Chinese scientists war-game hypersonic strike on US carrier group...
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
The Chinese have built a mound of skulls. The Chinese are doing the same things as the Aztecs to Tibet and the Uyghurs, who are arguably white. So as a white man, I have a problem with the yellow man genociding white men.
As for the Jews, I would say "why not both".
Who don't? Remember that weird Paris catacombs with walls made from skulls?
The question only about exporting that shit.
Civilization that practicise something like that either extinct, either drop such tradition at some moment of time.
As for white man, I think niggers in USA for the last 60 years killed much more white men than Chineese for millenia of existense.
Tibetians are pure asians, Uighurs are half-bred asians with indo-europeans.
Something tell me that you will not accept f.e. mulatto as a white person. :)
Why you didn't even bother to check things out?
You don't have to like somebody to study him.
The bodies in the Paris catacombs are from normal burials, moved after the cemeteries were full, not the remains of human sacrifices to a demon in order to scare their enemies, like with the Aztecs.
I stopped only skimmed what you wrote after that enormous error of fact, and no, I'm not going to get into a "what is white" purity spiral.
I'm being respectful, I hope you see that, but I think we're done for this thread. I'll read your reply. Thanks.
And you know it from what sources? How do we know that skulls from Paris catacombs are not result of Revolution or whatever massacre or who Aztecs really sacrificed? All we have is just human skulls. Unfortunately, they can't be asked.
I'm not trying to force you to. Really there exist a simple and definitive answer to that question - "whites are people who accounted as whites by all other whites". As simple as that. Same thing is true for any other race or etnicity. Yes, it is recursive, but who told you that recursive definition can't be perfectly valid?
What I'm trying to force you is to take a look from above of any possible bias.
F.e. Uighurs live in Kazakhstan too, and AFAIK they are not people anybody will want to have relations with. Ethnic conflicts between Kazakhs and Uigurs in Kazakhstan are not rare thing, and usually Uighurs are those who start or provoke them. Uighurs also somehow manage to start conflicts with Kirgyz in Kirgyzstan too. And nobody put them in camps nor in Kazakhstan, nor in Kirgyzstan, because "tolerance" and "diversity". What if Chineese have another tradition to manage some annoying tribes? Why do you think Chineese have to obey that Western "tolerance" rules?