This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.
47 story WTC Building 7, with 25 central columns and 58 perimeter columns of structural steel, collapsed in 6.5 seconds because, because, gosh, hot debris from the twin towers flew over and pooped on the roof and gosh that melted the 25 columns and the 58 edge columns just like that!!!
-- Forrest Gump
It didnt collapse in 6.5 seconds though, it took around 7 hours for it to collapse.
report itself claims 5.9 seconds from the roof sagging to when it was done.
I bet your young enough to believe it was really a 757 that hit the pentagon, in a section that just happened to be empty due to remodeling. Im sure we will see those tapes anyyyyy day now. a 10 second clip missing frames is proably good enough for you though.
Also, care to explain why they were doing military scenarios that exact day for the exact thing? Talk about some luck on the terrorist's part.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2006/08/norad200608
All fake of course.
God was watching over someone that day.... wasnt the american people.
The report says repeatedly that it the building endured a fire throughout its interior for 7 hours before it collapsed. Saying it collapsed in 6 seconds gives out the impression that a structurally sound building collapsed out of nowhere for no reason.
The main point in all of this is that "truthers" tell half truths and full lies and it all hinges on them simply ignoring the structural damage the building endured from falling debris and the fires that raged for 7 hours. That kind of ruins the whole "it collapsed out of nowhere!" line you guys are selling.
Quality of spooks gone downhill. The B Team.
As in Gelatin.
I make this thread about once a month and you guys can only fall back on calling me names and deflecting since you have no actual argument. All your "truth fears no investigation" talk is bullshit since the moment you guys are confronted on this stuff, you immediately crumble.
Tower 7 had books in it. Ancient valuable books that are now missing. I can only find links about a gold heist, but researchers that were using those books bring it up once in a while.
Hell yeah now this is how you schizo post
Elaborate?
I can't always find the things I learn listening to podcasts, but usually sharing helps others pitch in.
Im saying that what you said is such an out of pocket claim that its something that a schizophrenic person would say. And just because a podcast says something doesnt make it true.
Then my comment isn't for you
He should have proally elaborated more, maybe linked some sources. Hes not wrong. I cant vouch for anything about ancient books.
But there was gold, and there were valuable books.
Its really strange, I could have swore back then that they claimed the gold vaporized, but according to newer articles, all of the gold was recovered. However the amounts keep changing. Was it 200, or was it 500 million.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-nov-01-mn-64176-story.html
https://www.wfmynews2.com/article/news/local/2-wants-to-know/there-was-500-million-worth-of-gold-silver-and-several-hundred-pounds-of-confiscated-drugs-in-the-rubble-of-the-wtc/83-beba24ef-cc41-4f74-91dc-4a1b0c3e6276
However, the gold wasnt under tower 7. What was in tower 7 was more important to the powers that be, than gold.
You can source the information yourself, looking for it brings me to a 100 pages about why tower 7 collapsed. But of course if I dont find it, you wont believe it right?
https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=130645&page=1
Convenient eh.
The mind loops you drones have to do to avoid the truth. As more and more time goes on, people are going to forget what happened that day. I never will. I watched the twin towers fall and the very first thought that ran through my head?
That looks like every controlled demolition I have ever seen.
https://www.nist.gov/pao/questions-and-answers-about-nist-wtc-7-investigation
Trust us guys, this one building burned differently because it was the only one we built differently.
It was actually 5.4 seconds guys, not 3.9. Totally fucking fake.
Do you hear yourself?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_czyNCNhDI&
This is just ridiculous that people look at this and think it fell because there were some fires on the lower floors, when all these buildings were designed for fires and even plane strikes. Oh wait, thats right this one was designed differently of course.
The fucking mental gymnastics, just trust your godamn gut and what your eyes tell you.
Even michalus's comments about ancient books may be onto something.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/05/from-iraq-and-back-via-911-and-harvard/
Just strange, not the only story about ancient artifacts either.
In any case result is the same. Only globalists, USA government and Israel got profit from that event.
Details are very important, when you don't know what is happening and who is behind that. Details could give you important hint.
But when you perfectly know final result and exact beneficiaries, details could have only historical value.
So does it really important, was there real planes or not, who exactly guide them into towers if they existed and how buildings was demolished, when you already know who did that and for what purpose?
