I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here.' That too, can be divided as exoteric and esoteric.
Their knowledge is mostly exoteric, with the addition of badly understood magick and bad science with an agenda. Especially now in the age of science/technology.
Attempts to touch on the Divine Within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by. These are also secrets, but lesser ones.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
You seek exoteric knowledge of who/what/where/when in history.
Esoteric is guarded by Anubis in Egypt, and flaming cherubim in Judaic/Christian.
The jackal imitator of the Lion scholar.....guarding the 'secrets of the ark/arc'. Not literally of course. That would be exoteric and one would never be 'allowed' to enter.
a) "I" implies ones consent to suggested collectivism, hence claiming and holding onto "me; myself, and I", while ignoring that whole (oneness) holds each partial (ones).
b) "don't" implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothingness); while ignoring to be center of surrounding "everything".
c) "identity" implies ones consent to suggested identitarianism (sameness); while ignoring to be different (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
d) "with" others tempts one to ignore being "within" whole.
e) "the" implies ones consent to suggested the-ism (submission to authority), while ignoring to be set free (will of choice) within momentum (balance) of whole (motion).
That represents six times consent given to suggested (i don't identify with the) and one time denial of consent to suggested (we)...it's a start.
You do serve an important purpose here. That's my belief.
But you, I and we need to use words, which both divide by defintion and unite by spirit. Don't we. You and I as seperate, yet identifying as we?
If the de-fining is moving away from the uniting spirit of words, then why sharpen your teeth with that aspect of language?
a,b,c,d,e - that's five de-finings of one point, that's pretty 'sharp'.
But it waffles on it's own point, going back and forth between A and not A....as is the nature of words that de-fine or 'make a point' out of the whole. You and I. We.
Here's one: "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?"
Why choose the DE-fining, when REfining the spirit might work to better effect.
Refining by definiton here, as removing impurities.
Try a different kind of exercise. If A, then not A.
If one, then two as not one, then three as observer of two.
What would be four? Each as a new dimension............. And so on.
a) import implies from origin; purpose implies towards outcome. Being implies EX (expressing) PORT (to carry in form).
b) others suggest progressivism to tempt one towards outcome; while ones consent imports suggested into self (information), while ignoring perceivable (inspiration). Nature doesn't inspire one to reach outcome; but to adapt to origin.
c) SERVE (Latin servo; to keep), hence becoming a slave to others, when consenting to hold onto suggested. Meanwhile; inception towards death doesn't allow life to keep anything; "only" to utilize everything.
That's my belief
Belief tempts one to hold onto; "being life" needs to be let go of.
Others (Bon Jovi) suggest that "It's my life", while offering a sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."this ain't a song for the broken-hearted; No silent prayer for faith-departed". Being implies departed within whole; hence broken by division into units.
But you, I and we need to use words
a) no other life-form shapes words out of sound to communicate.
b) agreeing (want) vs disagreeing (not want) with a suggested word; tempts one to ignore adaptation (need) to perceivable sound, hence ones consent to words shaping the conflicts of reason.
c) definite (affixed) contradicts -tion (motion)...it's ones consent to hold onto definitions, which affixes them within ones mind/memory.
d) what is it that one needs to describe to others with labels? Will a penis not find its way into a vagina without exchanged words? Isn't getting hard, and getting wet inspiration enough for intercourse?
e) consider this...if others cannot take words from one; can oneself resist using words from others? That represents ones inner struggle with outside temptation.
both divide by definition and unite by spirit
a) divide implies whole (oneness) into partials (ones), and unite implies UNIT (Latin unus; one). Others suggest dualism (both) and collectivism (unite) to distract one from discerning and sustaining self.
b) SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiro) - "to breathe; air in motion; breath; animal excitement aka animation (motion) exciting mind/memory (momentum)" implies ones adaptation to that aka reaction (growth) adapting to action (loss).
Others suggest spiritualism (consisting of spirit); hence CONSIST (standing together; to be in a fixed or permanent state). That represents the inversion of spirit (adaptation to motion), and ones consent to the suggested -ism tempts one to hold onto; to affix it.
Don't we.
Aka suggested nihilism (doing nothing) and pluralism (we), tempting one (unit) to ignore being done by everything.
