You don't have to. Once you're a "made person" in one network, you can network with others. That's how it's done. All the networks collaborate and operate on issues of mutual concern.
The mom's (Kate?) Dad seems to be an important lawyer. Got her away from Tom and Scientology asap. Maybe the freemasonry was from that side.
Also, Tom Cruise has been non- contact since they are.... suspect persons? Something like that. Nonbelievers who might corrupt people away from Scientology.
a) consenting to suggested -IST tempts one to ignore doing it by FREE will of choice.
b) wielding free will of choice implies being able to suggest labels for self to others; who uphold those labels by consenting to them.
c) tempting others to consent to uphold suggested aka to affix within ones mind/memory...that represents free (will of choice) masonry.
d) one can be whatever one expresses to be and whatever others believe or disbelief one to be. The former can only be shaped within perceivable; while the latter can be shaped with suggestions.
One can only be a Freemason or Scientologist if others consent to suggested Freemasonry or Scientology...if others consent to both; then one can be both within their minds.
More than likely since higher forms of freemason tell you throw away your god and worship satan.
lord Xeno hype
I'm not big into Warhammer, what do you mean?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu
Well, I was way off.
You don't have to. Once you're a "made person" in one network, you can network with others. That's how it's done. All the networks collaborate and operate on issues of mutual concern.
Makes sense
Freemason here. No.
Thank you for your answer, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Nah its more like an alternate allegorical version of the Christian creation story. Honestly you can find most of it on YouTube.
The mom's (Kate?) Dad seems to be an important lawyer. Got her away from Tom and Scientology asap. Maybe the freemasonry was from that side.
Also, Tom Cruise has been non- contact since they are.... suspect persons? Something like that. Nonbelievers who might corrupt people away from Scientology.
Thanks, that makes tons of sense.
a) consenting to suggested -IST tempts one to ignore doing it by FREE will of choice.
b) wielding free will of choice implies being able to suggest labels for self to others; who uphold those labels by consenting to them.
c) tempting others to consent to uphold suggested aka to affix within ones mind/memory...that represents free (will of choice) masonry.
d) one can be whatever one expresses to be and whatever others believe or disbelief one to be. The former can only be shaped within perceivable; while the latter can be shaped with suggestions.
One can only be a Freemason or Scientologist if others consent to suggested Freemasonry or Scientology...if others consent to both; then one can be both within their minds.