Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents faith; reasoning against others over suggested represents versus.
Ignoring perceivable balance (need/want) for reasoning over suggested imbalance (want vs not want) happens within self before conflicts against others.
ten commandments...Novak Djokovic
a) aka your consent to suggested abrahamism and idolism. Nature neither suggests names nor does it count numbers...it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one) aka partials within whole.
b) perceivable commands perceiving ones ment (mind/memory) to adapt to input, wielding the free will of choice to adapt implies being able to tempt and be tempted by suggestions from one another.
orthodox
ORTHO (straight) DOXA (opinion)...only within straight (inception towards death) can one (life) shape deviating opinions.
Consenting to suggested orthodoxism tempts one to ignore that, hence affixing ones opinions by giving creed (faith aka consent) to creditors (those who suggest -isms).
practices
PRAC'TICE, noun [Greek; to act)...being implies reaction (perceiving) within enacting (perceivable); suggested practices tempt one to ignore that.
For example...suggested actors having directors implies reacting (life) to direction (inception towards death). The majority of mankind willingly ignores this contradiction.
interpretation
Suggested interpretation tempts one to "explain" to others; which tempts one to ignore being EX (expressed life) within PLAIN (impressing motion from inception towards death).
PRET (to traffic in; sell) tempts one to ignore being INTER (internal; in-between). Internal cannot sell external without ignoring ones position.
Suggestion cannot interpret perception...it distracts one from it.
your pharisaic
a) branding others as pharisees implies ones consent to suggested phariseeism. Furthermore...labeling others with brands implies ones consent to suggested idolism.
What’s your pharisaic interpretation of the Ten Commandments versus the orthodox faith that Novak Djokovic practices?
Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents faith; reasoning against others over suggested represents versus.
Ignoring perceivable balance (need/want) for reasoning over suggested imbalance (want vs not want) happens within self before conflicts against others.
a) aka your consent to suggested abrahamism and idolism. Nature neither suggests names nor does it count numbers...it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one) aka partials within whole.
b) perceivable commands perceiving ones ment (mind/memory) to adapt to input, wielding the free will of choice to adapt implies being able to tempt and be tempted by suggestions from one another.
ORTHO (straight) DOXA (opinion)...only within straight (inception towards death) can one (life) shape deviating opinions.
Consenting to suggested orthodoxism tempts one to ignore that, hence affixing ones opinions by giving creed (faith aka consent) to creditors (those who suggest -isms).
PRAC'TICE, noun [Greek; to act)...being implies reaction (perceiving) within enacting (perceivable); suggested practices tempt one to ignore that.
For example...suggested actors having directors implies reacting (life) to direction (inception towards death). The majority of mankind willingly ignores this contradiction.
Suggested interpretation tempts one to "explain" to others; which tempts one to ignore being EX (expressed life) within PLAIN (impressing motion from inception towards death).
PRET (to traffic in; sell) tempts one to ignore being INTER (internal; in-between). Internal cannot sell external without ignoring ones position.
Suggestion cannot interpret perception...it distracts one from it.
a) branding others as pharisees implies ones consent to suggested phariseeism. Furthermore...labeling others with brands implies ones consent to suggested idolism.
b) PHARISEE (pharisaíos; seperate) + SADDUCEE (ṣāḏaq; just) + ESSENES (Essenoi; essence)
Aka being separate within just essence aka partial within whole.