You and I as separate, yet identifying as we?
a) Identical (same) contradicts "you and I" (different). Ones consent to suggested identitarianism represents mass consensus, hence tempting each "different"one choosing "alike" to believe to be the "same".
b) Apartheid requires ones resistance; togetherness tempts one to submit to others; while ignoring to resist for sustenance of self.
c) Whole separates one (partial) from other ones (partials), which in return establishes each ones potential to grow self discernment or fall for the temptation of collectivism by hanging onto others.
d) ones claim over self (me; myself or I) shapes everyone else into a "you". Claiming self gives "yous" (jews) power of one. Why? Because each suggested CLAIM - "to call for; to ask or seek to obtain" is aimed at others, hence shaping other ones into "chosen ones".
If the de-fining is moving away from the uniting spirit of words, then why sharpen your teeth with that aspect of language?
a) suggested words (spell-craft) tempt one to consent to be spell-bound.
b) consenting to definitions (words) tempts one to ignore adapting (spirit) to motion (sound). Holding onto anything within a moving system tempts one to ignore being moved for that which one holds onto.
Notice how often people drowning ignore adapting to water by trying to hold onto anything floating. There's this vid of old white dude trying to save young black dude from drowning and the younger drowns both of them by holding onto.
c) as to why sharpening teeth with articulation of words (fiction)...because fiction (words) can only be shaped within reality (sound), and if one comprehends the difference; then it's just another unit of inspiration to draw from.
a,b,c,d,e - that's five de-finings of one point, that's pretty 'sharp'.
a) ABC (Latin abecedary) aka "abracadabra".
b) five of one represents one counting other ones as five, hence consenting to suggested collectivism. Each different symbol is shaped within the same symmetry (formed partials within flowing whole).
c) being choice within balance implies "on the razor's edge"...that's sharp.
going back and forth between A and not A
a) "between" implies self as life in-between inception towards death; while "not" implies one ignoring everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
A label (word) tricks one think it defines something; but underneath everything (sound) moves.
b) only while being (life) directed (inception towards death); can one freely (free will of choice) choose to wander (exchange; transform) around (up/down; left/right; back/forth).
the nature of words
The nature (perceivable) of words (suggested) implies ones ignorance of reality for fiction by consenting to suggested THE-ism (ones submission to authority of others).
Nature doesn't offer words; those within sound shape words to distract each other, which only works if ones consent to another ones offer, hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
'make a point' out of the whole
Whole introduces (inception) partial sentence (life) towards point (death)...others suggest one to "make a point" (end of sentence) as to distract from ones life sentence, hence tempting those within "out of". A suggested inversion.
Here's one: "How many..."
Each one.
why choose the DE-fining, when REfining
a) being implies finite (growth) within infinite (loss)...choosing others implies ignoring infinite for finite, hence the scarcity racket.
b) as for REFINE (depurate; free from impurities)...that implies being (free will of choice) within pure (balance). Ones choices of want over need soils self within pure, until natural order (inception towards death) cleans up chaos (life).
to better effect
Cause (inception towards death aka value) generates best effects (life aka evaluation). The more one evaluates cause; the better ones effects will be.
Others utilize effect (suggested) to distract from cause (perceivable), which affects one if consented to.
removing impurities
Being implies within (im) that which is free from mixture (pure), while responding (re) to being moved.
The suggested word "remove" implies change of place; while being "re-move" implies ones place (life) within change (inception towards death), hence reacting (re) to it changing (move).
Without self discernment (position within change) the suggested words of others change ones position.
If A, then not A.
a) implication (if/then) implies motion...if nothing (not); then no motion.
b) not implies conflict of reason (everything vs nothing). Others suggest reasoning over suggested (words) to distract from implication within perceivable (sound).
If sound; then words. If words; then agreeing vs disagreeing with definitions. It's oneself that corrupts implication with reason and others suggest words (logos) to tempt reason (logic).
Georgia Guidstones: "let these be guidestones to an age of reason".
Each as a new dimension
a) new, néwos, now...there's only now (perceivable moment-um within motion) for those within, hence nothing new under the SUN; SOL; SOUL; SOLE (one and only) aka "there can be only one" aka "one for all and all for one" aka "alone"...ALL(in)ONE.
b) dimension aka DIS (apart) METIRI (to measure) ION (action) aka partial reactions measuring each other within whole action. Oneself represents DI (partial) within MENT (mind/memory/momentum) of ION (whole/motion).
learning to spell
SPELL - "a charm consisting of some words of occult power" aka temptation to conceal perceivable (sound) with suggested (words) by consent.
I was speaking from an esoteric side and you went real world on me. kek
Sorry I don't mean to minimalize your concern about the issues of Antarctica.
