Let's say you are right. This wouldn't explain why no aircraft fly over the south pole to pop up on the other side of the globe. There should at least be military, government, or research planes that do this. For instance if you flew from Buenos Aires to Perth, the shortest path on a globe would be almost directly over the south pole (7800 miles). I think it makes no sense that all commercial flight have lay overs in the northern hemisphere to get ya between cities in the south... but it's not like we see any non civilian craft doing it either. Meanwhile hundreds of millions of people circumnavigate east to west just fine. It all makes way more sense on a flat earth map.
I cannot prove that no one, even military, hasn't flown over the south pole, but I'm not saying you are wrong on that point.
When I dug into this before the explanation was the grave risk of death if anything goes wrong. Engines fail. This is why many planes have 2 engines. On that long flight, if 1 engine fails you would dies since your range is greatly reduced. With just 1 engine there are no emergency landing spots within range.
The fact that you haven't heard this counter argument makes me suspect that you are only listening to your side of the argument. You need to learn the other side as well or better than your side. I don't give a half shit flat or round earth, but you do. Why do I know counter arguments better than you do. It isn't a good look. If you are serious you can do better. If you cannot do better you strengthen the argument that you and people like you are a CIA disinformation conspiracy to make all conspiracy theories crazy looking to normies.
Let's say you are right. This wouldn't explain why no aircraft fly over the south pole to pop up on the other side of the globe. There should at least be military, government, or research planes that do this. For instance if you flew from Buenos Aires to Perth, the shortest path on a globe would be almost directly over the south pole (7800 miles). I think it makes no sense that all commercial flight have lay overs in the northern hemisphere to get ya between cities in the south... but it's not like we see any non civilian craft doing it either. Meanwhile hundreds of millions of people circumnavigate east to west just fine. It all makes way more sense on a flat earth map.
I cannot prove that no one, even military, hasn't flown over the south pole, but I'm not saying you are wrong on that point.
When I dug into this before the explanation was the grave risk of death if anything goes wrong. Engines fail. This is why many planes have 2 engines. On that long flight, if 1 engine fails you would dies since your range is greatly reduced. With just 1 engine there are no emergency landing spots within range.
The fact that you haven't heard this counter argument makes me suspect that you are only listening to your side of the argument. You need to learn the other side as well or better than your side. I don't give a half shit flat or round earth, but you do. Why do I know counter arguments better than you do. It isn't a good look. If you are serious you can do better. If you cannot do better you strengthen the argument that you and people like you are a CIA disinformation conspiracy to make all conspiracy theories crazy looking to normies.