It would seem that satellites have capability to upload and download large amounts of data very quickly, from let's say a 'backdoor program' installed on a computer or through modems on election day.
Would you know what form of exchange this is called and how it would work?
It would seem that satellites have capability to upload and download large amounts of data very quickly, from let's say a 'backdoor program' installed on a computer
To do that you absolutely need a high-speed infrastructure, since satellites are not endpoints of data flow. Satellites is a data channel, not datacenters where all that data comes to or from. And to do that satellite network absolutely need all that stuff - AS, uplinks and so on.
or through modems on election day.
Then, it is not a large amounts of data at all. Iridium datalink is more than enough for voting fraud if you need exclusively satellite connection for whatever reason.
Would you know what form of exchange this is called and how it would work?
I know that satellites are not data flow endpoints. They relay data from one point to another, and AFAIK they don't have tons of HDDs (the only available option for satellite for reliable data storage in space) on board to be a source or sink for data.
Robert Maxwell.......maxwell.....where have we heard that name?
...Maxwell SMART indeed
"A book written in 1997 by Fabrizio Calvi and Thierry Pfister claimed that the National Security Agency (NSA) had been "seeding computers abroad with PROMIS-embedded SMART (Systems Management Automated Reasoning Tools) chips, code-named Petrie, capable of covertly downloading data and transmitting it, using electrical wiring as an antenna, to U.S. intelligence satellites" as part of an espionage operation.
In the early 1980s, Manucher Ghorbanifar and Adnan Khashoggi both had facilitated the transaction of PROMIS software to Khalid bin Mahfouz, a prominent Saudi billionaire.
The media mogul and alleged Israeli spy Robert Maxwell was involved in selling the PROMIS software"
All that nice, but that do not make Musk satellites the end consumers or providers of information that have to be transmitted to use the alleged stuff you are talking about.
I don't care if it is true or false about all that PROMIS and whatever things. I looking at the level higher. Information is not some self-sufficient thing. It is valuable only when you able to transmit it from one point to another.
You could tell a lot of stories about how all that electronic stuff gather a tons of information, while I'm interested about paths of that information. If they gather so much information about us from within our gadgets, they must have a path for that information to flow to them. And they must have places where to store it. If 5G base stations could be theoretically used as a distributed storage for all that data, Musk satellites hardly have enough power and weight to be able to do that.
Try to make a step further in your reasonings. OK, they implanted their spy chips in everything and gathering surveillance on us. What next? Chip that gathered surveillance data is useless if that data is not transmitted somwhere. Where and how they plan to transmit that data for storage/processing/whatever? What do they need to make that, apart from spy chip and some data channel to whatever fashionable thing like satellite or 5G networks they promote or use in secret? Data got to satellite, OK, then what? How it get to final destination? By what means? And obviously, that means have to be directly connected with those who want all that surveillance crap.
It is like to talk about something like "reptiloids steal fresh water from Earth" without questioning how, for what, where, by what means and so on. More like fear porn than research and conecting dots. "See, they spy on us, they control us!" and that's all. Hate that. I want to know the whole picture, not that single tiny bit most agree to discuss.
It's shown how PROMIS was indeed able in 1997 to up and download info to satellites. I'm sure the amount of data transferred this way has increased in quantum leaps.
Transmission of various beams to a co-ordinated location. Beams of all shapes, sizes and kinds, what kinds should we discuss?
In one of concern, the receiver has to be prepared to both transmit and receive.
Heavy metals in the blood......bioelectric data from body/brain.
5G base station will/does not store the data IMO.
I can name two mainframe computers in my home state that are being used to store this information as we speak. They were set up to do just that. One is military and one is not. This is what Five Eyes is about and the data used to feed Looking Glass as predictive program.
By what means. Covert Covfefe
iron oxides as nanotechnical transmit/receive signals in real time. no real need for storage, but it's done anyway.
It would seem that satellites have capability to upload and download large amounts of data very quickly, from let's say a 'backdoor program' installed on a computer or through modems on election day.
Would you know what form of exchange this is called and how it would work?
Sounds like a question for ChatGPT :)
To do that you absolutely need a high-speed infrastructure, since satellites are not endpoints of data flow. Satellites is a data channel, not datacenters where all that data comes to or from. And to do that satellite network absolutely need all that stuff - AS, uplinks and so on.
Then, it is not a large amounts of data at all. Iridium datalink is more than enough for voting fraud if you need exclusively satellite connection for whatever reason.
I know that satellites are not data flow endpoints. They relay data from one point to another, and AFAIK they don't have tons of HDDs (the only available option for satellite for reliable data storage in space) on board to be a source or sink for data.
Thank you for your reply.
I'm guessing things have progressed quite a bit/byte since 1997.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROMIS_(software)
Robert Maxwell.......maxwell.....where have we heard that name?
...Maxwell SMART indeed
"A book written in 1997 by Fabrizio Calvi and Thierry Pfister claimed that the National Security Agency (NSA) had been "seeding computers abroad with PROMIS-embedded SMART (Systems Management Automated Reasoning Tools) chips, code-named Petrie, capable of covertly downloading data and transmitting it, using electrical wiring as an antenna, to U.S. intelligence satellites" as part of an espionage operation.
In the early 1980s, Manucher Ghorbanifar and Adnan Khashoggi both had facilitated the transaction of PROMIS software to Khalid bin Mahfouz, a prominent Saudi billionaire.
The media mogul and alleged Israeli spy Robert Maxwell was involved in selling the PROMIS software"
All that nice, but that do not make Musk satellites the end consumers or providers of information that have to be transmitted to use the alleged stuff you are talking about.
I don't care if it is true or false about all that PROMIS and whatever things. I looking at the level higher. Information is not some self-sufficient thing. It is valuable only when you able to transmit it from one point to another.
You could tell a lot of stories about how all that electronic stuff gather a tons of information, while I'm interested about paths of that information. If they gather so much information about us from within our gadgets, they must have a path for that information to flow to them. And they must have places where to store it. If 5G base stations could be theoretically used as a distributed storage for all that data, Musk satellites hardly have enough power and weight to be able to do that.
Try to make a step further in your reasonings. OK, they implanted their spy chips in everything and gathering surveillance on us. What next? Chip that gathered surveillance data is useless if that data is not transmitted somwhere. Where and how they plan to transmit that data for storage/processing/whatever? What do they need to make that, apart from spy chip and some data channel to whatever fashionable thing like satellite or 5G networks they promote or use in secret? Data got to satellite, OK, then what? How it get to final destination? By what means? And obviously, that means have to be directly connected with those who want all that surveillance crap.
It is like to talk about something like "reptiloids steal fresh water from Earth" without questioning how, for what, where, by what means and so on. More like fear porn than research and conecting dots. "See, they spy on us, they control us!" and that's all. Hate that. I want to know the whole picture, not that single tiny bit most agree to discuss.
It's shown how PROMIS was indeed able in 1997 to up and download info to satellites. I'm sure the amount of data transferred this way has increased in quantum leaps.
Transmission of various beams to a co-ordinated location. Beams of all shapes, sizes and kinds, what kinds should we discuss?
In one of concern, the receiver has to be prepared to both transmit and receive.
Heavy metals in the blood......bioelectric data from body/brain.
5G base station will/does not store the data IMO.
I can name two mainframe computers in my home state that are being used to store this information as we speak. They were set up to do just that. One is military and one is not. This is what Five Eyes is about and the data used to feed Looking Glass as predictive program.
By what means. Covert Covfefe
iron oxides as nanotechnical transmit/receive signals in real time. no real need for storage, but it's done anyway.
The methods overlap.