Dude, you have no idea how rights work. You're ass backwards. There is no ruling giving demon worshipers 1A rights, it doesn't exist, therefore their free exercise of religion rights for demon worshipers don't exist.
I've given you two sources, one by a noted expert, and you moved the goalposts to a SCOTUS ruling. Let me help you then, in the interest of Christian charity.
Here you go: Thomas v. Review Board (1981) Chief Justice Warren Burger stated, “[o]nly beliefs rooted in religion are given special protection to the exercise of religion.”
Since the Church of Satan worships demons, but says they don't worship and that they are only a secular philosophy, then 1A freedom of religion doesn't apply to them.
Since the Church of Satan worships demons, but says they don't worship and that they are only a secular philosophy, then 1A freedom of religion doesn't apply to them.
That's just your fucking opinion. Provide a quote from SCOTUS that mentions demons or admit that you are a liar.
Providea quote from the Satanic Temple that they worship demons or admit that you are a liar.
Can you read a dictionary? Read "worship" and then "church" and then the name "Church of Satan." There is even a Satanic Bible. They hold up Satan as a model figurehead. That's worship, mon ami.
You said, and I quote "source." One word. I gave you two sources, both of which were summaries of current case law. You later moved the goalposts asking for an actual decision. I gave you one.
Aaaaaaand you're moving the goalposts again, asking for a SCOTUS case involving demon worship specifically. I already told you, as did the first two sources, there isn't one, they don't take bullshit cases.
The Church of Satan is not a religion, as per the standards from Thomas v. Review Board. Therefore, they get no 1A protections as a religion.
Just take the L and move on. I might check this thread tomorrow.
There is even a Satanic Bible. They hold up Satan as a model figurehead.
Then it should be easy to provide some quotes.
Aaaaaaand you're moving the goalposts again, asking for a SCOTUS case involving demon worship specifically. I already told you, as did the first two sources, there isn't one, they don't take bullshit cases.
Then why did you claim that SCOTUS said that demon worhsip is not protected by the first amendment? You are the one who brought SCOTUS into the discussion, not me.
Look in the dictionary for the word "worship" and there you go. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worship
Dude, you have no idea how rights work. You're ass backwards. There is no ruling giving demon worshipers 1A rights, it doesn't exist, therefore their free exercise of religion rights for demon worshipers don't exist.
I've given you two sources, one by a noted expert, and you moved the goalposts to a SCOTUS ruling. Let me help you then, in the interest of Christian charity.
Here you go: Thomas v. Review Board (1981) Chief Justice Warren Burger stated, “[o]nly beliefs rooted in religion are given special protection to the exercise of religion.”
Since the Church of Satan worships demons, but says they don't worship and that they are only a secular philosophy, then 1A freedom of religion doesn't apply to them.
Just move on, really.
It was you, not me who invoked SCOTUS. Why do you lie?
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/irs-satanic-temple-church-tax-exempt-826931/
So how does that compute with your logic?
That's just your fucking opinion. Provide a quote from SCOTUS that mentions demons or admit that you are a liar.
Providea quote from the Satanic Temple that they worship demons or admit that you are a liar.
Can you read a dictionary? Read "worship" and then "church" and then the name "Church of Satan." There is even a Satanic Bible. They hold up Satan as a model figurehead. That's worship, mon ami.
You said, and I quote "source." One word. I gave you two sources, both of which were summaries of current case law. You later moved the goalposts asking for an actual decision. I gave you one.
Aaaaaaand you're moving the goalposts again, asking for a SCOTUS case involving demon worship specifically. I already told you, as did the first two sources, there isn't one, they don't take bullshit cases.
The Church of Satan is not a religion, as per the standards from Thomas v. Review Board. Therefore, they get no 1A protections as a religion.
Just take the L and move on. I might check this thread tomorrow.
Then it should be easy to provide some quotes.
Then why did you claim that SCOTUS said that demon worhsip is not protected by the first amendment? You are the one who brought SCOTUS into the discussion, not me.