the real question you should be asking is why they're hiding other sciences... ie Antigravity and Free Energy .. Nikola Tesla figured all this shit over 100 years ago and it was stolen and hidden from the masses...
"you cant meter free energy" === we are living on a prision planet... A ROUND prison planet...
ill break it down in grade school terms ... because im not very smart and i cant explain it to you in mathematical terms...
mass (earth) creates a gravity well (cup) because the earth is so massive relative to the amount of water on its surface .. water will always SEEK the lowest point on any plain... thats why rivers carve out canyons over thousands of years..
when you pour water into a cup.. its stays in a cup... HOWEVER .. if you are in a space... water will NOT stay in a cup.. and guess what... it forms an ORB ... a sphere...
the greatest WELL in our solar system is the Sun... thats why all bodies in the solar system orbit the largest mass... and it goes down from there... jupiter... saturn... etc etc..
lol who made you the content gate keeper? Also i don't think iv every heard a single Jew promote geocentricism. its actually quite the opposite, seeing as all media is controlled by them.
Let's say you are right. This wouldn't explain why no aircraft fly over the south pole to pop up on the other side of the globe. There should at least be military, government, or research planes that do this. For instance if you flew from Buenos Aires to Perth, the shortest path on a globe would be almost directly over the south pole (7800 miles). I think it makes no sense that all commercial flight have lay overs in the northern hemisphere to get ya between cities in the south... but it's not like we see any non civilian craft doing it either. Meanwhile hundreds of millions of people circumnavigate east to west just fine. It all makes way more sense on a flat earth map.
I cannot prove that no one, even military, hasn't flown over the south pole, but I'm not saying you are wrong on that point.
When I dug into this before the explanation was the grave risk of death if anything goes wrong. Engines fail. This is why many planes have 2 engines. On that long flight, if 1 engine fails you would dies since your range is greatly reduced. With just 1 engine there are no emergency landing spots within range.
The fact that you haven't heard this counter argument makes me suspect that you are only listening to your side of the argument. You need to learn the other side as well or better than your side. I don't give a half shit flat or round earth, but you do. Why do I know counter arguments better than you do. It isn't a good look. If you are serious you can do better. If you cannot do better you strengthen the argument that you and people like you are a CIA disinformation conspiracy to make all conspiracy theories crazy looking to normies.
shhh... dont argue with satan...logic... facts and mathematics dont work with him...
only chaos, confusion and lying work...
WHATCU MEAN YOU PEEPO?!
Fgrav = (Gm1m2)/d2
its not magic if you educate yourself...
the real question you should be asking is why they're hiding other sciences... ie Antigravity and Free Energy .. Nikola Tesla figured all this shit over 100 years ago and it was stolen and hidden from the masses...
"you cant meter free energy" === we are living on a prision planet... A ROUND prison planet...
ill break it down in grade school terms ... because im not very smart and i cant explain it to you in mathematical terms...
mass (earth) creates a gravity well (cup) because the earth is so massive relative to the amount of water on its surface .. water will always SEEK the lowest point on any plain... thats why rivers carve out canyons over thousands of years..
when you pour water into a cup.. its stays in a cup... HOWEVER .. if you are in a space... water will NOT stay in a cup.. and guess what... it forms an ORB ... a sphere...
the greatest WELL in our solar system is the Sun... thats why all bodies in the solar system orbit the largest mass... and it goes down from there... jupiter... saturn... etc etc..
Your jewish hoax is banned here. Go fuck yourself.
lol who made you the content gate keeper? Also i don't think iv every heard a single Jew promote geocentricism. its actually quite the opposite, seeing as all media is controlled by them.
lol, don’t care. Eat shit and die, you flat faggots. You’re not welcome here.
i second that... flat earth is a glow nigger faggot hoax.. the ONLY uncensored "conspiracy" available on all normie fag platforms..
Have a look at the red lines on the map. They depict distances. Do you notice anything?
Because go fuck yourself. You don’t get to demand this shit every single fucking day. Your spam isn’t allowed here. We’re not rehashing truth.
Eat shit and die. Flat earth isn’t allowed here. Take your hoaxes somewhere else. There is no argument and no discussion to be had.
Wrong. Drown yourself, paid shill. You’re not allowed to spam your hoaxes here.
Not a lot of places to do an emergency landing in Antarctica.
Lot of emergency landings around the north pole for full size commercial jets?
Yes, they are within range. That is why there are commercial flights over the top but not under the bottom.
Let's say you are right. This wouldn't explain why no aircraft fly over the south pole to pop up on the other side of the globe. There should at least be military, government, or research planes that do this. For instance if you flew from Buenos Aires to Perth, the shortest path on a globe would be almost directly over the south pole (7800 miles). I think it makes no sense that all commercial flight have lay overs in the northern hemisphere to get ya between cities in the south... but it's not like we see any non civilian craft doing it either. Meanwhile hundreds of millions of people circumnavigate east to west just fine. It all makes way more sense on a flat earth map.
I cannot prove that no one, even military, hasn't flown over the south pole, but I'm not saying you are wrong on that point.
When I dug into this before the explanation was the grave risk of death if anything goes wrong. Engines fail. This is why many planes have 2 engines. On that long flight, if 1 engine fails you would dies since your range is greatly reduced. With just 1 engine there are no emergency landing spots within range.
The fact that you haven't heard this counter argument makes me suspect that you are only listening to your side of the argument. You need to learn the other side as well or better than your side. I don't give a half shit flat or round earth, but you do. Why do I know counter arguments better than you do. It isn't a good look. If you are serious you can do better. If you cannot do better you strengthen the argument that you and people like you are a CIA disinformation conspiracy to make all conspiracy theories crazy looking to normies.