Anyone who reads moonofalabama already knew all of this and wouldn’t have been surprised.
The ammunition shortage? Observant people knew this was coming.
Chances of spring offensive…weak? Observant people already knew this.
Nato on the ground with special forces? Observant people already knew this (why else would you have decapitated corpses with hands removed?).
Troops losses inaccurate? Ukraine losses higher than reported? Anyone with a brain who saw what was happening in Bakmhut (and all along the front), in terms of artillery… knew this.
Makes sense he would leak it to his friends. Probably had some Slava Ukraine msm dipshit as a friend and wanted to shut them up.
You haven't seen all the documents. There were reportedly 100s.
The one paper. It is in various colors, it requires a print out, access code, entry, copier. Even civilians have better protocols. As in code to access the copier. Most have cctv in their building. Or server records. Record of access, and prints. On multiple tiers. They require access codes for any layers of archive. Requiring access permissions. Example banking. Security. Accounting. Property. Etc name them. Even retail. You know this. We all do.
It's remarkable an entire trove of documents was accessible, by a low tier operative.
It is factually obscene. Not possible.
When certain documents had the access codes on them. Not the access code, that individualised to your permission. But the archive code. He in this video is directly commenting from a code only accessible to the CIA.
Who has all the permissions. Only senior staff. Directors of national security. Or senior governance.
There are breaches to mainframes, servers. Again there are logs, logins, print outs, permissions.
At what point. His clearance has permission yes. It accesses a particular archive. If it downloads, or prints, there are records. Even your home computer has records, and scripts. Never mind secure access databases for top secrets. Because any archive has layers for its individual permissions. As I.T support perhaps there are some means to breach an archive, this isn't very easy, if he had credentials to support it. But it would be remarkable because they aren't stored on random bases, granting unlimited access. Back to the topic video. The documents had archive codes on them, one from the commentator is CIA only. Not military. It can only be accessed by top personnel.
Aside some of the documents seen were copies. They had different types of ink. They also had archive codes.
What the fuck is a national guard janitor, grooming a cult of leakers for the perfect leak. He sat on Minecraft waiting for the fact checkers? Seriously.
I disagree.
This wasn’t even that sensitive of intelligence.
Anyone who reads moonofalabama already knew all of this and wouldn’t have been surprised.
The ammunition shortage? Observant people knew this was coming.
Chances of spring offensive…weak? Observant people already knew this.
Nato on the ground with special forces? Observant people already knew this (why else would you have decapitated corpses with hands removed?).
Troops losses inaccurate? Ukraine losses higher than reported? Anyone with a brain who saw what was happening in Bakmhut (and all along the front), in terms of artillery… knew this.
Makes sense he would leak it to his friends. Probably had some Slava Ukraine msm dipshit as a friend and wanted to shut them up.
Looks organic to me.
You haven't seen all the documents. There were reportedly 100s.
The one paper. It is in various colors, it requires a print out, access code, entry, copier. Even civilians have better protocols. As in code to access the copier. Most have cctv in their building. Or server records. Record of access, and prints. On multiple tiers. They require access codes for any layers of archive. Requiring access permissions. Example banking. Security. Accounting. Property. Etc name them. Even retail. You know this. We all do.
It's remarkable an entire trove of documents was accessible, by a low tier operative.
It is factually obscene. Not possible.
When certain documents had the access codes on them. Not the access code, that individualised to your permission. But the archive code. He in this video is directly commenting from a code only accessible to the CIA.
Who has all the permissions. Only senior staff. Directors of national security. Or senior governance.
There are breaches to mainframes, servers. Again there are logs, logins, print outs, permissions.
I have yet to see 100s of documents.
The info your relying on to discredit him is only being reported by msm outlets.
So far I’ve seen 18 pages of stuff but nothing else.
When tons of people start saying “don’t read this, it’s not important”, you bet your ass I’m gonna read it.
Nobody has seen them all. They just pop up in the press.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jack-teixeira-national-guard-pentagon-arrest-b2319665.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/07/us/politics/classified-documents-leak.html
More than 100.
At what point. His clearance has permission yes. It accesses a particular archive. If it downloads, or prints, there are records. Even your home computer has records, and scripts. Never mind secure access databases for top secrets. Because any archive has layers for its individual permissions. As I.T support perhaps there are some means to breach an archive, this isn't very easy, if he had credentials to support it. But it would be remarkable because they aren't stored on random bases, granting unlimited access. Back to the topic video. The documents had archive codes on them, one from the commentator is CIA only. Not military. It can only be accessed by top personnel.
Aside some of the documents seen were copies. They had different types of ink. They also had archive codes.
What the fuck is a national guard janitor, grooming a cult of leakers for the perfect leak. He sat on Minecraft waiting for the fact checkers? Seriously.