If a malevolent neighbour will set your car on fire and then will began to push for passing prohibition of cars because of fire danger in your county as a law and finally succesfully reach his goal fearmongering your neighbours - will you really be interested did he used matches or a lighter to burn your car? Did he hired somebody to do that or did that himself?
Something tell me you will be much more concerned about repealing cars ban in your county, and making such cheating with your rights fundamentally impossible in future.
And those who benefited from that legislation, obviously will try push you to endlessly discuss an irrelevant and sensless question - what exactly did your neighbour use to set your car on fire, while citizens of county will still be deprived a right to have a car.
None of this babbling post even addresses the point. Muh tower 7 is such a hallow bullshit point for conspiracy theorist. I outright address it point by point and all I get is this vague nonsense.
Your fucking hilarious. Your third point doesnt even really make sense, when the report itself says the collapse took 5.9 seconds. Show me the structural collapse of any other tall building that happens that quick. Unless the entire thing disintegrates at one time, it doent.
And lmao you think we fear the truth? We are not congressman and billionaires with the ability to ship the wreckage to china within a week of the act.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2002-01-27-0201270268-story.html
Oh by the way, what happened to all those lovely people who helped get all that scrap cleaned up so quickly, for free I might add, without proper protection? Oh they got their reward all right.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/9-11-first-responders-still-fighting-health-benefits-21-years-later
Kinda reminds me how I was poisoned with refrigerant and WCB told me it was not possible so they didnt have to check air quality or do anything like, get me a doctor. In fact they took the same route you did, claiming things like.
"David said if he had got an apology, he wouldnt have been injured."
What I had really said was, I dont care about the money, just give me a apology and help and that would go along way.
"David thinks the government is out to get him."
What I really said was, I cant trust anyone who works for the government after what my caseworker for wcb did to me, not to mention I told them several times I am appalachian. I have a huge distrust for the government to begin with. All they did was solidify it.
Im so schizo hehe.
I have all the evidence I need for what happened to me, I just need to force A.R.C.A., that is the appliance recycling centers of america, the canada version to push for the lawsuit, or efficiency nova scotia. Since it was their contractor, my employer that poisoned me. Cock suckers.
"And lmao you think we fear the truth?"
Yes. A big point conspiracy theorist make is this line about truth not fearing investigation, but the moment someone sits down and debates these things with you, you guys immediately start with the name calling and shitposting. Or you just get so scatter brained you cant stay on topic and start going on rants about other conspiracies as well.
For those interested in the truth, take a look at szamboti's paper on a realistic collapse scenario refuting the le and bezant paper: https :// www (dot) metabunk (dot) org/attachments/discussion-of-le-and-bazant-2011-paper-rebuttal-to-reviewer-and-second-submission-pdf.4734/
He clearly shows they fudged their numbers to get it to fit the data (ie collapsing at 2/3 g). Guess what? The journal refused to publish his refutation because it was "out of scope". So not only is it clearly demonstrated that the towers could not have fallen at the speed they did without the structural steel being substantially compromised (ie demolished with explosives or some exotic means), but you have journals complicit with the US government in covering up this fact.
Video addressing and explaining some common "truther" claims https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9wpQ6b2Yw
Here is a video that explains the methodology NIST used in their report, it also addresses some other common "truther" points https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD24DDdiCXs
BBC knew all about it an hour before it happened.
No they didn’t, this is a lie.
Ive seen the video.
Now youre just a trolling derailing idiot motherfucker.
911 - Full video of BBC report on building 7 collpase before it ... BBC World News (September 11th, 2001 - 4:57 pm)BBC host Philip Hayton announces the collapse of WTC 7 more than 20 minutes before it fell, and then reporter ...
Retarded schitzo shit. The “truther” movement is such a joke.
https://fullfact.org/online/bbc-world-trade-center-7-september-11/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html
You're the joke. You have one single topic you discuss on here. Israel, Jews, 9/11 (Silverstein), and holocaust.
You don't even spread out. You literally are just pro-zog
No, it’s just that you are so obsessed with Jews that you have to make everything about them. 9/11 isn’t about them and you’re the one who brought up Jews, not me, and it’s because you have nothing to back up this stupid conspiracy theory with.