Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

12
()
posted 2 years ago by DrLeaks 2 years ago by DrLeaks +14 / -2
9 comments share
9 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

You haven't seen all the documents. There were reportedly 100s.

The one paper. It is in various colors, it requires a print out, access code, entry, copier. Even civilians have better protocols. As in code to access the copier. Most have cctv in their building. Or server records. Record of access, and prints. On multiple tiers. They require access codes for any layers of archive. Requiring access permissions. Example banking. Security. Accounting. Property. Etc name them. Even retail. You know this. We all do.

It's remarkable an entire trove of documents was accessible, by a low tier operative.

It is factually obscene. Not possible.

When certain documents had the access codes on them. Not the access code, that individualised to your permission. But the archive code. He in this video is directly commenting from a code only accessible to the CIA.

Who has all the permissions. Only senior staff. Directors of national security. Or senior governance.

There are breaches to mainframes, servers. Again there are logs, logins, print outs, permissions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Iknowitsu 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

I have yet to see 100s of documents.

The info your relying on to discredit him is only being reported by msm outlets.

So far I’ve seen 18 pages of stuff but nothing else.

When tons of people start saying “don’t read this, it’s not important”, you bet your ass I’m gonna read it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Nobody has seen them all. They just pop up in the press.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jack-teixeira-national-guard-pentagon-arrest-b2319665.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/07/us/politics/classified-documents-leak.html

More than 100.

At what point. His clearance has permission yes. It accesses a particular archive. If it downloads, or prints, there are records. Even your home computer has records, and scripts. Never mind secure access databases for top secrets. Because any archive has layers for its individual permissions. As I.T support perhaps there are some means to breach an archive, this isn't very easy, if he had credentials to support it. But it would be remarkable because they aren't stored on random bases, granting unlimited access. Back to the topic video. The documents had archive codes on them, one from the commentator is CIA only. Not military. It can only be accessed by top personnel.

Aside some of the documents seen were copies. They had different types of ink. They also had archive codes.

What the fuck is a national guard janitor, grooming a cult of leakers for the perfect leak. He sat on Minecraft waiting for the fact checkers? Seriously.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy