Each ones "point" of view exits within everything perceivable...consenting to others pointing out suggested tempts one to ignore that.
a good code
One-self implies partial within...a suggested CODE (a collection of aka suggested collectivism) tempts one to ignore self, while giving others consent to collect, to amass; to gain control over partials.
Ignore them
Suggested "them" (a collective) tempts perceiving "one" (a partial) to ignore self.
Everything perceivable is open to be seen (evident) by each perceiving one within...unless ignored for wanting to seek (quero) suggested.
album covers
AL'BUM, noun [Latin albus, white.]...why cover "white" underneath a different definition? Why would tavistock label their Beatles propaganda as the "white album" aka the "white white"...which also represents the only "double" album released?
Ignore them. It's a good code. I never noticed until it was pointed out.
Each ones "point" of view exits within everything perceivable...consenting to others pointing out suggested tempts one to ignore that.
One-self implies partial within...a suggested CODE (a collection of aka suggested collectivism) tempts one to ignore self, while giving others consent to collect, to amass; to gain control over partials.
Suggested "them" (a collective) tempts perceiving "one" (a partial) to ignore self.
Evidence is what I require.
Not album covers.
Everything perceivable is open to be seen (evident) by each perceiving one within...unless ignored for wanting to seek (quero) suggested.
AL'BUM, noun [Latin albus, white.]...why cover "white" underneath a different definition? Why would tavistock label their Beatles propaganda as the "white album" aka the "white white"...which also represents the only "double" album released?
Good catch.