Botsplaining. A bunch of dumbasses. I hate stupid autistic trends. They're often generated by idiots influencing the gullible. Another word created by the illiterate.
Explaining something was already subjective, if it indeed explained something factual. Instead of another useless opinion granting nothing else.
Yea it's a bot. The others are also probably bots.
The point is to parody terms like 'mansplaining' because they're stupid. People are having fun and you're complaining. What are you, some kind of hedophobe?
Meh. It was a joke but it failed since I have to point it out. This is how I was picturing Ep0ch. Is he even human by the way or just a negativity bot?
Edit: its paragraphing and tone are consistent, I can tell it's a bot just from looking at his comments ITT.
Fun butchering a language, turning it into bullshit. All because you're not creative enough, and suffer from the autism. You proceed to make up bullshit and call it words, because you didn't know what the word explaining meant. It needed to be called something else you could associate with, like an autistic retard because you're a little nigger delinquent. So fun. Real fun right. Mouths in the gibberish, onking. Your word became a stupid trend. Instead of being ignored retards turned into, look at that Bob, it has been programmed into bots. All because the word explaining isn't subjective? It needed today's piss and shit poured all over it.
It isn't a topic. It's a language niggers use. Look at those bots.
It was created by who and why. Tell me this. It was created by prejudice. A prejudice to being taught or having something explained. Instead it sought to shit on it and in hate. It knew best. It didn't respect. It had a chip on its shoulder.
TREND, verb - "to have a particular direction"...ones choice to love or hate the suggestions (bots) by others shapes the particular direction of the suggested.
Trends feed off consent...
They're often generated by idiots influencing
The reactions of those who "love" suggested are influenced by those who "hate" suggested...others generate suggestions to shape reactors and influencers.
Recent example...jewtube influencers and their reacting audiences.
Another word created
Shaping a suggestible word out of perceivable sound...does that represent creation (out of nothing) or transmutation (out of everything)?
Explaining something was already subjective
Notice that explaining to one another by suggestion implies...subjective to subjective, while ignoring objective (perceivable).
What if nature impresses (loss) so that those within nature can express (growth) or choose to ignore that by subjecting themselves to one another?
explained something factual
FACT, noun [Latin factum, facio] - "any thing done, or that comes to pass; an act; a deed; an effect produced"...
a) how can a subjective reaction produce a factual action?
b) what about...action (inception towards death) producing reaction (life), hence being subject (living) within object (process of dying)?
c) why are the few suggesting the consenting many rhetoric like "just do it" or "facism" or "factories" or "fact-check" etc.?
Why was this a topic?
TOP'IC, noun (Latin topicus, topica) - "any subject of discourse or argument"; because if everyone represents a subject; then everything suggested to one another represents a topic within an argument (conflict of reason).
Anyone who still uses twitter or reddit BEHAVES like a robot whether they are one or not.
Most people are just robots. They put a mask on because they were programmed to do it. They let lying jews inoculate them because they were programmed to do it.
The automated is a bot. The person above and replied too is on larger probability a bot, linking @bobsplaining. The person above might be genuine and shadowed by bots.. Are they that stupid. They open their mouth and it's blimey. It added necessary volume. What was the conversation in reply and regards towards. But their generic commenting is causing what? Support providing the advertising volume. In case the topic needed the numbers and likes.
Explain the anomaly. They've added exactly what into the topic. Nothing, instead they literally propagate support, and the advertising volume with generic replies further marking the pages with nonsense. Why?
Humans don't, it's ignorance, there are plenty of these, but why bother commenting unless you have shit to say about it? Pro or against. Seriously. Although there are paid commentators. But if you're paid to comment, won't you attack it, or support it. Instead of, tell me this.
The immediate bottom two are bots. The first one could be but is shadowed by bots. The first could be another bot all they said was shit. Who tweets feining ignorance? Why? Support for advertising volume. Artifical likes. It needs to have the supposed numbers, showing activity.
Humans just get dumber.
No I am not guessing. Like the topic poster, I am gauging the probability. We know twitter is overrun by bots. Like the rest of social media. What are they supporting, adding the numbers and volume in? It needed to show activity. It inserts bots. They mouth breathe bullshit. Next we have John Doe being explained.
Ughh i hated Marketing in college. One of my least favorite subjects.
I am not disputing with you which twitter reply is automated bot, paid shill, or otherwise.
It's hard to tell a real person online from a bot. Do you think that is moreso because people's behavior has been engineered to be robotic? Or because bots became so much smarter thanks to the speed of computer processors, data retention and refined programming? A combination of both I reckon. I think I was merely mocking the idea that people behave so robotically these days that it's become so difficult to differentiate a dumb fucking algorithm versus a dumb fucking person with a mask on typing a tweet.
Look at these dumb humans. What opinion did they have. Nothing but advertising numbers providing a common poll, often of likes, showing activity. Although any data collection behind genuine posts, is doing far more. It spins it. Until everything sooner becomes an agenda driven, driving the advertising where it needs the numbers and the volume spinning it for its topics and persona's.
But yea it has become the dumbing down of civilization as it bombards advertising and narratives.
I question the humanity. Who does that, look at us in every topic. We even fight about it. We as humans have an opinion. We defend them.
We don't offer nothing.
Apart from that idiot below turning the topic into nonsense.
They are categorically bots. Or their brains were fried by them.
Botsplaining. A bunch of dumbasses. I hate stupid autistic trends. They're often generated by idiots influencing the gullible. Another word created by the illiterate.
