles on it's own point, going back and forth between A and not A....as is the nature of words that de-fine or 'make a point' out of the whole. You and I. We.
Here's one: "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?"
Why choose the DE-fining, when REfining the spirit might work to better effect.
Refining by definiton here, as removing impurities.
Try a different kind of exercise. If A, then not A.
If one, then two as not one, then three as observer of two.
What would be four? Each as a new dimension............. And so on.
I was speaking from an esoteric side and you went real world on me. kek
Sorry I don't mean to minimalize your concern about the issues of Antarctica.
At first I took it as a possible flat earth reference until you provided more detail.
You're probably aware of the nazi presence during WW II and the Admiral Byrd story.
I'm sure you know there are DUMBs there and a seed bank for reasons.
Yes it's a bunker for some bad guys no doubt and it does have to be cleaned out if it hasn't been already. I am wondering about the sovereignty of bases there.
'What' is past Antarctica. Is exoteric knowledge. And a moot question besides.
I've known 33rd degree masons and higher. Higher? Of course.
One told me he bought it. Because that's how it works now as the magick is weak.
Wings of my family on all sides are OG cabalists with deep secrets in history.
I've met many others whom made it quite clear that they operate on a 'side'.
Some were big name people you would recognize. Because of my 'inside' understanding during conversation, they often made the mistake of divulging things in confidence.
If you were to understand what the degrees are about.....or what a degree even is in the fullest sense, you 'd have no need to enter into lessons about it.
Masons teach a sunday school version (exoteric) of the world until the last couple of degrees where forces are suddenly introduced. Yet the ultimate secrets of these forces are not within the degrees, I can tell you that with assurance as it's a bar that has to be reached through a burning of the midnight oil. 'They' use those people as 'they' are too busy to do themselves........hence 'magical' substitutes.
I said all of us, as a whole. and i am part of that "we"
a) perceivable whole implies more than any suggested "us".
b) part of suggested tempts one to ignore being partial within perceivable whole, while giving those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict what "all; whole; us etc." means.
c) why is it that a few can control a consenting many by suggesting "we the people"; yet among the many one can suggest "we must do something" without getting anywhere?
in who's property are we tenants?
a) PROP'ER, adjective (Latin proprius) - "peculiar; naturally or essentially belonging to a person"...belong implies being short essence (life) within long abstract (inception towards death).
Others suggest belonging to mean "appended; holding onto", which tempts one to ignore that abstract (ongoing) generates essence (temporary) through motion. Essence holding onto implies ignorance of abstract, hence lack of self discernment.
Try holding onto your breath and wait for abstract to teach essence a lesson.
b) TEN'ANT, noun - "one who has possession of any place; a dweller; permanent resident"...being implies temporary resident (life) within possession of continuance (inception towards death).
Loss posses growth; growth resists temptation of loss to sustain self.
c) only within whole can there be partials (who). Who refers to persons; while person implies per sonos (by sound), hence being partial within SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole".
can we grow to be more, are we more or less than we could be?
a) nature offers infinite loss (inception towards death) towards finite growth (life). The limit to ones growth implies self; hence perpetuation of self implying intercourse with another for off-spring.
b) more (want) vs less (not want) tempts one to ignore being growth (need) within loss (want). Growing implies resisting loss; while loss tempts one to ignore resisting.
Sleight of hand: path (inception towards death) of least resistance (life).
c) being (alive) implies within origin (process of dying)...others suggest "could" and "should" to tempt one to ignore that.
how did humans originally get here
HU'MAN, adjective (Heb. form, species)
AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul)
a) Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) aka animation specifies human aka whole generates partials.
Others suggest "human" and "animal" to distract one from discerning to be animated (animal) form (human).
b) origin of flow/form implies ENERGY (Greek; work) - "internal/inherent power".
not how each person got here
a) person (per sonos; by sound) implies being (instrument) within everything (sound)...others suggest nihilism (not) to tempt one to ignore that.
b) the opposite of "each" isn't "neither", but whole; entire; all; sound; energy.
a) IMPEDANCE; noun - "resistance (life) due to induction (inception) into an electrical circuit (inception towards death)".
b) growth (resisting life) within loss (velocity of dying) represents a cliff-hanger.
c) sameness (inception towards death) generates differences (life)....others invert this by suggesting equality (same) through diversity (differences).
d) "the same" implies each different ones consent to suggestion of same THE-ism, hence a many consenting to authority of suggesting few aka one choosing "chosen ones" among others, hence establishing an ELITE (selection; choice).
