Did hear the buildings were being renovated months up to the attack. That one is true. Even when the buildings went down, parts of it were still shut off from the work.....
Just little coincidences you know?
Good luck finding proof of this, last time I looked it was pretty hard but it was on the wiki somewhere that it was having something renovated/updated. All I can find now is this blog.
Scott Forbes was employed by Fiduciary Trust Company International, located on the 97th floor of the South Tower at the WTC complex. He says there were some very strange events in the weeks leading up to the attacks, including; a complete power down of the building for over 36 hours, and mysterious ‘engineers’ doing work in the building using spools of wire just days before the 9/11 attacks.
Surprised thats still there. Sure its delisted though.
To boot, bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the complex on the Thursday, despite the fact that the complex had been on heightened alert for weeks prior to the attacks, under the orders of U.S. President George W. Bush’s younger brother Marvin Bush who headed up security operations for the WTC at the time.
Just the little coincidences that make you wonder, ya know? Forgot bushes brother was involved, I always think of that fuck up jeb.
One of the biggest smoking guns of 911? The airforce was chasing phantom planes that day, no way in hell that happened without high level interference.
Researchers of the "nuclear 911" event will also want to study the indispensable presentations of Dimitri Khalezov, which actually long predated Heinz Pommer's work. This should be enough to get people started:
In that article there's a short clip of his original 4-hour interview, which is worth digging up for anyone serious about the subject.
I can't resist linking another key article of his exposing in fine detail that Chernobyl was sabotage with small nuclear device, and no accident whatsoever:
I have followed the data about the explosions in the sub-basements that crumbled 30 ton steel doors as witnessed by tower employees. It's been pretty clear that specialized nukes were used at the bases in conjunction with nanothermite at higher levels. It is the combination of the methods that led to successful destruction, neither one alone would have been sufficient.
Also, many people are not aware that the buildings were connected underground by maintenance tunnels through which blast energy could be transmitted, thus damaging nearby buildings. I have never been clear whether Building 7 was part of that infrastructure but I suspect it was.
The use of the nukes is also verified by the burning of cars blocks away, where the paint on their metal burned (from the metal absorbing blast E/M energy that radiated between neighboring buildings) and rubber melted (from the metal heat) while nearby newspapers in the street - which are non-conducting hence do not absorb bomb E/M energy X-rays - did not burn. This was excellent proof of nukes. The thermal energy of the nukes was absorbed by the building, and by frames which because they were close to the bombs got redhot, while the X-ray energy left the buildings and affected nearby metal shell objects at a distance, i.e. cars which heated up upon absorbing the energy pulses. The steel frames of neighboring buildings absorbed energy too but were large enough masses not to heat up as much as the cars, and not as close to the bombs (energy available to be absorbed drops off as square of the distance hence close metal heats a lot, far metal heats less but thin metal will still heat enough to burn paint).
As a consultant I worked for a technology security company that worked with the New York Port Authority which regulated the towers, and the NYPA knew nukes had been used. After this, for the construction of the replacement towers, all truck entries under the building (there are loading docks underneath) were always scanned for radiation on entry by equipment the security company sells.
I don’t buy the nuke thing too much but they may have used some sort of top secret explosive technology we are not aware of. The basement bombing in 93 I think, was probably cover for prep work they did to get ready for the big show.
Never heard that one.
Did hear the buildings were being renovated months up to the attack. That one is true. Even when the buildings went down, parts of it were still shut off from the work.....
Just little coincidences you know?
Good luck finding proof of this, last time I looked it was pretty hard but it was on the wiki somewhere that it was having something renovated/updated. All I can find now is this blog.
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/911-tower-had-power-turned-off-for-36-hours-weekend-before-attack/
https://youtu.be/8edYhemleXc
Surprised thats still there. Sure its delisted though.
Just the little coincidences that make you wonder, ya know? Forgot bushes brother was involved, I always think of that fuck up jeb.
One of the biggest smoking guns of 911? The airforce was chasing phantom planes that day, no way in hell that happened without high level interference.
Researchers of the "nuclear 911" event will also want to study the indispensable presentations of Dimitri Khalezov, which actually long predated Heinz Pommer's work. This should be enough to get people started:
Blockbuster: Dmitri Khalezov with Vital New Information on 9/11 (videos unblocked) (Veterans Today 9/12/2021)
In that article there's a short clip of his original 4-hour interview, which is worth digging up for anyone serious about the subject.
I can't resist linking another key article of his exposing in fine detail that Chernobyl was sabotage with small nuclear device, and no accident whatsoever:
Khalezov: Chernobyl and Manhattan (Veterans Today 5/16/2021)
I have followed the data about the explosions in the sub-basements that crumbled 30 ton steel doors as witnessed by tower employees. It's been pretty clear that specialized nukes were used at the bases in conjunction with nanothermite at higher levels. It is the combination of the methods that led to successful destruction, neither one alone would have been sufficient.
Also, many people are not aware that the buildings were connected underground by maintenance tunnels through which blast energy could be transmitted, thus damaging nearby buildings. I have never been clear whether Building 7 was part of that infrastructure but I suspect it was.
The use of the nukes is also verified by the burning of cars blocks away, where the paint on their metal burned (from the metal absorbing blast E/M energy that radiated between neighboring buildings) and rubber melted (from the metal heat) while nearby newspapers in the street - which are non-conducting hence do not absorb bomb E/M energy X-rays - did not burn. This was excellent proof of nukes. The thermal energy of the nukes was absorbed by the building, and by frames which because they were close to the bombs got redhot, while the X-ray energy left the buildings and affected nearby metal shell objects at a distance, i.e. cars which heated up upon absorbing the energy pulses. The steel frames of neighboring buildings absorbed energy too but were large enough masses not to heat up as much as the cars, and not as close to the bombs (energy available to be absorbed drops off as square of the distance hence close metal heats a lot, far metal heats less but thin metal will still heat enough to burn paint).
As a consultant I worked for a technology security company that worked with the New York Port Authority which regulated the towers, and the NYPA knew nukes had been used. After this, for the construction of the replacement towers, all truck entries under the building (there are loading docks underneath) were always scanned for radiation on entry by equipment the security company sells.
TLDR summary: hell yes they used nukes.
I don’t buy the nuke thing too much but they may have used some sort of top secret explosive technology we are not aware of. The basement bombing in 93 I think, was probably cover for prep work they did to get ready for the big show.
Most 9/11 theories, this one included, are so stupid that it offends rationality.
That said, at least the people who spread them don't trust the government and have convinced a majority of the public that 9/11 was an inside job.
Carry on.