Vaccines have never worked. Not ever.
(twitter.com)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
My children are completely unvaccinated and perfectly healthy
No regrets
I'm not going to lie, not vaccinating my child was a scary choice. He's now miles ahead of all his friends (3 year olds, yeah I know not much) but he's more active, more verbal, better problem solver, more extroverted, and just seems overall healthier, he goes through colds in one day, as opposed to his friends that can take over a week. And this is by a lot. Just my 2 cents.
Good for you. I’m not that far ahead of you as my eldest is 5 but my kids are rarely sick and when they do get sick it’s the sniffles for a day or two and they’re fine. But the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated kids is night and day, With boys especially they get vaccine damaged. Some of our friends do not vaccinate their children but most do. The vaccinated kids are sickly and developmentally delayed and have allergies. Speech therapy and adenoid surgery and shit. My sons are less kamikaze than the general public , I’ve never had to take them to urgent care because one was a retard who ran into a coffee table or some shit and had to get stitches. I think vaccines damage spatial awareness of toddler boys. I can’t tell you how many nonfunctional children I’ve seen out and about and it’s not like I’m out looking for them
Aren't you worried that your kid won't fit in with all the retarded kids whose parents vaccinated them properly (at least 23 shots by 2)?
I spend little time with other peoples children but when I do at church or other gatherings it’s harrowing the difference between the little vaxtard kids and the unvaxxed kids. The little vaxtard kids are spastic window lickers. Not gonna pretend like my kids are geniuses-they are my children after all- but they’re not screechy little autist retards
100%
The problem is they want to give you a vaccine for an ever increasing list of ailments many of which are preventable, or not very severe (like the flu). When I was growing up I think 5 vaccines were required and they were for the big diseases......
"follow the money" comes to mind.
when i was growing up, it was not legal for drug makers to publicly advertise on TV or radio.
pssttt newsflash!!!
viruses are hardcore at first, but lose their rigor very fast. and guess what? they have to combat nature EVERY SECOND to find a way to stay alive. so they get weaker by doing this
mindblown
wooahhh duddeeee
Real talk tho: viruses are fake and gay.
A virus has never been observed or isolated (e.g., in the Koch's Postulates sense, or any other sense); they only exist in theory. The only image ever even supposedly taken of a virus, in less than one second, can be easily recognized as a nucleotide from cellular mitochondrial DNA. You might have the instinct to think "well of course we can't see them because they are way too small", but I would have to remind you that we build micro processors out of the smaller components than supposed coronavirus, let alone some of the larger viruses which should be visible under an optical microscope.
This isn't true. It's what's called 'theory blindness' -- not on your part, but on that of the 'virologists'.
Nah some vaccines are proven, tested, and important medical technology. The tetnus shot for example. Now when we step on a rusty nail, we don't die anymore.
The Covid shot through, 100% horseshit.
The tetanus shot is also bullshit. The whole rusty nail story- also bullshit. My doctor said getting tetanus is ridiculously rare.
Thanks muh vax! 🙏
🤣😂🤣
speaking of "100% horseshit"
i have seen multiple reports that no one in history has ever died of tetnus
Would you willingly contract it?
"it" is a bacteria - not a virus. very rare. most people don't die from it. those that do often have other commodities. sound familiar?
to your question: i would probably not willingly inject any bacteria into my bloodstream. just because i won't die from doing it doesn't mean it's a good idea.
more to the point: tetnus vaccines are worthless - at best - just more toxins in practice.
Be fair to vaccines, they are among the many causes, mostly better hygiene, of a reduction in all infectious diseases. Few but vaccine shills say they were the only cause.
Germ theory opponents hardest hit?
By that measure, vitamin C & D work too - and should be considered "vaccines".
Not under the definition of vaccine that the world operated under before they changed it to include mRNA injections, but I understand what you're saying and generally agree.
correct - and assuming the legacy definition was ever sufficiently accurate.
Ask the next vaxtard you see whether he would prefer to be stranded on a desert isle with a) antibiotics and clean water or b) every vaccine on the planet
I guarantee they will choose the latter. Encourage him to get a triple portion of the cutter polio
I don't think people deny the science behind vaccines, the question is at what cost?
Sadly, there is no science behind vaccines. I know that seems odd, since so many 'scientists' are being paid to study them, but they're not doing science.
It must be true because some random guy says so in Twitter
Card? Pffft...check out my tattoo!
It must be false because some random guy says so in this forum.
that's for you to decide - i gave you the link for a reason.
Because you are gullible and believe random people from twitter?
generally not
faster than i believe anonymous users on conspiracies.win lol!
So why do you believe this guy?
its' not just this guy - he's not the only one presenting these data sets
i have spent some time conducting deeper research of the topic, and suffice it to say: i found no dataset that was ultimately compelling
"follow the money" also comes to mind
that's all i have time for right now - take care and cheers
There is no data set being presented.
define "data set"