Jason Breshears (Archaix) claims around May 15 2040 based on a recurring 138 year cycle iirc. And Ben Davidson (Suspicious0bservers) claims within a period between 2036 to 2048/2052(?) iirc based on several datasets of geological & solar events cycles
“The government has gone to great lengths to make wearing the mask look insane, but do not succumb to this social engineering. In the event of a real epidemic, it is advisable that both sick people and those who come in contact with them wear masks.”
This author is a mask pusher, with no understanding of medicine, statistics, or science.
The author claims that there is a 52 year cycle of natural disasters, and 2023 is the start of the next one. He then sources several pages of natural disasters that happened within a few years of one of these cycles. He uses this as evidence to back his claim. However, he fails to mention the 1000s of other natural disasters that did NOT fit into this 52 year cycle.
If 2023 is the start of a new cycle, then the following are also the starts of new cycles:
Here is a list of the 11 largest and most violent volcanic eruptions in history with known dates [1]:
Mount Vesuvius — Italy, 79 A.D.
Huaynaputina — Peru, 1600
Laki — Iceland, 1783
Krakatoa — Sunda Strait, 1883
Santa Maria Volcano — Guatemala, 1902
Novarupta — Alaska, 1912
Mount Pinatubo — Philippines, 1991
-Ambrym Island — Republic of Vanuatu, 50 A.D.
Mount Ilopango — El Salvador, 450 A.D.
Baitoushan Volcano — China, 1000 A.D.
-Mount Tambora — Indonesia, 1815
Only 2 of the 11 eruptions are within 5 years of one of these 52 year cycles. This author is a hack and peddling nonsense.
Can you provide historical record of these past cataclysms?
For your theory to work, you have to be more than just vague about proof of this occurring in the past and how it was explained away or why it is being hidden from history books and other scapegoats put in its place.
I like the natural disaster covered by human caused events. Its interesting.
Ya might wanna talk a look at Archaix stuff. Jason Breshears has done a lot of historical research thats unavailable to most of us. He has a lot on youtube also.
Yet the stars rotation direction is different in the north than the south. If stars were placed on a dome or some sort of roof they should all rotate in the same direction.
Additionally what is height of the sun? Or the North Star? Or dome/roof? If you use the 3,000 miles height for the sun then it doesn't work because at the distances we have, perspective would not be sufficient to make the sun look like it is setting the way it does, if the sun height is less then it would not give the observations we have around the world.
The way I see it, NASA didn't go to the moon, space videos are probably all fake and satellites might be all balloons but the earth is not flat. But what's truly important is that we become free from the jewish israeli yoke. Afterwards we can have the luxury to sort out any details
I agree that most people who usually refute fall earth and call others names never really understand perspective or usually just make many false assumptions. And they are on the side of the majority so they feel empowered. And yes, we all get fed all sorts of lies when we grow-up: Big bang, evolution, germ theory, Einstein's relativity are all lies.
In regards to the video you linked. Stars on a dome are not the same as crepuscular rays, dots are not lines.
you will also notice that when he tries to explain crepuscular rays he switches to the standard map instead of the flat earth map (minute 3:00) and then by minute 4:20, he makes the complete switch to a globe earth model to explain the clockwise and anti clockwise direction. He basically rotates the dome 90 degrees to explain the clockwise/anti-clockwise which breaks the whole flat earth map model. But he has done the whole thing in such a clever way that I doubt if the creator of this channel is himself simply mistaken or if he is doing it intentionally.
If you want to test for yourself why it is not possible for the stars to have different rotations in a flat earth model and at the same time also see why at the current distances we have, the sun will not appear to set the way it appears to in the ocean and test for yourself the altitude of the sun you can download and install a free 3D software called blender. It will take sometime to learn its basics. The difficult part is also in choosing the Untis you will use. For example I did this long time ago and forgot the units I used, But you can try 1 unit = 1 km or 1unit = 10 km or something and you can test with placing a sphere as the sun, and some water waves and see how the sun would move and appear when traveling away 5,000km. You get the idea
You can also test with rotating a dome with sphere on its inside.
I picked the clockwise, anti-clockwise thing and sun altitude because I know specifically that no one can go around it easily.
Apparent sun hot-spots are specular reflections with translucence and are not hot-spots, basically the same way how a mirror would reflect the sun as a small cricle, or a car body would reflect the sun as a small circle. Clouds are special because they not only reflect light but also absorb it and refract it.
Some put that date around 2040. No man knows the day or hour. I must admit that I'd rather perish than resort to cannibalism
Jason Breshears (Archaix) claims around May 15 2040 based on a recurring 138 year cycle iirc. And Ben Davidson (Suspicious0bservers) claims within a period between 2036 to 2048/2052(?) iirc based on several datasets of geological & solar events cycles
Ben Davidson is the most level headed of everyone talking about disasters. I like his take
Cannibalism vs eating another... what's the moral difference? Why would an intelligent designer cast us into a world where we eat other beings?
