The bodies in the Paris catacombs are from normal burials, moved after the cemeteries were full, not the remains of human sacrifices to a demon in order to scare their enemies, like with the Aztecs.

And you know it from what sources? How do we know that skulls from Paris catacombs are not result of Revolution or whatever massacre or who Aztecs really sacrificed? All we have is just human skulls. Unfortunately, they can't be asked.

'm not going to get into a "what is white" purity spiral.

I'm not trying to force you to. Really there exist a simple and definitive answer to that question - "whites are people who accounted as whites by all other whites". As simple as that. Same thing is true for any other race or etnicity. Yes, it is recursive, but who told you that recursive definition can't be perfectly valid?

What I'm trying to force you is to take a look from above of any possible bias.

F.e. Uighurs live in Kazakhstan too, and AFAIK they are not people anybody will want to have relations with. Ethnic conflicts between Kazakhs and Uigurs in Kazakhstan are not rare thing, and usually Uighurs are those who start or provoke them. Uighurs also somehow manage to start conflicts with Kirgyz in Kirgyzstan too. And nobody put them in camps nor in Kazakhstan, nor in Kirgyzstan, because "tolerance" and "diversity". What if Chineese have another tradition to manage some annoying tribes? Why do you think Chineese have to obey that Western "tolerance" rules?