incongruous moon landing shadows
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
Easier to waste trillions of dollars in R&D than actually go to the moon.
They sure spend a lot of money on the DUMS.
Yea and I imagine stocking them with shit isnt cheap either, remember all those weird shortages for things like kids medications and food condiments. As well as the millions of cows and chickens that were supposedly killed in freak fires. Coincidences, im sure ^^.
Underage hookers and blow.
honestly, since underage hookers and blow are going to happen anyway, i wish planners would just make a line item for that budget rather than surreptitiously siphoning off funds from legit projects.
Ive seen you link this video before. I always open it up but even the title irks me wrong. Not really reoccurring ice ages. Its one ice age with reoccurring interglacials. Skipping through it I can see something about gods judgement haha. Sorry but god couldnt stop what is coming even if he wanted to.
When you say glass beads I think of the ones that are created during meteorite impacts, like the ones china supposedly discovered.
For some reason your comment made me think about the glass, vitrified forts. Almost like humanity was either under attack, or the earth was getting scorched by something like plasma. It's funny in plato's atlantis, one of the big secrets the egyptian priest share, is that earth is periodically cleansed with either water or fire. If its water the ones in the low lying areas are swept into the sea, and if its fire, the people high in the mountains are burned to death. There are even patches of glass in the middle of the desert, their best guess is meteorites as well, but considering there are no impact craters. The fact that they seem to be localized, meaning no wide swaths of destruction make me lean towards it being the result of some kind of thermonuclear weapon.
Fun fact, did you know mars suffered a nuclear explosion I guess after the oceans dried up and the atmosphere disappeared.
Wasnt cydonia where they took pictures of the face and pyramids that later turned out to be a hill or something they claimed?
I mean, if you believe that kinda stuff.
https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2015/eposter/2660.pdf
This really explains the science behind it if you want to understand it. One of the hypothesis is that it was the result of a thermonuclear weapon, partly because it didnt leave a crater.
I'm with you. I think there's a breakaway civilization and that the tech/physics to get into space is alot simpler than we're led to believe.
imho, one of NASA's roles is to psy-op people into thinking getting off-planet takes vast resources and a huge power expenditure to generate the force required. the actual tech required and physics to understand is probably fairly simple. the kind of thing a couple 21st cenury Wright Brothers could build in their garage.
again imho, i think the Hutchison Effect guy was probably flirting with some of the physics principles involved in modulating whatever it is we call "gravitation". his focus wasn't on generating a propulsion system, though.
Oh, i assure you sir/madame - the embezzlement is quite real.
The rest of it is hollywood ;)
What if we flew all the way there and forgot to take the lens cap off
I'd say that's the most benign of the plausible explanations. On the other end, we could have been stopped from filming by the moons inhabitants.