Thus the utopia of "The land of milk and honey". Not even plants are killed in that scenario
It's impossible for humans to think like God. Trying to guess his motives would be like trying to drink the sea.
But God has the power to shed light, so has he done so?
What do you mean by that?
“The government has gone to great lengths to make wearing the mask look insane, but do not succumb to this social engineering. In the event of a real epidemic, it is advisable that both sick people and those who come in contact with them wear masks.”
This author is a mask pusher, with no understanding of medicine, statistics, or science.
The author claims that there is a 52 year cycle of natural disasters, and 2023 is the start of the next one. He then sources several pages of natural disasters that happened within a few years of one of these cycles. He uses this as evidence to back his claim. However, he fails to mention the 1000s of other natural disasters that did NOT fit into this 52 year cycle.
If 2023 is the start of a new cycle, then the following are also the starts of new cycles:
2023, 1971, 1919, 1867, 1815, 1763, 1711, 1659, 1607… 1087, 1035, 983… 619, 567, 515, 463, 411… 151, 99, 47
Here is a list of the 11 largest and most violent volcanic eruptions in history with known dates [1]:
Mount Vesuvius — Italy, 79 A.D. Huaynaputina — Peru, 1600 Laki — Iceland, 1783 Krakatoa — Sunda Strait, 1883 Santa Maria Volcano — Guatemala, 1902 Novarupta — Alaska, 1912 Mount Pinatubo — Philippines, 1991 -Ambrym Island — Republic of Vanuatu, 50 A.D. Mount Ilopango — El Salvador, 450 A.D. Baitoushan Volcano — China, 1000 A.D. -Mount Tambora — Indonesia, 1815
Only 2 of the 11 eruptions are within 5 years of one of these 52 year cycles. This author is a hack and peddling nonsense.
Reference
[1] https://thelistwire.usatoday.com/lists/12-of-the-most-powerful-volcanic-eruptions-in-history/
You say every few hundred years.
So when was the previous one?
Can you provide historical record of these past cataclysms?
For your theory to work, you have to be more than just vague about proof of this occurring in the past and how it was explained away or why it is being hidden from history books and other scapegoats put in its place.
In no way would a world war help them keep power in the face of cataclysm. This is a retarded post for retarded people.
[search “jew”]
0 results
Fuck off, spambot.
I like the natural disaster covered by human caused events. Its interesting.
Ya might wanna talk a look at Archaix stuff. Jason Breshears has done a lot of historical research thats unavailable to most of us. He has a lot on youtube also.
The north star is not visible from south of the equator.
Yet the stars rotation direction is different in the north than the south. If stars were placed on a dome or some sort of roof they should all rotate in the same direction.
Additionally what is height of the sun? Or the North Star? Or dome/roof? If you use the 3,000 miles height for the sun then it doesn't work because at the distances we have, perspective would not be sufficient to make the sun look like it is setting the way it does, if the sun height is less then it would not give the observations we have around the world.
The way I see it, NASA didn't go to the moon, space videos are probably all fake and satellites might be all balloons but the earth is not flat. But what's truly important is that we become free from the jewish israeli yoke. Afterwards we can have the luxury to sort out any details
I agree that most people who usually refute fall earth and call others names never really understand perspective or usually just make many false assumptions. And they are on the side of the majority so they feel empowered. And yes, we all get fed all sorts of lies when we grow-up: Big bang, evolution, germ theory, Einstein's relativity are all lies.
In regards to the video you linked. Stars on a dome are not the same as crepuscular rays, dots are not lines.
you will also notice that when he tries to explain crepuscular rays he switches to the standard map instead of the flat earth map (minute 3:00) and then by minute 4:20, he makes the complete switch to a globe earth model to explain the clockwise and anti clockwise direction. He basically rotates the dome 90 degrees to explain the clockwise/anti-clockwise which breaks the whole flat earth map model. But he has done the whole thing in such a clever way that I doubt if the creator of this channel is himself simply mistaken or if he is doing it intentionally.
If you want to test for yourself why it is not possible for the stars to have different rotations in a flat earth model and at the same time also see why at the current distances we have, the sun will not appear to set the way it appears to in the ocean and test for yourself the altitude of the sun you can download and install a free 3D software called blender. It will take sometime to learn its basics. The difficult part is also in choosing the Untis you will use. For example I did this long time ago and forgot the units I used, But you can try 1 unit = 1 km or 1unit = 10 km or something and you can test with placing a sphere as the sun, and some water waves and see how the sun would move and appear when traveling away 5,000km. You get the idea
You can also test with rotating a dome with sphere on its inside.
I picked the clockwise, anti-clockwise thing and sun altitude because I know specifically that no one can go around it easily.
Apparent sun hot-spots are specular reflections with translucence and are not hot-spots, basically the same way how a mirror would reflect the sun as a small cricle, or a car body would reflect the sun as a small circle. Clouds are special because they not only reflect light but also absorb it and refract it.