Explaining something was already subjective, if it indeed explained something factual. Instead of another useless opinion granting nothing else.
Yea it's a bot. The others are also probably bots.
Why was this a topic?
The point is to parody terms like 'mansplaining' because they're stupid. People are having fun and you're complaining. What are you, some kind of hedophobe?
Most people here are just pessimistic people with short patience. Myself included.
Is a hedophobe someone who objects to hedonism?
Meh. It was a joke but it failed since I have to point it out. This is how I was picturing Ep0ch. Is he even human by the way or just a negativity bot?
Edit: its paragraphing and tone are consistent, I can tell it's a bot just from looking at his comments ITT.
a) what if a boundary can only exist within motion? How could those within motion (life being moved from inception towards death) stop it?
b) notice that "terminology" used for expression represents repression (boundary) if one consents to use it...
Fun butchering a language, turning it into bullshit. All because you're not creative enough, and suffer from the autism. You proceed to make up bullshit and call it words, because you didn't know what the word explaining meant. It needed to be called something else you could associate with, like an autistic retard because you're a little nigger delinquent. So fun. Real fun right. Mouths in the gibberish, onking. Your word became a stupid trend. Instead of being ignored retards turned into, look at that Bob, it has been programmed into bots. All because the word explaining isn't subjective? It needed today's piss and shit poured all over it.
It isn't a topic. It's a language niggers use. Look at those bots.
It was created by who and why. Tell me this. It was created by prejudice. A prejudice to being taught or having something explained. Instead it sought to shit on it and in hate. It knew best. It didn't respect. It had a chip on its shoulder.
Fuck off nigger
TREND, verb - "to have a particular direction"...ones choice to love or hate the suggestions (bots) by others shapes the particular direction of the suggested.
Trends feed off consent...
The reactions of those who "love" suggested are influenced by those who "hate" suggested...others generate suggestions to shape reactors and influencers.
Recent example...jewtube influencers and their reacting audiences.
Shaping a suggestible word out of perceivable sound...does that represent creation (out of nothing) or transmutation (out of everything)?
Notice that explaining to one another by suggestion implies...subjective to subjective, while ignoring objective (perceivable).
What if nature impresses (loss) so that those within nature can express (growth) or choose to ignore that by subjecting themselves to one another?
FACT, noun [Latin factum, facio] - "any thing done, or that comes to pass; an act; a deed; an effect produced"...
a) how can a subjective reaction produce a factual action?
b) what about...action (inception towards death) producing reaction (life), hence being subject (living) within object (process of dying)?
c) why are the few suggesting the consenting many rhetoric like "just do it" or "facism" or "factories" or "fact-check" etc.?
TOP'IC, noun (Latin topicus, topica) - "any subject of discourse or argument"; because if everyone represents a subject; then everything suggested to one another represents a topic within an argument (conflict of reason).
Anyone who still uses twitter or reddit BEHAVES like a robot whether they are one or not.
Most people are just robots. They put a mask on because they were programmed to do it. They let lying jews inoculate them because they were programmed to do it.
The automated is a bot. The person above and replied too is on larger probability a bot, linking @bobsplaining. The person above might be genuine and shadowed by bots.. Are they that stupid. They open their mouth and it's blimey. It added necessary volume. What was the conversation in reply and regards towards. But their generic commenting is causing what? Support providing the advertising volume. In case the topic needed the numbers and likes.
Explain the anomaly. They've added exactly what into the topic. Nothing, instead they literally propagate support, and the advertising volume with generic replies further marking the pages with nonsense. Why?
Humans don't, it's ignorance, there are plenty of these, but why bother commenting unless you have shit to say about it? Pro or against. Seriously. Although there are paid commentators. But if you're paid to comment, won't you attack it, or support it. Instead of, tell me this.
The immediate bottom two are bots. The first one could be but is shadowed by bots. The first could be another bot all they said was shit. Who tweets feining ignorance? Why? Support for advertising volume. Artifical likes. It needs to have the supposed numbers, showing activity.
Humans just get dumber.
No I am not guessing. Like the topic poster, I am gauging the probability. We know twitter is overrun by bots. Like the rest of social media. What are they supporting, adding the numbers and volume in? It needed to show activity. It inserts bots. They mouth breathe bullshit. Next we have John Doe being explained.
Ughh i hated Marketing in college. One of my least favorite subjects.
I am not disputing with you which twitter reply is automated bot, paid shill, or otherwise.
It's hard to tell a real person online from a bot. Do you think that is moreso because people's behavior has been engineered to be robotic? Or because bots became so much smarter thanks to the speed of computer processors, data retention and refined programming? A combination of both I reckon. I think I was merely mocking the idea that people behave so robotically these days that it's become so difficult to differentiate a dumb fucking algorithm versus a dumb fucking person with a mask on typing a tweet.
Look at these dumb humans. What opinion did they have. Nothing but advertising numbers providing a common poll, often of likes, showing activity. Although any data collection behind genuine posts, is doing far more. It spins it. Until everything sooner becomes an agenda driven, driving the advertising where it needs the numbers and the volume spinning it for its topics and persona's.
But yea it has become the dumbing down of civilization as it bombards advertising and narratives.
I question the humanity. Who does that, look at us in every topic. We even fight about it. We as humans have an opinion. We defend them.
We don't offer nothing.
Apart from that idiot below turning the topic into nonsense.
They are categorically bots. Or their brains were fried by them.