Can you read a dictionary? Read "worship" and then "church" and then the name "Church of Satan." There is even a Satanic Bible. They hold up Satan as a model figurehead. That's worship, mon ami.
You said, and I quote "source." One word. I gave you two sources, both of which were summaries of current case law. You later moved the goalposts asking for an actual decision. I gave you one.
Aaaaaaand you're moving the goalposts again, asking for a SCOTUS case involving demon worship specifically. I already told you, as did the first two sources, there isn't one, they don't take bullshit cases.
The Church of Satan is not a religion, as per the standards from Thomas v. Review Board. Therefore, they get no 1A protections as a religion.
Just take the L and move on. I might check this thread tomorrow.
There is even a Satanic Bible. They hold up Satan as a model figurehead.
Then it should be easy to provide some quotes.
Aaaaaaand you're moving the goalposts again, asking for a SCOTUS case involving demon worship specifically. I already told you, as did the first two sources, there isn't one, they don't take bullshit cases.
Then why did you claim that SCOTUS said that demon worhsip is not protected by the first amendment? You are the one who brought SCOTUS into the discussion, not me.
Can you read a dictionary? Read "worship" and then "church" and then the name "Church of Satan." There is even a Satanic Bible. They hold up Satan as a model figurehead. That's worship, mon ami.
You said, and I quote "source." One word. I gave you two sources, both of which were summaries of current case law. You later moved the goalposts asking for an actual decision. I gave you one.
Aaaaaaand you're moving the goalposts again, asking for a SCOTUS case involving demon worship specifically. I already told you, as did the first two sources, there isn't one, they don't take bullshit cases.
The Church of Satan is not a religion, as per the standards from Thomas v. Review Board. Therefore, they get no 1A protections as a religion.
Just take the L and move on. I might check this thread tomorrow.
Then it should be easy to provide some quotes.
Then why did you claim that SCOTUS said that demon worhsip is not protected by the first amendment? You are the one who brought SCOTUS into the discussion, not me.