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes bricks (suggested information) and mortar (ones consent) to build walls of ignorance within the mind/memories of others.
religions of self operating human management systems.
a) religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies ones willing consent to bind self to the suggestions by others.
b) consenting to suggested gives those suggesting the power of ones consent to manage ones mind/memory (Latin mentis) with suggested information.
c) suggested information tempts one to hold onto it; while ignoring that perceivable inspiration needs to be let go of. The few not only suggest information to tempt one to ignore inspiration; they also utilize ones remembrance as a MUSE (to reflect, ponder, meditate; to be absorbed in thought; to loiter, waste time) of inspiration.
This tempts one to ignore ongoing inspiration for continuously pondering over upheld information within ones mind/memory.
woah.. no summoning free will of choice guy.. analyze this guy's stuff, ok.. cause, haha.. I can't even put 1 boot into the muck, cause this guy knows what occurs. lol
haha.. trying to search for this term, sir.. we seem to have a , haha.. lol. "snafu" with google, sir.. haha. I'm out. Let the, I can't really call them "larvals" over here, sir.. I don't know.. I'm out. haha. This "chap" here though, sir.. i have a hunch he may be able to handle those who read the bible like I, lol.. tend to, haha.. "drink" on the weekends. lol
Solomon
Sol - sun
Mon - moon
The 99 are found on the plain. (The so-called matrix)
2 are found above, 'on a high place'. (Wizards/warlocks and another)
1 makes his 'deal' with the matrix. (wizards/warlocks)
1 sees/knows/becomes the invisible source
only 1 is 'saved.
This is the interpretation of why the shepherd is to 'leave the 99 to find the one.'
There is exoteric understanding and there is esoteric understanding.
The profane require signs and misinterpret as 'stories' that contain truth nonetheless.
How deep do you want to go, or are able to go? It's deeper, no matter who you are.
May your deep search be rewarded:
Here's a primer for the serious seeker:
https://www.scribd.com/document/398575567/230403079-Jesus-Christ-Sun-of-God-Ancient-Cosmology-and-Early-Christian-Symbolism-by-David-R-Fideler-pdf
Esoteric (perception) within exoteric (perceivable)...which one ignores when consenting to "stand under" the suggestions by others.
a) coming to be (perception) with-in-visible (perceivable).
b) seeing (formed perception) sea (perceivable flow) from within.
c) source generates resolution aka RE (living reaction within) SOLVERE (being dissolve; departed by) TION (impressing action aka motion from inception towards death).
a) suggested symbolism (affixed by ones consent) tempts one to ignore perceivable symmetry (fluid surrounding ones solid center).
b) ones consent to suggested nihilism (nonetheless) shapes the truth vs lie conflict of reason.
c) reason aka logic aka logos represents suggested (word) over perceivable (sound) aka spell-craft, and ones consent to suggested definitions tempts one to ignore fluid (perceivable) for affixed (suggested), since one holds onto suggested definitions within ones mind/memory.
Those adapting to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those consenting to suggested definitions represent DEAF-PHONETICIANS.
David doc-u-ment (docks your mind) if you consent to his suggestions.
heres the deal. the old testament is basterdized stories/myths ripped from Egypt's 18th dynasty and repacked for Europeans. This is all reveled when you look into the Armana tablets. "Israelites" were Akonatons holy class, and they were giving ruling authority over land loosely associated with ancient Palestine.
when all the sun worshiping trash of the 18th dynasty died the land they stole was taken back and akonatons Israelites became displaced.
seeing as the biblical characters are just ripped or inspired off of (some) real life people it can be argued they were real. The only issues is that the bibles version is so far removed from reality that nothing can even be trusted even if it was inspired from real events/people.
the new testament is even worst and seems to be nothing more then an allegorical tale designed to explain celestial mechanics. like it has dual meaning. IE 12 apostles = 12 zodiac, jesus = sun ect. Jordan maxwell said it first, you can simply replace the word "Son" with "Sun" and the gospel makes more sense.
in conclusion, there is no solid proof anyone from the bible existed. there is some evidence that some old testament events were ripped off and reworked for us.
