When predators outnumber prey (and in humans, we are both). Prey populations decline, forcing the predators to starve and fight each other. This leads to a fall in the number of predators and thus a Boom in prey population until it reaches an abundance, which then attracts new predators ad eternum.
This is the circle of life as thought by science.
We are mammals. Some of us are more opportunistic than others. Some of us are more predatory than others.
Every time we "bring in migrants to fix the decline of population" we upset the natural balance of the circle of life. Pumping more prey into the system.
Preventing the collapse of the predator class, and thus never moving into the area where the prey outnumber the predators.(Note, humans can hunt far more targets than most predators, and thus require more prey)
This is why the solution to depopulation is downsizing. Downsizing means a deliberate reduction of production, profits and subsequently power. The logic dictates that if you down size there is less room for predation in your State, thus giving an natural opportunity for the prey class to repopulate, following the observations of Darwin.
I dont believe population collapse is a problem. It is a natural occurring phenomena in other mammals. We have no reason to be exempt. There is no reason to combat the very nature of existence. I dont think we can win in this peculiar instance, or that winning is a desirable outcome.
This is because both men and woman have been brainwashed into believing they should have sex with as many people as possible all the while both are looking for a better deal and the partner senses this so both hesitate on starting a family with someone they know is not sincere. Next thing you know both are middle aged.
a) consenting to suggested numbers tempts ONE into the few vs many conflict of reason.
b) consenting to suggested POPULA'TION, noun - "multiplication of inhabitants" tempts ONE to ignore representing a divided one (partial within whole).
c) consenting to suggested COUNT, verb - "to number one by one" tempts ONE to ignore representing a designated unit (one).
d) try to discern addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being partial within whole) based on ONE instead of basing math on suggested zero (0)...
<a brain lace salesman appears>
Biology 101
When predators outnumber prey (and in humans, we are both). Prey populations decline, forcing the predators to starve and fight each other. This leads to a fall in the number of predators and thus a Boom in prey population until it reaches an abundance, which then attracts new predators ad eternum.
This is the circle of life as thought by science.
We are mammals. Some of us are more opportunistic than others. Some of us are more predatory than others.
Every time we "bring in migrants to fix the decline of population" we upset the natural balance of the circle of life. Pumping more prey into the system.
Preventing the collapse of the predator class, and thus never moving into the area where the prey outnumber the predators.(Note, humans can hunt far more targets than most predators, and thus require more prey)
This is why the solution to depopulation is downsizing. Downsizing means a deliberate reduction of production, profits and subsequently power. The logic dictates that if you down size there is less room for predation in your State, thus giving an natural opportunity for the prey class to repopulate, following the observations of Darwin.
I dont believe population collapse is a problem. It is a natural occurring phenomena in other mammals. We have no reason to be exempt. There is no reason to combat the very nature of existence. I dont think we can win in this peculiar instance, or that winning is a desirable outcome.
This is because both men and woman have been brainwashed into believing they should have sex with as many people as possible all the while both are looking for a better deal and the partner senses this so both hesitate on starting a family with someone they know is not sincere. Next thing you know both are middle aged.
Ironically. But it's called technology.
a) consenting to suggested numbers tempts ONE into the few vs many conflict of reason.
b) consenting to suggested POPULA'TION, noun - "multiplication of inhabitants" tempts ONE to ignore representing a divided one (partial within whole).
c) consenting to suggested COUNT, verb - "to number one by one" tempts ONE to ignore representing a designated unit (one).
d) try to discern addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being partial within whole) based on ONE instead of basing math on suggested zero (0)...
Prepping the masses for the vaccine cull.
2023
Simping for the Musk Rat
Pathetic