the design was crap. even the diversity hire lead engineer said the design wasn't safe. ...and then got sued by the company for saying so.
the testing was crap. they did one test down to 3000 meters, never to 4000. the acrylic used for the portal was apparently rated for only 1300 meters.
the billionaire cut corners and used crap equipment. they apparently used one of the least reliable video game controllers to control the craft rather than any sort of hands-on, direct controls. they seem to have relied on texting with their support ship for geo-locating themselves. the /pol/ threads are 100% worth skimming.
you may be on to something--and what a symbolic place to do so, on the Titanic, which was the ultimate false flag op. It's hard to believe so many wealthy elites would go down in one spot---OH WAIT.
A bunch of idiots get titanic'ed while trying to see the titanic. Exactly who cares. It makes the news because it's ironic. "Idiots drown visiting the Titanic" it should be a sitcom. Of all the stupid things to do. Then you find out exactly how stupid it was. The funniest is they paid for it. Come see the Titanic in a, don't.
It makes you wonder, if there are people that silly. Or if it is just marketing?
So the owner/developer of this death trap, a 50ish old white male, didn't want to hire 50ish old white males.
Clearly people like this are suffering from some sort of mental disconnect with their outer appearance. What did he see in the mirror every morning?
I am guessing just as his asshole was imploding through his brain, his last thought was "I should have hired more 50 yr old white guys to make sure this thing was safer".
a) what can one hold in possession (tenure) while being (life) moved (inception towards death)?
b) what if life itself needs to be let go, while being tempted to want to hold onto?
c) how could one resist temptations when burdening self by holding onto? Does holding onto make resistance easier or harder? Notice that living implies getting older, hence requiring more resistance to sustain self...
the /pol/ threads on this are great.
the design was crap. even the diversity hire lead engineer said the design wasn't safe. ...and then got sued by the company for saying so.
the testing was crap. they did one test down to 3000 meters, never to 4000. the acrylic used for the portal was apparently rated for only 1300 meters.
the billionaire cut corners and used crap equipment. they apparently used one of the least reliable video game controllers to control the craft rather than any sort of hands-on, direct controls. they seem to have relied on texting with their support ship for geo-locating themselves. the /pol/ threads are 100% worth skimming.
fucking morons.
Sounds mostly like someone faking their death.
you may be on to something--and what a symbolic place to do so, on the Titanic, which was the ultimate false flag op. It's hard to believe so many wealthy elites would go down in one spot---OH WAIT.
Not only racist, but an ageist fuck too.
A bunch of idiots get titanic'ed while trying to see the titanic. Exactly who cares. It makes the news because it's ironic. "Idiots drown visiting the Titanic" it should be a sitcom. Of all the stupid things to do. Then you find out exactly how stupid it was. The funniest is they paid for it. Come see the Titanic in a, don't.
It makes you wonder, if there are people that silly. Or if it is just marketing?
So the owner/developer of this death trap, a 50ish old white male, didn't want to hire 50ish old white males.
Clearly people like this are suffering from some sort of mental disconnect with their outer appearance. What did he see in the mirror every morning?
I am guessing just as his asshole was imploding through his brain, his last thought was "I should have hired more 50 yr old white guys to make sure this thing was safer".
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hiring DEI sub engineers might not be a really great plan.
Was it a women piloting it ??? haha https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=prGbx38_GvE&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dtex%2Bavery%2Bcartoon%2Bwomen%2Bdrivers%26rlz%3D1C5CHFA_enUS919US919%26oq%3Dtex%2Bavery%2Bcartoon%2Bwomen%2Bdrivers%26aqs%3D&source_ve_path=MjM4NTE&feature=emb_title
a) who; what and why does the highest follow?
b) if lowest authorizes highest to lead; then why the executive (following) position?
CEO is just the bottom bitch, you know what I'm sayin'?
From "bottom bitch" to "top dog" with a suggested label (CEO)...that's how a few tempt many to ignore KNOWLEDGE (perception of that which exists).
CEOs get sacked all the time. They don't run the show.
a) what about the few who suggest labels such as "CEO" to the consenting many? Who could sack those?
b) look at this shit: https://img.gvid.tv/i/LTy2kL91.png Imagine the mental management required to handle all those abbreviations...
c) why is it called "alphabet agencies"? Alphabet aka ABC aka abecedary aka "ABraCaDabra"...spell-craft.
Those with "tenure".
a) what can one hold in possession (tenure) while being (life) moved (inception towards death)?
b) what if life itself needs to be let go, while being tempted to want to hold onto?
c) how could one resist temptations when burdening self by holding onto? Does holding onto make resistance easier or harder? Notice that living implies getting older, hence requiring more resistance to sustain self...
Holding things is part of the temptation itself. Does hoarding make life easier? Likely not, but most people do it to some degree.