Tower 7 and how "truthers" are lying to you

posted 1 year ago by Cyber1776 1 year ago by Cyber1776 +4 / -6

This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w

The points brought up in the video are:

• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**

This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0

• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**

Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.

Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris

• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**

This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.

Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.

27 comments

27 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (27)

sorted by:

▲ -6 ▼

– Cyber1776 [S] -6 points 1 year ago +2 / -8

Hell yeah now this is how you schizo post

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– Michalusmichalus 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Elaborate?

I can't always find the things I learn listening to podcasts, but usually sharing helps others pitch in.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -4 ▼

– Cyber1776 [S] -4 points 1 year ago +1 / -5

Im saying that what you said is such an out of pocket claim that its something that a schizophrenic person would say. And just because a podcast says something doesnt make it true.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– Michalusmichalus 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Then my comment isn't for you

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– freedomlogic 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

He should have proally elaborated more, maybe linked some sources. Hes not wrong. I cant vouch for anything about ancient books.

But there was gold, and there were valuable books.

Its really strange, I could have swore back then that they claimed the gold vaporized, but according to newer articles, all of the gold was recovered. However the amounts keep changing. Was it 200, or was it 500 million.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-nov-01-mn-64176-story.html

https://www.wfmynews2.com/article/news/local/2-wants-to-know/there-was-500-million-worth-of-gold-silver-and-several-hundred-pounds-of-confiscated-drugs-in-the-rubble-of-the-wtc/83-beba24ef-cc41-4f74-91dc-4a1b0c3e6276

However, the gold wasnt under tower 7. What was in tower 7 was more important to the powers that be, than gold.

You can source the information yourself, looking for it brings me to a 100 pages about why tower 7 collapsed. But of course if I dont find it, you wont believe it right?

https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=130645&page=1

Seven World Trade Center was also the New York office of the Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA ordered the building surrounded by FBI agents shortly after it collapsed. Since then, they have been searching for computers and a safe filled with classified documents. Government agents watch the construction workers through binoculars as they search.

Convenient eh.

The mind loops you drones have to do to avoid the truth. As more and more time goes on, people are going to forget what happened that day. I never will. I watched the twin towers fall and the very first thought that ran through my head?

That looks like every controlled demolition I have ever seen.

https://www.nist.gov/pao/questions-and-answers-about-nist-wtc-7-investigation

Why did WTC 7 collapse, while no other known building in history has collapsed due to fires alone? The collapse of WTC 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires. The fires in WTC 7 were similar to those that have occurred in several tall buildings where the automatic sprinklers did not function or were not present. These other buildings, including Philadelphia's One Meridian Plaza, a 38-story skyscraper that burned for 18 hours in 1991, did not collapse due to differences in the design of the structural system.

Trust us guys, this one building burned differently because it was the only one we built differently.

In a video, it appears that WTC 7 is descending in free fall, something that would not occur in the structural collapse that you describe. How can you ignore basic laws of physics?

In the draft WTC 7 report (released Aug. 21, 2008; available at http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf), NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions. During the public comment period on the draft report, NIST was asked to confirm this time difference and define the reasons for it in greater detail.

To further clarify the descent of the north face, NIST recorded the downward displacement of a point near the center of the roofline from first movement until the north face was no longer visible in the video. Numerical analyses were conducted to calculate the velocity and acceleration of the roofline point from the time-dependent displacement data. The instant at which vertical motion of the roofline first occurred was determined by tracking the numerical value of the brightness of a pixel (a single element in the video image) at the roofline. This pixel became brighter as the roofline began to descend because the color of the pixel started to change from that of the building façade to the lighter color of the sky.

It was actually 5.4 seconds guys, not 3.9. Totally fucking fake.

Do you hear yourself?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_czyNCNhDI&

This is just ridiculous that people look at this and think it fell because there were some fires on the lower floors, when all these buildings were designed for fires and even plane strikes. Oh wait, thats right this one was designed differently of course.

The fucking mental gymnastics, just trust your godamn gut and what your eyes tell you.

Even michalus's comments about ancient books may be onto something.

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/05/from-iraq-and-back-via-911-and-harvard/

Officials know that much because the 145 Aradmu tablets were among a larger group of 302 tablets confiscated by U.S. customs when they were being smuggled into Newark, N.J. They were being stored in the basement of the Customs House at 6 World Trade Center when the building was destroyed in the attacks. Weeks later, the boxes of tablets were retrieved from the basement and stored elsewhere until 2004.

Just strange, not the only story about ancient artifacts either.

permalink parent save report block reply