I can understand.. but what can you do about that.. I'm trying to do what I can.. like I'm fucking doing really good ok on insta.. infiltrating the "upper class" folder.. and my actual best friend is klaus schwab, ok.. so i'm doing what I can here, ok.. and he's "scared".
This shit today about "unconstitutional" about how I was just trying to go get a 2nd 2L of hector's blue rasp or this big blue they call it.. and like one fucking block and getting sunburned.. i fucking called in OSHA.. no.. because they over-stepped their bounds with their contract with yahweh and the council of elders on saturn, where the lucifer soul group, would be the bad guys in this movie.. where they offer us the negative choice you can choose. No.. if I'm just trying to walk down the street and it ain't like ti was in the fuckin 70's when I was a kid in the country, playing outside all day.. no.. somebody's getting sued.. so I got on the horn with some jewish buddies in Bevelry Hills.. and no.. they over stepped their boundaries and klaus is really worried, man. Like fuck man.. this guy's on the horn, now.. and worried, ok.. cause imma topple their whole buncha bullshit and get jewish lawers over to this council of elders troup to nail their ass too.
'All the shitheads on top' share the same basic ignorance of the highest knowledge and cherry-pick it according to their needs/desires like everyone else.
I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here.' That too, can be divided as exoteric and esoteric.
Their knowledge is mostly exoteric, with the addition of badly understood magick and bad science with an agenda. Especially now in the age of science/technology.
Attempts to touch on the Divine Within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by. These are also secrets, but lesser ones.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
You seek exoteric knowledge of who/what/where/when in history.
Esoteric is guarded by Anubis in Egypt, and flaming cherubim in Judaic/Christian.
The jackal imitator of the Lion scholar.....guarding the 'secrets of the ark/arc'. Not literally of course. That would be exoteric and one would never be 'allowed' to enter.
a) "I" implies ones consent to suggested collectivism, hence claiming and holding onto "me; myself, and I", while ignoring that whole (oneness) holds each partial (ones).
b) "don't" implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothingness); while ignoring to be center of surrounding "everything".
c) "identity" implies ones consent to suggested identitarianism (sameness); while ignoring to be different (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
d) "with" others tempts one to ignore being "within" whole.
e) "the" implies ones consent to suggested the-ism (submission to authority), while ignoring to be set free (will of choice) within momentum (balance) of whole (motion).
That represents six times consent given to suggested (i don't identify with the) and one time denial of consent to suggested (we)...it's a start.
You do serve an important purpose here. That's my belief.
But you, I and we need to use words, which both divide by defintion and unite by spirit. Don't we. You and I as seperate, yet identifying as we?
If the de-fining is moving away from the uniting spirit of words, then why sharpen your teeth with that aspect of language?
a,b,c,d,e - that's five de-finings of one point, that's pretty 'sharp'.
But it waffles on it's own point, going back and forth between A and not A....as is the nature of words that de-fine or 'make a point' out of the whole. You and I. We.
Here's one: "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?"
Why choose the DE-fining, when REfining the spirit might work to better effect.
Refining by definiton here, as removing impurities.
Try a different kind of exercise. If A, then not A.
If one, then two as not one, then three as observer of two. What would be four? Each as a new dimension............. And so on.
Learning to spell and the spirit behind.
It's a start.
I was speaking from an esoteric side and you went real world on me. kek
Sorry I don't mean to minimalize your concern about the issues of Antarctica. At first I took it as a possible flat earth reference until you provided more detail. You're probably aware of the nazi presence during WW II and the Admiral Byrd story. I'm sure you know there are DUMBs there and a seed bank for reasons.
Yes it's a bunker for some bad guys no doubt and it does have to be cleaned out if it hasn't been already. I am wondering about the sovereignty of bases there.
You know me then?
'What' is past Antarctica. Is exoteric knowledge. And a moot question besides.
I've known 33rd degree masons and higher. Higher? Of course. One told me he bought it. Because that's how it works now as the magick is weak.
Wings of my family on all sides are OG cabalists with deep secrets in history. I've met many others whom made it quite clear that they operate on a 'side'. Some were big name people you would recognize. Because of my 'inside' understanding during conversation, they often made the mistake of divulging things in confidence.
