Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

9
Elon Musk has a QAnon following (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by user20461 2 years ago by user20461 +11 / -2
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– glownigger8675309 4 points 2 years ago +6 / -2

who the fuck is "qanon"???

there's Q. there's anons. there is no fucking "qanon.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TallestSkil 2 points 2 years ago +5 / -3

It’s the original name for the character in the first months after it began posting. The name is in line with its imageboard predecessors—FBIanon, CIAanon, etc. The people who were either proven to be real leakers or just LARPing about it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– glownigger8675309 3 points 2 years ago +5 / -2

no, Q was just Q. FBIanon, Meganon, et.al. were given (or appropriated) the "anon" add-on very early in their relative posting careers. i know, because i was following Q pre-tripcode. about a week before Mega had her meltdown.

Q was never Qanon. it was one of the things us q-tards laughed about when normies tried to talk knowledgeably about Q. the "anon" modifier didn't become a regular thing among q followers until sometime after Biden's inaugural.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– TallestSkil -2 points 2 years ago +2 / -4

Q was never Qanon.

I literally just told you that you were wrong.

FBIanon, Meganon, et.al. were given (or appropriated) the "anon" add-on very early in their relative posting careers.

The same happened with Q-LARP. Whether it ever referred to itself as anything other than Q is irrelevant; others did say “Qanon” (and it’s the… what the hell? My autocorrect just made the A lowercase. Does… it know about this shit?)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– glownigger8675309 3 points 2 years ago +4 / -1

I literally just told you that you were wrong.

lol. and who the fuck are you to tell anyone anything? all you do is shit up comment sections. you STILL haven' posted anything on the site, coward.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– user20461 [S] 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1

I'll play along with your charade of pretending not to be a qtard

https://communities.win/search?params=qanon&community=GreatAwakening

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– glownigger8675309 1 point 2 years ago +3 / -2

i was 100% a glued-to-my-laptop qtard from pre-tripcode thru shortly after Biden's inaugural. it was ALWAYS just "Q"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– VeilOfReality 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Everyone who cultivated a personality on the chans was referred to as "X anon". Q was called Q anon in the early days following that same pattern

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– glownigger8675309 -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

No. "Q" was always just "Q".

One of the first major attempts at collating and explaining the drops. Notice the title is "The Book of Q", not "The Book of Qanon". Also worth noting not once is Q referred to as Qanon. Look up MouthyBuddha's vids from 2018-2020. Not once is Q referred to as Qanon.

Look up the boards for yourself and see. Go to the forums from '18-'20 and try to find qultists referring to Q as Qanon. Then turn off the MSM and stop letting other people do your thinking for you.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– user20461 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +3 / -2

It never was and everyone knows it but I'm not gonna debate it anymore.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy