His research is very well done, I disagree with him on a few spiritual points as he seems to believe in reincarnation.
Tons of quotes, going back to false flags like the Lusitania to send us into WW1, one terrorist false flag after another. How the FBI/cia grooms people to commit acts for them, how the financial system is designed to enslave us... He lays out how mind control works (in the first chapter), how they hijack the language (using "anti" and "dis" to cause a negative emotion so people don't want to be labeled those things and avoid investigating).
Obviously, buy if you can, but here's the archive where that quote was found.
Lots of Mossad stuff the chapter prior but all the 9/11 stuff just upsets me all over again that it's been 22 years and we had all that proof and people wouldn't wake up. The archive link starts just after that stuff though.
The way he lays out quote after quote to back everything up is extremely well done, it's why I left the archive link so you can look at a few pages to see. There's got to be 500 quotes in there worth saving.
a) RE (response to) IN (being within) CARNAL (pertaining to flesh) -ATION (through action)...that represents ones status quo while living within the process of dying aka flesh responding to, while being within motion.
b) rebirth aka response to NATURE, noun [Latin born, produced]
c) transmigration aka motion (male) to momentum (female) for trans-form (life's migration from inception towards death).
d) metempsychosis aka META (change) EN (within) PSCHYE (spirit: spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of form within to change outside).
how they hijack the language (using "anti" and "dis" to cause a negative emotion so people don't want to be labeled those things and avoid investigating).
Reason (want versus not want) implies ANTI (against, versus) DIS (lack of), hence lacking perceivable (need) when consenting to reason (want vs not want) over suggested.
As for hijacking language...suggested words over perceivable sound represents spell-craft. Nature doesn't label; it designates units (ones) through self division (whole into partial).
this country is done. the media, together with the degenerate sick twisted mentally ill deviant radical marxists, have taken control of our systems. they did this over the course of MANY years. they are now making their final moves for total control.
The few suggest SYSTEM (Greek systema; from syn) - "to place together" as the inversion of nature setting itself apart, hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving).
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) + tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) + equality (same) through diversity (difference) + united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; unilever; universal pictures + compound interest + mass migration + collectivism + melting pot + world wide web and so on...all representing "to place together".
To be implies ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying)...
Nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...the few conceal perceivable with suggested narratives.
in their language
Nature communicates perceivable sound, those within tempt each other with suggested words to ignore that.
their plan
Nature represents ongoing motion, those within represent temporary resistance. The few utilize the ongoing by tempting the temporary within to ignore the ongoing, hence by suggesting them to hold onto temporary instead of resisting ongoing.
It's not about the few planing to rule the world; it's about them managing the many, who willingly ignore that only nature sets the rules.
For example...suggesting a new world order tempts the many to ignore that there's only one natural order (inception towards death) for everyone (life) within. The trick is that the old world order; the present world order and the new world order represent suggested narratives to distract the many from the perceivable natural order.
from the beginning
Beginning (inception) towards end (death) represents the momentum for the temporary life within. What each one alive has to discern for oneself is a) ones position within momentum (choice at the center of surrounding balance) and b) that momentum (balance of motion) implies being generated by ongoing motion.
Notice that while alive; one cannot perceive ones inception and death. Why? Because life exists "in-between", hence being transmuted from surrounding (whole) into and out of center (partial) momentarily.
tl; dr...the few cannot conceal without revealing what they're concealing. The foundation (perceivable) exists no matter what others build upon it (suggested)...those with eyes to see don't view the world through the lens of suggested information; but within perceivable inspiration.
That's the issue...suggested information tempts one to want to hold onto; while perceivable inspiration needs to be let go. Everything formed within a flow-state tempts one to save it...self sustenance implies the need to resist the want to save; to hold onto; to possess; to own etc.
a) consent to suggested terrror-ism gives those suggesting the power of consent to define, redefine and contradict TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] Ones consent gives others the power to shape fears through suggestion.
b) consenting to suggested implies BOTH want and not want, in this case, both hope (want) and fear (not want).
c) wanting or not wanting suggested outcomes; tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
d) ones (life) origin implies motion (inception towards death)...ignoring to resist being moved by motion represents EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.], hence from ones position as the resistance (living) within motion (process of dying).
e) lack of resistance within perceivable implies opportunity for exploitation through suggestion.
submissive state
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for submission by free will of choice.
childlike
Childhood innocence implies adulthood guilt...guilty of ignoring response-ability (free will of choice) when one consents to submit to the suggestions of the "chosen ones".
behavior can then be controlled
Behave aka "being + having" can be controlled by suggesting others to want to have what one suggests, which in return tempts the perceiving one to ignore being within and having access to everything perceivable.
his powers of reason are clouded
Consenting to suggested (want or not want) implies ignorance of perceivable (need)...ignorance represents the cloud, reasoning (want versus not want) among others about suggested represents the storm.
The few utilize suggestion (-isms) to divide (reason) the many, while sustaining the conflicts of reason as the state of WAR, noun (Greek, to perplex, embroil, disturb) within the minds/memories of the many, which gives the few control over both sides of every conflict, plus the power of mass consent to be able to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
Reasoning for the many represents a) reactionary conflicts about suggestions by the few; b) conflicts among the many with the few out of reach and c) an imbalanced; conflict oriented; versus mindset.
Found in this book by Feargus O'Connor Greenwood.
