All that nice, but that do not make Musk satellites the end consumers or providers of information that have to be transmitted to use the alleged stuff you are talking about.
I don't care if it is true or false about all that PROMIS and whatever things. I looking at the level higher. Information is not some self-sufficient thing. It is valuable only when you able to transmit it from one point to another.
You could tell a lot of stories about how all that electronic stuff gather a tons of information, while I'm interested about paths of that information. If they gather so much information about us from within our gadgets, they must have a path for that information to flow to them. And they must have places where to store it. If 5G base stations could be theoretically used as a distributed storage for all that data, Musk satellites hardly have enough power and weight to be able to do that.
Try to make a step further in your reasonings. OK, they implanted their spy chips in everything and gathering surveillance on us. What next? Chip that gathered surveillance data is useless if that data is not transmitted somwhere. Where and how they plan to transmit that data for storage/processing/whatever? What do they need to make that, apart from spy chip and some data channel to whatever fashionable thing like satellite or 5G networks they promote or use in secret? Data got to satellite, OK, then what? How it get to final destination? By what means? And obviously, that means have to be directly connected with those who want all that surveillance crap.
It is like to talk about something like "reptiloids steal fresh water from Earth" without questioning how, for what, where, by what means and so on. More like fear porn than research and conecting dots. "See, they spy on us, they control us!" and that's all. Hate that. I want to know the whole picture, not that single tiny bit most agree to discuss.
It's shown how PROMIS was indeed able in 1997 to up and download info to satellites. I'm sure the amount of data transferred this way has increased in quantum leaps.
Transmission of various beams to a co-ordinated location. Beams of all shapes, sizes and kinds, what kinds should we discuss?
In one of concern, the receiver has to be prepared to both transmit and receive.
Heavy metals in the blood......bioelectric data from body/brain.
5G base station will/does not store the data IMO.
I can name two mainframe computers in my home state that are being used to store this information as we speak. They were set up to do just that. One is military and one is not. This is what Five Eyes is about and the data used to feed Looking Glass as predictive program.
By what means. Covert Covfefe
iron oxides as nanotechnical transmit/receive signals in real time. no real need for storage, but it's done anyway.
It's shown how PROMIS was indeed able in 1997 to up and download info to satellites.
So, the data is on satellite, or downloaded from satellite. OK. Then what? Satellite is not an endpoint in either case. That data should somehow be put on satellite from somewhere or downloaded from satellite to somewhere. Where is that "somewhere"?
5G base station will/does not store the data IMO.
At least, unlike satellites, they could be equipped with data storage devices like HDD or SSD. HDDs are too heavy and fragile for satellites and SSDs have limited lifetime and they can't be easily replaced as in base stations. Also SSD are vulnerable to data corruption by cosmic rays.
I don't know for shure if 5G base stations really equipped with data storages, but that assumption is at least technically possible.
I can name two mainframe computers in my home state that are being used to store this information as we speak.
That mainframes have to had an IP address, just like satellite uplink stations. Ownership of IP addresses is public info. As soon as you know IP range assigned to satellite network and IP range assigned to data storage you could move further in your research.
The statement that "chip could connect with satellite" is senseless alone, without research of data paths.
iron oxides as nanotechnical transmit/receive signals in real time. no real need for storage
Really, I'm tired from that "nano" crap. Nearly anything you use now have nano inside. Every single MCU or IC is literally nanotechnology, so adding "nano" to anything have no any sense.
Again, transmission of signals is not self-sufficient thing. Signal have a source and destination point. You are still talking about all that "nano" crap on one end of data transmission path, completely omitting the other.
Fuck, what the hell is going on with you, people? "They have nano satellite chips in our things!!!" - "OK, let's find out who exactly getting or sending data to that chips, uncover their back channels and connections" - "No, we don't care about that, we don't need to know that, we should not talk about that, they have nano satellite chips in our things111!!!!!"
Firstly, I'm handling this with kid gloves and doling out the information you seek but haven't found. I'd suggest you re-think the idea that you're talking to someone who doesn't actually KNOW the answers and has been up on the understanding of it and discussed it with actual participants in it for decades.
What you surmise isn't possible......transmission/reception via metals in blood and reading of bio-frequencies and transferring said info....most certainly is and was to be 'Weaponized' once completed, by using this very method. Also, it isn't a 'nano chips' as one is adj and another a noun and that makes no sense. You're getting salty now as you seem to think I'm opposing you somehow. I am not, until you start asserting things that aren't true. I'm telling you that such ability does exist one needs the data to complete the understanding. This data also exists. Being one, 'classified' and two, cutting edge, it doesn't exist as Youtube video, tik tok song or casual conversation on GAW.
What the hell is going on with 'you people'.............that's pretty funny from here.
Why bite the hand that feeds you?
Again, you continue to talk about only one of endpoints of data transmission. In any data transmission you absolutely need to have at least 2 (two) endpoints. Source and destination. You talking about only one of them. Why don't you want to talk about another?
Both 'sides' of all sides using satellites to upload/download/start fires/rig elections/trigger/shut on/off/etc.
Data can be transferred via laser.....Any thing with frequency which is anything.
Hence Space Force and current Star Wars taking place.
Finding the footprint of the elephant only helps if he isn't already standing on your head. The tech has already been accomplished and the counter-work being done.
Everything is a differential variation of vibration.
