I don’t know what’s in his heart but I’d be pretty confident he’s not worshiping the judges, so that wouldn’t be place gods before God to my understanding.
Images and trophies are not the same thing as graven images.
There’s particular instruction on images and what’s commanded and what’s forbidden.
Don’t fall into the word concept fallacy Mr. Dictionary
I don't know...but I'd be pretty confident he's not...
a) knowledge implies perceivable (everything); while don't and not represent suggested (nothing). Ignoring perceivable for suggested implies confinement...not confidence.
b) BUT (besides) contradicts CONFIDENT (full belief; fully assured)...if God represents whole; then each partial exits within...nothing can exist besides whole.
Consider if nothing represents partials choice to ignore perceivable whole for suggestions by other partials?
before God to my understanding
a) before implies forward (inception towards death) being (life).
b) understanding represents ones consent to "stand under" those who suggest "in the name of" (in nomine) God.
If God represents that which forwards being, then one represents resistance (life) at center of surrounding temptation (inception towards death)...standing under others tempts one to ignore that.
his heart...he's not
That represents one idolizing another. Notice that what I wrote describes behavior; not any ones being. Those falling for the temptation of idolatry ignore behavior (perceivable) for attached descriptions aka definitions brands; idols (suggested).
Images and trophies are not the same thing as graven images.
a) being able to discern in-between (images and trophies) implies differentiation. One cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences (partials) within same origin (whole). Discerning self as partial allows one to grow comprehension about whole...consenting to the suggestions of others tempts one to ignore "self" discernment.
b) IM'AGE, noun [Latin imago.] - "a representation".
Each one represents representation (perceiving partial) within presented (perceivable whole)...others tempt one to ignore this for representation (suggested information) within presented (perceivable inspiration).
Consider...imagination aka being IMAGE (represented reaction) within -ATION (presented action)?
There’s particular instruction
a) each one represents particular withIN STRUCTure of whole....suggested instructions by others tempts one to ignore discerning this for self.
b) whole demands adaptation from each partial within; adaptation implies expressing growth (life) within impressing loss (inception towards death)...others suggest one to follow instructions instead of resisting.
what’s commanded and what’s forbidden
COMMAND, verb - "to bid; to order; to direct; to charge"...natural order directs (inception towards death) charge (life); hence bidding "well fare" aka FOR (forwards) BID (utterance; driving of sounds) aka driving of PER (by) SONOS (sound).
Each "insane person" aka IN (within) SANUS (sound) + PER (by) SONOS (sound) represents the instrument (free will of choice) of resonance (need) or dissonance (want) within sound....others tempt choice to restrict self by consenting to suggested rules of behavior.
gods before God
a) suggested (words) placed by ones consent before perceivable (sound).
b) suggested pluralism (gods) placed before perceivable singularity (god)...now try to exchange gods with "we" and god with "one". The many are being tempted by the few to put others (we) before self (one)...that represents the foundation for "gods before god".
fallacy
Nature doesn't deceive; those within tempt each other to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested), which when consented to...deceives self through ignorance.
Being implies momentary occasion of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
b) nature doesn't dictate words; it represents ongoing solution of sound...I rip suggested words apart, while expressing comprehension about perceivable sound. I only utilize dictionaries to show revisionism done by the few to distract the many further and further away from source (sound).
Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound), while those consenting to suggested definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS (de-fi-ni-tions).
what's commanded...and particular instructions
Aka orders of mishnah and elucidations within gemara. Those who're reasoning about suggested are governed through TALMUD (instruction). Talmudic reasoning (deliberate contradictions suggested towards both sides within every conflict of reason) sustains division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents faith; reasoning against others over suggested represents versus.
Ignoring perceivable balance (need/want) for reasoning over suggested imbalance (want vs not want) happens within self before conflicts against others.
ten commandments...Novak Djokovic
a) aka your consent to suggested abrahamism and idolism. Nature neither suggests names nor does it count numbers...it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one) aka partials within whole.
b) perceivable commands perceiving ones ment (mind/memory) to adapt to input, wielding the free will of choice to adapt implies being able to tempt and be tempted by suggestions from one another.
orthodox
ORTHO (straight) DOXA (opinion)...only within straight (inception towards death) can one (life) shape deviating opinions.
Consenting to suggested orthodoxism tempts one to ignore that, hence affixing ones opinions by giving creed (faith aka consent) to creditors (those who suggest -isms).
practices
PRAC'TICE, noun [Greek; to act)...being implies reaction (perceiving) within enacting (perceivable); suggested practices tempt one to ignore that.
For example...suggested actors having directors implies reacting (life) to direction (inception towards death). The majority of mankind willingly ignores this contradiction.
interpretation
Suggested interpretation tempts one to "explain" to others; which tempts one to ignore being EX (expressed life) within PLAIN (impressing motion from inception towards death).
PRET (to traffic in; sell) tempts one to ignore being INTER (internal; in-between). Internal cannot sell external without ignoring ones position.
Suggestion cannot interpret perception...it distracts one from it.
your pharisaic
a) branding others as pharisees implies ones consent to suggested phariseeism. Furthermore...labeling others with brands implies ones consent to suggested idolism.
Orthodox: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"
Unorthodox: getting judged by others within (tennis) courts.
Orthodox: "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image"
Unorthodox: accepting Grand Slam trophies; wearing Lacoste and flashing Swiss-Watch sponsor around.