At first I took it as a possible flat earth reference until you provided more detail.
You're probably aware of the nazi presence during WW II and the Admiral Byrd story.
I'm sure you know there are DUMBs there and a seed bank for reasons.
Yes it's a bunker for some bad guys no doubt and it does have to be cleaned out if it hasn't been already. I am wondering about the sovereignty of bases there.
The Trilateral Commission's charter involves the idea of a triumvirate of world powers.
You guess correctly with your concept. A little Epcot Center of seperated races for 'Globalism' singing the praises of unity while projecting an evironmental image that exists only as a facade as they sell overpriced trinkets to the onlookers.
Like the song, "It's a Small World Afterall"..........the reality is a nightmare that you can't get out of your head.
See Magnum Opus or The Great Work by Albert Pike for details.
'What' is past Antarctica. Is exoteric knowledge. And a moot question besides.
I've known 33rd degree masons and higher. Higher? Of course.
One told me he bought it. Because that's how it works now as the magick is weak.
Wings of my family on all sides are OG cabalists with deep secrets in history.
I've met many others whom made it quite clear that they operate on a 'side'.
Some were big name people you would recognize. Because of my 'inside' understanding during conversation, they often made the mistake of divulging things in confidence.
If you were to understand what the degrees are about.....or what a degree even is in the fullest sense, you 'd have no need to enter into lessons about it.
Masons teach a sunday school version (exoteric) of the world until the last couple of degrees where forces are suddenly introduced. Yet the ultimate secrets of these forces are not within the degrees, I can tell you that with assurance as it's a bar that has to be reached through a burning of the midnight oil. 'They' use those people as 'they' are too busy to do themselves........hence 'magical' substitutes.
You know masons. Or freemasons. Some might tell you some things. They won't be killed for it. Times have changed and what was 'dangerous' information has leaked out. The esoteric is taught as history lessons, and symbolic stories. Much like Sunday School.
There are truths. Some seem deeper and harder won than others.
Only Anubis/The Cherubim guard it.
Learn what that means and you find a key that opens the knowledge in all degrees. The whole Golden Circle and then some. The Mason squares the circle.
I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here.' That too, can be divided as exoteric and esoteric.
Their knowledge is mostly exoteric, with the addition of badly understood magick and bad science with an agenda. Especially now in the age of science/technology.
Attempts to touch on the Divine Within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by. These are also secrets, but lesser ones.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
You seek exoteric knowledge of who/what/where/when in history.
Esoteric is guarded by Anubis in Egypt, and flaming cherubim in Judaic/Christian.
The jackal imitator of the Lion scholar.....guarding the 'secrets of the ark/arc'. Not literally of course. That would be exoteric and one would never be 'allowed' to enter.
a) "I" implies ones consent to suggested collectivism, hence claiming and holding onto "me; myself, and I", while ignoring that whole (oneness) holds each partial (ones).
b) "don't" implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothingness); while ignoring to be center of surrounding "everything".
c) "identity" implies ones consent to suggested identitarianism (sameness); while ignoring to be different (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
d) "with" others tempts one to ignore being "within" whole.
e) "the" implies ones consent to suggested the-ism (submission to authority), while ignoring to be set free (will of choice) within momentum (balance) of whole (motion).
That represents six times consent given to suggested (i don't identify with the) and one time denial of consent to suggested (we)...it's a start.
You do serve an important purpose here. That's my belief.
But you, I and we need to use words, which both divide by defintion and unite by spirit. Don't we. You and I as seperate, yet identifying as we?
If the de-fining is moving away from the uniting spirit of words, then why sharpen your teeth with that aspect of language?
a,b,c,d,e - that's five de-finings of one point, that's pretty 'sharp'.
But it waffles on it's own point, going back and forth between A and not A....as is the nature of words that de-fine or 'make a point' out of the whole. You and I. We.
Here's one: "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?"
Why choose the DE-fining, when REfining the spirit might work to better effect.
Refining by definiton here, as removing impurities.
Try a different kind of exercise. If A, then not A.
If one, then two as not one, then three as observer of two. What would be four? Each as a new dimension............. And so on.
Learning to spell and the spirit behind.