I don't care how data can be transferred. I'm interested where it goes. Satellites obviously are not the endpoints of data. One endpoint is your "chips in electronics". OK, I got it. You told that million times. But what is another endpoint in your theory? Exactly.
All that nice, but that do not make Musk satellites the end consumers or providers of information that have to be transmitted to use the alleged stuff you are talking about.
I don't care if it is true or false about all that PROMIS and whatever things. I looking at the level higher. Information is not some self-sufficient thing. It is valuable only when you able to transmit it from one point to another.
You could tell a lot of stories about how all that electronic stuff gather a tons of information, while I'm interested about paths of that information. If they gather so much information about us from within our gadgets, they must have a path for that information to flow to them. And they must have places where to store it. If 5G base stations could be theoretically used as a distributed storage for all that data, Musk satellites hardly have enough power and weight to be able to do that.
Try to make a step further in your reasonings. OK, they implanted their spy chips in everything and gathering surveillance on us. What next? Chip that gathered surveillance data is useless if that data is not transmitted somwhere. Where and how they plan to transmit that data for storage/processing/whatever? What do they need to make that, apart from spy chip and some data channel to whatever fashionable thing like satellite or 5G networks they promote or use in secret? Data got to satellite, OK, then what? How it get to final destination? By what means? And obviously, that means have to be directly connected with those who want all that surveillance crap.
It is like to talk about something like "reptiloids steal fresh water from Earth" without questioning how, for what, where, by what means and so on. More like fear porn than research and conecting dots. "See, they spy on us, they control us!" and that's all. Hate that. I want to know the whole picture, not that single tiny bit most agree to discuss.
It's shown how PROMIS was indeed able in 1997 to up and download info to satellites. I'm sure the amount of data transferred this way has increased in quantum leaps.
Transmission of various beams to a co-ordinated location. Beams of all shapes, sizes and kinds, what kinds should we discuss?
In one of concern, the receiver has to be prepared to both transmit and receive.
Heavy metals in the blood......bioelectric data from body/brain.
5G base station will/does not store the data IMO.
I can name two mainframe computers in my home state that are being used to store this information as we speak. They were set up to do just that. One is military and one is not. This is what Five Eyes is about and the data used to feed Looking Glass as predictive program.
By what means. Covert Covfefe
iron oxides as nanotechnical transmit/receive signals in real time. no real need for storage, but it's done anyway.
The methods overlap.
So, the data is on satellite, or downloaded from satellite. OK. Then what? Satellite is not an endpoint in either case. That data should somehow be put on satellite from somewhere or downloaded from satellite to somewhere. Where is that "somewhere"?
At least, unlike satellites, they could be equipped with data storage devices like HDD or SSD. HDDs are too heavy and fragile for satellites and SSDs have limited lifetime and they can't be easily replaced as in base stations. Also SSD are vulnerable to data corruption by cosmic rays.
I don't know for shure if 5G base stations really equipped with data storages, but that assumption is at least technically possible.
That mainframes have to had an IP address, just like satellite uplink stations. Ownership of IP addresses is public info. As soon as you know IP range assigned to satellite network and IP range assigned to data storage you could move further in your research.
The statement that "chip could connect with satellite" is senseless alone, without research of data paths.
Really, I'm tired from that "nano" crap. Nearly anything you use now have nano inside. Every single MCU or IC is literally nanotechnology, so adding "nano" to anything have no any sense.
Again, transmission of signals is not self-sufficient thing. Signal have a source and destination point. You are still talking about all that "nano" crap on one end of data transmission path, completely omitting the other.
Fuck, what the hell is going on with you, people? "They have nano satellite chips in our things!!!" - "OK, let's find out who exactly getting or sending data to that chips, uncover their back channels and connections" - "No, we don't care about that, we don't need to know that, we should not talk about that, they have nano satellite chips in our things111!!!!!"
Firstly, I'm handling this with kid gloves and doling out the information you seek but haven't found. I'd suggest you re-think the idea that you're talking to someone who doesn't actually KNOW the answers and has been up on the understanding of it and discussed it with actual participants in it for decades.
What you surmise isn't possible......transmission/reception via metals in blood and reading of bio-frequencies and transferring said info....most certainly is and was to be 'Weaponized' once completed, by using this very method. Also, it isn't a 'nano chips' as one is adj and another a noun and that makes no sense. You're getting salty now as you seem to think I'm opposing you somehow. I am not, until you start asserting things that aren't true. I'm telling you that such ability does exist one needs the data to complete the understanding. This data also exists. Being one, 'classified' and two, cutting edge, it doesn't exist as Youtube video, tik tok song or casual conversation on GAW.
What the hell is going on with 'you people'.............that's pretty funny from here. Why bite the hand that feeds you?
Again, you continue to talk about only one of endpoints of data transmission. In any data transmission you absolutely need to have at least 2 (two) endpoints. Source and destination. You talking about only one of them. Why don't you want to talk about another?
Both 'sides' of all sides using satellites to upload/download/start fires/rig elections/trigger/shut on/off/etc.
Data can be transferred via laser.....Any thing with frequency which is anything.
Hence Space Force and current Star Wars taking place.
Finding the footprint of the elephant only helps if he isn't already standing on your head. The tech has already been accomplished and the counter-work being done.
Everything is a differential variation of vibration.
WWG1WGA
God is One
I don't care how data can be transferred. I'm interested where it goes. Satellites obviously are not the endpoints of data. One endpoint is your "chips in electronics". OK, I got it. You told that million times. But what is another endpoint in your theory? Exactly.