Lame
Gay.
one wonders why mods allow that particular bot
I don’t know what’s in his heart but I’d be pretty confident he’s not worshiping the judges, so that wouldn’t be place gods before God to my understanding.
Images and trophies are not the same thing as graven images.
There’s particular instruction on images and what’s commanded and what’s forbidden.
Don’t fall into the word concept fallacy Mr. Dictionary
a) knowledge implies perceivable (everything); while don't and not represent suggested (nothing). Ignoring perceivable for suggested implies confinement...not confidence.
b) BUT (besides) contradicts CONFIDENT (full belief; fully assured)...if God represents whole; then each partial exits within...nothing can exist besides whole.
Consider if nothing represents partials choice to ignore perceivable whole for suggestions by other partials?
a) before implies forward (inception towards death) being (life).
b) understanding represents ones consent to "stand under" those who suggest "in the name of" (in nomine) God.
If God represents that which forwards being, then one represents resistance (life) at center of surrounding temptation (inception towards death)...standing under others tempts one to ignore that.
That represents one idolizing another. Notice that what I wrote describes behavior; not any ones being. Those falling for the temptation of idolatry ignore behavior (perceivable) for attached descriptions aka definitions brands; idols (suggested).
a) being able to discern in-between (images and trophies) implies differentiation. One cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences (partials) within same origin (whole). Discerning self as partial allows one to grow comprehension about whole...consenting to the suggestions of others tempts one to ignore "self" discernment.
b) IM'AGE, noun [Latin imago.] - "a representation".
Each one represents representation (perceiving partial) within presented (perceivable whole)...others tempt one to ignore this for representation (suggested information) within presented (perceivable inspiration).
Consider...imagination aka being IMAGE (represented reaction) within -ATION (presented action)?
a) each one represents particular withIN STRUCTure of whole....suggested instructions by others tempts one to ignore discerning this for self.
b) whole demands adaptation from each partial within; adaptation implies expressing growth (life) within impressing loss (inception towards death)...others suggest one to follow instructions instead of resisting.
COMMAND, verb - "to bid; to order; to direct; to charge"...natural order directs (inception towards death) charge (life); hence bidding "well fare" aka FOR (forwards) BID (utterance; driving of sounds) aka driving of PER (by) SONOS (sound).
Each "insane person" aka IN (within) SANUS (sound) + PER (by) SONOS (sound) represents the instrument (free will of choice) of resonance (need) or dissonance (want) within sound....others tempt choice to restrict self by consenting to suggested rules of behavior.
a) suggested (words) placed by ones consent before perceivable (sound).
b) suggested pluralism (gods) placed before perceivable singularity (god)...now try to exchange gods with "we" and god with "one". The many are being tempted by the few to put others (we) before self (one)...that represents the foundation for "gods before god".
Nature doesn't deceive; those within tempt each other to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested), which when consented to...deceives self through ignorance.
a) MIS'TER, verb -"to occasion loss"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/mister
Being implies momentary occasion of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
b) nature doesn't dictate words; it represents ongoing solution of sound...I rip suggested words apart, while expressing comprehension about perceivable sound. I only utilize dictionaries to show revisionism done by the few to distract the many further and further away from source (sound).
Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound), while those consenting to suggested definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS (de-fi-ni-tions).
Aka orders of mishnah and elucidations within gemara. Those who're reasoning about suggested are governed through TALMUD (instruction). Talmudic reasoning (deliberate contradictions suggested towards both sides within every conflict of reason) sustains division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
What’s your pharisaic interpretation of the Ten Commandments versus the orthodox faith that Novak Djokovic practices?
Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents faith; reasoning against others over suggested represents versus.
Ignoring perceivable balance (need/want) for reasoning over suggested imbalance (want vs not want) happens within self before conflicts against others.
a) aka your consent to suggested abrahamism and idolism. Nature neither suggests names nor does it count numbers...it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one) aka partials within whole.
b) perceivable commands perceiving ones ment (mind/memory) to adapt to input, wielding the free will of choice to adapt implies being able to tempt and be tempted by suggestions from one another.
ORTHO (straight) DOXA (opinion)...only within straight (inception towards death) can one (life) shape deviating opinions.
Consenting to suggested orthodoxism tempts one to ignore that, hence affixing ones opinions by giving creed (faith aka consent) to creditors (those who suggest -isms).
PRAC'TICE, noun [Greek; to act)...being implies reaction (perceiving) within enacting (perceivable); suggested practices tempt one to ignore that.
For example...suggested actors having directors implies reacting (life) to direction (inception towards death). The majority of mankind willingly ignores this contradiction.
Suggested interpretation tempts one to "explain" to others; which tempts one to ignore being EX (expressed life) within PLAIN (impressing motion from inception towards death).
PRET (to traffic in; sell) tempts one to ignore being INTER (internal; in-between). Internal cannot sell external without ignoring ones position.
Suggestion cannot interpret perception...it distracts one from it.
a) branding others as pharisees implies ones consent to suggested phariseeism. Furthermore...labeling others with brands implies ones consent to suggested idolism.
b) PHARISEE (pharisaíos; seperate) + SADDUCEE (ṣāḏaq; just) + ESSENES (Essenoi; essence)
Aka being separate within just essence aka partial within whole.