It's a start.
a) import implies from origin; purpose implies towards outcome. Being implies EX (expressing) PORT (to carry in form).
b) others suggest progressivism to tempt one towards outcome; while ones consent imports suggested into self (information), while ignoring perceivable (inspiration). Nature doesn't inspire one to reach outcome; but to adapt to origin.
c) SERVE (Latin servo; to keep), hence becoming a slave to others, when consenting to hold onto suggested. Meanwhile; inception towards death doesn't allow life to keep anything; "only" to utilize everything.
Belief tempts one to hold onto; "being life" needs to be let go of.
Others (Bon Jovi) suggest that "It's my life", while offering a sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."this ain't a song for the broken-hearted; No silent prayer for faith-departed". Being implies departed within whole; hence broken by division into units.
a) no other life-form shapes words out of sound to communicate.
b) agreeing (want) vs disagreeing (not want) with a suggested word; tempts one to ignore adaptation (need) to perceivable sound, hence ones consent to words shaping the conflicts of reason.
c) definite (affixed) contradicts -tion (motion)...it's ones consent to hold onto definitions, which affixes them within ones mind/memory.
d) what is it that one needs to describe to others with labels? Will a penis not find its way into a vagina without exchanged words? Isn't getting hard, and getting wet inspiration enough for intercourse?
e) consider this...if others cannot take words from one; can oneself resist using words from others? That represents ones inner struggle with outside temptation.
a) divide implies whole (oneness) into partials (ones), and unite implies UNIT (Latin unus; one). Others suggest dualism (both) and collectivism (unite) to distract one from discerning and sustaining self.
b) SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiro) - "to breathe; air in motion; breath; animal excitement aka animation (motion) exciting mind/memory (momentum)" implies ones adaptation to that aka reaction (growth) adapting to action (loss).
Others suggest spiritualism (consisting of spirit); hence CONSIST (standing together; to be in a fixed or permanent state). That represents the inversion of spirit (adaptation to motion), and ones consent to the suggested -ism tempts one to hold onto; to affix it.
Aka suggested nihilism (doing nothing) and pluralism (we), tempting one (unit) to ignore being done by everything.
a) Identical (same) contradicts "you and I" (different). Ones consent to suggested identitarianism represents mass consensus, hence tempting each "different"one choosing "alike" to believe to be the "same".
b) Apartheid requires ones resistance; togetherness tempts one to submit to others; while ignoring to resist for sustenance of self.
c) Whole separates one (partial) from other ones (partials), which in return establishes each ones potential to grow self discernment or fall for the temptation of collectivism by hanging onto others.
d) ones claim over self (me; myself or I) shapes everyone else into a "you". Claiming self gives "yous" (jews) power of one. Why? Because each suggested CLAIM - "to call for; to ask or seek to obtain" is aimed at others, hence shaping other ones into "chosen ones".
a) suggested words (spell-craft) tempt one to consent to be spell-bound.
b) consenting to definitions (words) tempts one to ignore adapting (spirit) to motion (sound). Holding onto anything within a moving system tempts one to ignore being moved for that which one holds onto.
Notice how often people drowning ignore adapting to water by trying to hold onto anything floating. There's this vid of old white dude trying to save young black dude from drowning and the younger drowns both of them by holding onto.
c) as to why sharpening teeth with articulation of words (fiction)...because fiction (words) can only be shaped within reality (sound), and if one comprehends the difference; then it's just another unit of inspiration to draw from.
a) ABC (Latin abecedary) aka "abracadabra".
b) five of one represents one counting other ones as five, hence consenting to suggested collectivism. Each different symbol is shaped within the same symmetry (formed partials within flowing whole).
c) being choice within balance implies "on the razor's edge"...that's sharp.
a) "between" implies self as life in-between inception towards death; while "not" implies one ignoring everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
A label (word) tricks one think it defines something; but underneath everything (sound) moves.
b) only while being (life) directed (inception towards death); can one freely (free will of choice) choose to wander (exchange; transform) around (up/down; left/right; back/forth).
The nature (perceivable) of words (suggested) implies ones ignorance of reality for fiction by consenting to suggested THE-ism (ones submission to authority of others).
Nature doesn't offer words; those within sound shape words to distract each other, which only works if ones consent to another ones offer, hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
Whole introduces (inception) partial sentence (life) towards point (death)...others suggest one to "make a point" (end of sentence) as to distract from ones life sentence, hence tempting those within "out of". A suggested inversion.
Each one.
a) being implies finite (growth) within infinite (loss)...choosing others implies ignoring infinite for finite, hence the scarcity racket.
b) as for REFINE (depurate; free from impurities)...that implies being (free will of choice) within pure (balance). Ones choices of want over need soils self within pure, until natural order (inception towards death) cleans up chaos (life).