Amazon - 180 Degrees: Unlearn The Lies You've Been Taught To Believe
Philosophers-stone has an interview about it on Bitchute, "This book is explosive"
SGT Report also interviewed him "elite pedo's run the world"
His research is very well done, I disagree with him on a few spiritual points as he seems to believe in reincarnation.
Tons of quotes, going back to false flags like the Lusitania to send us into WW1, one terrorist false flag after another. How the FBI/cia grooms people to commit acts for them, how the financial system is designed to enslave us... He lays out how mind control works (in the first chapter), how they hijack the language (using "anti" and "dis" to cause a negative emotion so people don't want to be labeled those things and avoid investigating).
Obviously, buy if you can, but here's the archive where that quote was found.
Lots of Mossad stuff the chapter prior but all the 9/11 stuff just upsets me all over again that it's been 22 years and we had all that proof and people wouldn't wake up. The archive link starts just after that stuff though.
The way he lays out quote after quote to back everything up is extremely well done, it's why I left the archive link so you can look at a few pages to see. There's got to be 500 quotes in there worth saving.
I’ll check it out. Thanks for the rec!
a) RE (response to) IN (being within) CARNAL (pertaining to flesh) -ATION (through action)...that represents ones status quo while living within the process of dying aka flesh responding to, while being within motion.
b) rebirth aka response to NATURE, noun [Latin born, produced]
c) transmigration aka motion (male) to momentum (female) for trans-form (life's migration from inception towards death).
d) metempsychosis aka META (change) EN (within) PSCHYE (spirit: spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of form within to change outside).
Reason (want versus not want) implies ANTI (against, versus) DIS (lack of), hence lacking perceivable (need) when consenting to reason (want vs not want) over suggested.
As for hijacking language...suggested words over perceivable sound represents spell-craft. Nature doesn't label; it designates units (ones) through self division (whole into partial).
https://ia902205.us.archive.org/31/items/180_20220323/180%C2%B0.pdf
exactly what is happening in america.
this country is done. the media, together with the degenerate sick twisted mentally ill deviant radical marxists, have taken control of our systems. they did this over the course of MANY years. they are now making their final moves for total control.
The few suggest SYSTEM (Greek systema; from syn) - "to place together" as the inversion of nature setting itself apart, hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving).
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) + tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) + equality (same) through diversity (difference) + united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; unilever; universal pictures + compound interest + mass migration + collectivism + melting pot + world wide web and so on...all representing "to place together".
To be implies ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying)...
That's interesting. They have made clear in their language use what their plan is from the beginning.
Nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...the few conceal perceivable with suggested narratives.
Nature communicates perceivable sound, those within tempt each other with suggested words to ignore that.
Nature represents ongoing motion, those within represent temporary resistance. The few utilize the ongoing by tempting the temporary within to ignore the ongoing, hence by suggesting them to hold onto temporary instead of resisting ongoing.
It's not about the few planing to rule the world; it's about them managing the many, who willingly ignore that only nature sets the rules.
For example...suggesting a new world order tempts the many to ignore that there's only one natural order (inception towards death) for everyone (life) within. The trick is that the old world order; the present world order and the new world order represent suggested narratives to distract the many from the perceivable natural order.
Beginning (inception) towards end (death) represents the momentum for the temporary life within. What each one alive has to discern for oneself is a) ones position within momentum (choice at the center of surrounding balance) and b) that momentum (balance of motion) implies being generated by ongoing motion.
Notice that while alive; one cannot perceive ones inception and death. Why? Because life exists "in-between", hence being transmuted from surrounding (whole) into and out of center (partial) momentarily.
tl; dr...the few cannot conceal without revealing what they're concealing. The foundation (perceivable) exists no matter what others build upon it (suggested)...those with eyes to see don't view the world through the lens of suggested information; but within perceivable inspiration.
That's a very profound statement. I'll have to save that one.
That's the issue...suggested information tempts one to want to hold onto; while perceivable inspiration needs to be let go. Everything formed within a flow-state tempts one to save it...self sustenance implies the need to resist the want to save; to hold onto; to possess; to own etc.
a) consent to suggested terrror-ism gives those suggesting the power of consent to define, redefine and contradict TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] Ones consent gives others the power to shape fears through suggestion.
b) consenting to suggested implies BOTH want and not want, in this case, both hope (want) and fear (not want).
c) wanting or not wanting suggested outcomes; tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
d) ones (life) origin implies motion (inception towards death)...ignoring to resist being moved by motion represents EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.], hence from ones position as the resistance (living) within motion (process of dying).
e) lack of resistance within perceivable implies opportunity for exploitation through suggestion.
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for submission by free will of choice.
Childhood innocence implies adulthood guilt...guilty of ignoring response-ability (free will of choice) when one consents to submit to the suggestions of the "chosen ones".
Behave aka "being + having" can be controlled by suggesting others to want to have what one suggests, which in return tempts the perceiving one to ignore being within and having access to everything perceivable.
Consenting to suggested (want or not want) implies ignorance of perceivable (need)...ignorance represents the cloud, reasoning (want versus not want) among others about suggested represents the storm.
The few utilize suggestion (-isms) to divide (reason) the many, while sustaining the conflicts of reason as the state of WAR, noun (Greek, to perplex, embroil, disturb) within the minds/memories of the many, which gives the few control over both sides of every conflict, plus the power of mass consent to be able to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
Reasoning for the many represents a) reactionary conflicts about suggestions by the few; b) conflicts among the many with the few out of reach and c) an imbalanced; conflict oriented; versus mindset.
Spot on.
You know what?
The odds are NEVER stacked in the common man's favor.
Fox News