Schadenfreude runs deep amongst the low IQ
(en.m.wikipedia.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
I am going to shout out bullshit. Psychobabble. Nonsense. Conjecture.
It even defeats its own logic on high self esteemed low self esteem in psychological causes. Read its analysis.
It is hypothesized that this inverse relationship is mediated through the human psychological inclination to define and protect their self- and in-group- identity or self-conception.[5] Specifically, for someone with high self-esteem, seeing another person fail may still bring them a small (but effectively negligible) surge of confidence because the observer's high self-esteem significantly lowers the threat they believe the visibly-failing human poses to their status or identity. Since this confident individual perceives that, regardless of circumstances, the successes and failures of the other person will have little impact on their own status or well-being, they have very little emotional investment in how the other person fares, be it positive or negative.
Conversely, for someone with low self-esteem, someone who is more successful poses a threat to their sense of self, and seeing this person fall can be a source of comfort because they perceive a relative improvement in their internal or in-group standing.
This bullshit word excuses wealth and blames poverty.
It is nonsense. How did wealth amass their fortune and don't they derive the same Schadenfreude? Pleasure off another's failures if it profits. Tell me why then don't we all have the same wealth. Because of the pleasure of another's failures. How come it is wealth that considers itself with esteem.
Completely fucking bullshit. Hey shrink shove it up your Schadenfreude.
so mad he pegged you - lol
The only pegging was when your brain fell out your ass. Dumbass. You're on retard account. What happened to the last one. Did the Mod fuck you.
you got pegged when you took the jab, now your brain is dissolving and your going to die suddenly and then the spirits can deal with your dumb ass. They have a plan to deal you an eternity of pain, enjoy.
Perceivable sound animates resonance/dissonance reactions from perceiving instruments...suggested words tempt one to ignore that. Words are held within mind/memory, hence distorting ones perspective within ongoing sound.
Sensing implies ones reaction (perceiving) to being animated by (perceivable)...suggested "nonsense" (to perceive nothing) tempts one to ignore that.
CONJECT, verb - "to throw together"...aka the suggested inversion of nature setting itself (perceivable whole) apart (perceiving partials). Ignoring this represents ONEs lack of self discernment.
ONE implies apart from other ones...not together.
Can you list a couple of mankind's greatest victories within the conflicts of reason/logic; like...us vs them; rich vs poor, truth vs lies; belief vs disbelief; on vs off; good vs evil etc.?
What represents the biggest win logic has ever achieved?