Cause (inception towards death aka value) generates best effects (life aka evaluation). The more one evaluates cause; the better ones effects will be.
Others utilize effect (suggested) to distract from cause (perceivable), which affects one if consented to.
Being implies within (im) that which is free from mixture (pure), while responding (re) to being moved.
The suggested word "remove" implies change of place; while being "re-move" implies ones place (life) within change (inception towards death), hence reacting (re) to it changing (move).
Without self discernment (position within change) the suggested words of others change ones position.
a) implication (if/then) implies motion...if nothing (not); then no motion.
b) not implies conflict of reason (everything vs nothing). Others suggest reasoning over suggested (words) to distract from implication within perceivable (sound).
If sound; then words. If words; then agreeing vs disagreeing with definitions. It's oneself that corrupts implication with reason and others suggest words (logos) to tempt reason (logic).
Georgia Guidstones: "let these be guidestones to an age of reason".
a) new, néwos, now...there's only now (perceivable moment-um within motion) for those within, hence nothing new under the SUN; SOL; SOUL; SOLE (one and only) aka "there can be only one" aka "one for all and all for one" aka "alone"...ALL(in)ONE.
b) dimension aka DIS (apart) METIRI (to measure) ION (action) aka partial reactions measuring each other within whole action. Oneself represents DI (partial) within MENT (mind/memory/momentum) of ION (whole/motion).
SPELL - "a charm consisting of some words of occult power" aka temptation to conceal perceivable (sound) with suggested (words) by consent.
Check out the lyrics of "I Put a Spell On You"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffB5ZwJ41AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMu0zGd2mXM
I was speaking from an esoteric side and you went real world on me. kek
Sorry I don't mean to minimalize your concern about the issues of Antarctica. At first I took it as a possible flat earth reference until you provided more detail. You're probably aware of the nazi presence during WW II and the Admiral Byrd story. I'm sure you know there are DUMBs there and a seed bank for reasons.
Yes it's a bunker for some bad guys no doubt and it does have to be cleaned out if it hasn't been already. I am wondering about the sovereignty of bases there.
The Trilateral Commission's charter involves the idea of a triumvirate of world powers.
You guess correctly with your concept. A little Epcot Center of seperated races for 'Globalism' singing the praises of unity while projecting an evironmental image that exists only as a facade as they sell overpriced trinkets to the onlookers. Like the song, "It's a Small World Afterall"..........the reality is a nightmare that you can't get out of your head.
See Magnum Opus or The Great Work by Albert Pike for details.
You know me then?
'What' is past Antarctica. Is exoteric knowledge. And a moot question besides.
I've known 33rd degree masons and higher. Higher? Of course. One told me he bought it. Because that's how it works now as the magick is weak.
Wings of my family on all sides are OG cabalists with deep secrets in history. I've met many others whom made it quite clear that they operate on a 'side'. Some were big name people you would recognize. Because of my 'inside' understanding during conversation, they often made the mistake of divulging things in confidence.
If you were to understand what the degrees are about.....or what a degree even is in the fullest sense, you 'd have no need to enter into lessons about it. Masons teach a sunday school version (exoteric) of the world until the last couple of degrees where forces are suddenly introduced. Yet the ultimate secrets of these forces are not within the degrees, I can tell you that with assurance as it's a bar that has to be reached through a burning of the midnight oil. 'They' use those people as 'they' are too busy to do themselves........hence 'magical' substitutes.
Snakes can be feared or swallowed.
You lay too much import on the 33rd degree. More than the Water Buffaloes do now apparently. (Freemasons).
Yes I have met some pretty powerful people.
The secrecy is more about being in a non-orthodox cabal.
My father joined and quit when he learned certain things.
I studied the materials both they and others provide. It's a guild controlling guilds.
Controlling Workers, and bosses, where real power lies.
Have you noticed the state of building construction these days?
Our floors need leveled.
You know masons. Or freemasons. Some might tell you some things. They won't be killed for it. Times have changed and what was 'dangerous' information has leaked out. The esoteric is taught as history lessons, and symbolic stories. Much like Sunday School.
There are truths. Some seem deeper and harder won than others.
Only Anubis/The Cherubim guard it.
Learn what that means and you find a key that opens the knowledge in all degrees. The whole Golden Circle and then some. The Mason squares the circle.
Next: What is a MAGA?