If you were to understand what the degrees are about.....or what a degree even is in the fullest sense, you 'd have no need to enter into lessons about it. Masons teach a sunday school version (exoteric) of the world until the last couple of degrees where forces are suddenly introduced. Yet the ultimate secrets of these forces are not within the degrees, I can tell you that with assurance as it's a bar that has to be reached through a burning of the midnight oil. 'They' use those people as 'they' are too busy to do themselves........hence 'magical' substitutes.
Snakes can be feared or swallowed.
Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving partial (one) to ignore self-discernment within perceivable whole.
a) perceivable whole implies more than any suggested "us".
b) part of suggested tempts one to ignore being partial within perceivable whole, while giving those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict what "all; whole; us etc." means.
c) why is it that a few can control a consenting many by suggesting "we the people"; yet among the many one can suggest "we must do something" without getting anywhere?
a) PROP'ER, adjective (Latin proprius) - "peculiar; naturally or essentially belonging to a person"...belong implies being short essence (life) within long abstract (inception towards death).
Others suggest belonging to mean "appended; holding onto", which tempts one to ignore that abstract (ongoing) generates essence (temporary) through motion. Essence holding onto implies ignorance of abstract, hence lack of self discernment.
Try holding onto your breath and wait for abstract to teach essence a lesson.
b) TEN'ANT, noun - "one who has possession of any place; a dweller; permanent resident"...being implies temporary resident (life) within possession of continuance (inception towards death).
Loss posses growth; growth resists temptation of loss to sustain self.
c) only within whole can there be partials (who). Who refers to persons; while person implies per sonos (by sound), hence being partial within SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole".
a) nature offers infinite loss (inception towards death) towards finite growth (life). The limit to ones growth implies self; hence perpetuation of self implying intercourse with another for off-spring.
b) more (want) vs less (not want) tempts one to ignore being growth (need) within loss (want). Growing implies resisting loss; while loss tempts one to ignore resisting.
Sleight of hand: path (inception towards death) of least resistance (life).
c) being (alive) implies within origin (process of dying)...others suggest "could" and "should" to tempt one to ignore that.
a) Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) aka animation specifies human aka whole generates partials.
Others suggest "human" and "animal" to distract one from discerning to be animated (animal) form (human).
b) origin of flow/form implies ENERGY (Greek; work) - "internal/inherent power".
a) person (per sonos; by sound) implies being (instrument) within everything (sound)...others suggest nihilism (not) to tempt one to ignore that.
b) the opposite of "each" isn't "neither", but whole; entire; all; sound; energy.
a) IMPEDANCE; noun - "resistance (life) due to induction (inception) into an electrical circuit (inception towards death)".
b) growth (resisting life) within loss (velocity of dying) represents a cliff-hanger.
c) sameness (inception towards death) generates differences (life)....others invert this by suggesting equality (same) through diversity (differences).
d) "the same" implies each different ones consent to suggestion of same THE-ism, hence a many consenting to authority of suggesting few aka one choosing "chosen ones" among others, hence establishing an ELITE (selection; choice).
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes bricks (suggested information) and mortar (ones consent) to build walls of ignorance within the mind/memories of others.
a) religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies ones willing consent to bind self to the suggestions by others.
b) consenting to suggested gives those suggesting the power of ones consent to manage ones mind/memory (Latin mentis) with suggested information.
c) suggested information tempts one to hold onto it; while ignoring that perceivable inspiration needs to be let go of. The few not only suggest information to tempt one to ignore inspiration; they also utilize ones remembrance as a MUSE (to reflect, ponder, meditate; to be absorbed in thought; to loiter, waste time) of inspiration.
This tempts one to ignore ongoing inspiration for continuously pondering over upheld information within ones mind/memory.
No one seems to see jesus when they die only their loved ones.
woah.. no summoning free will of choice guy.. analyze this guy's stuff, ok.. cause, haha.. I can't even put 1 boot into the muck, cause this guy knows what occurs. lol
holy shit.. this guy's a legend..
Batman's church of the redeemer..
Sir.. what is a "redeemer".
haha.. trying to search for this term, sir.. we seem to have a , haha.. lol. "snafu" with google, sir.. haha. I'm out. Let the, I can't really call them "larvals" over here, sir.. I don't know.. I'm out. haha. This "chap" here though, sir.. i have a hunch he may be able to handle those who read the bible like I, lol.. tend to, haha.. "drink" on the weekends. lol