On the other hand, the stuff he is covering is pretty important and he's on the right side about them. You can always find another subject and declare a source a limited hangout for not covering it but in reality they need to select. He also gets harassed by the spy agencies.
I'm suspending my judgment here. His attitude about 9/11 is damning, but he may have developed a courage now. There's a danger of us not recognizing our heroes anymore because of paranoia.
Meanwhile, yesterday, Tucker as a guest of Redacted, told exactly about importance of WTC7 question and ability to ask that question and how he was wrong at the time.
Either something changing in some parts of MSM, like they trying to hijack some undeniable conspiracy theories to head them later in necessary direction, or we will witness how Tucker will be evantually thrown out. :)
Whatever. Tucker being from the circles of interest and occasionally speaking out some tiny but interesting bits about that circles for whatever reason is at least entertaining against the background of empty and boring regular liars of MSM. :)
Tucker, the shining example of someone who hasn't changed at all over the years. If you're going to attack someone at least pretend to understand why people are listening to the person in the first place.
Perhaps because the real conspiracy of 9/11 is that Bush let it happen. WTC7, a depository of paper records with a fuel supply for a back up generator, collapsed after being on fire for 8 hours.
He's changed his position on that completely and apologized. I saw a recent video where he was saying people should be suspicious of things like building 7 or something to that effect.
Nobody is surprised by this. Or if they are, they haven't been paying attention.
Tucker/Fox/the whole MSM is a limited hangout.
A diversion for you to not to look where the problem lies, who controls the system.
On the other hand, the stuff he is covering is pretty important and he's on the right side about them. You can always find another subject and declare a source a limited hangout for not covering it but in reality they need to select. He also gets harassed by the spy agencies.
I'm suspending my judgment here. His attitude about 9/11 is damning, but he may have developed a courage now. There's a danger of us not recognizing our heroes anymore because of paranoia.
You do what you can to the best of your ability and stop expecting others to fix things for you. There are no "heroes."
I was kicked to the curb the last time Tucker Swanson reinvented himself. __ Beau Thai
That laugh tho. He gets a pass? __ Kameltoe
God bless Tucker for being turned.
thanks for posting. i knew i'd seen this somewhere, along with some print comments/quotes by Hannity about truthers.
I'm not sure, I'm assuming it's old because Ron Paul and 9/11 are being discussed.
Meanwhile, yesterday, Tucker as a guest of Redacted, told exactly about importance of WTC7 question and ability to ask that question and how he was wrong at the time.
Either something changing in some parts of MSM, like they trying to hijack some undeniable conspiracy theories to head them later in necessary direction, or we will witness how Tucker will be evantually thrown out. :)
Whatever. Tucker being from the circles of interest and occasionally speaking out some tiny but interesting bits about that circles for whatever reason is at least entertaining against the background of empty and boring regular liars of MSM. :)
Tucker, the shining example of someone who hasn't changed at all over the years. If you're going to attack someone at least pretend to understand why people are listening to the person in the first place.
Perhaps because the real conspiracy of 9/11 is that Bush let it happen. WTC7, a depository of paper records with a fuel supply for a back up generator, collapsed after being on fire for 8 hours.
Maybe you're a dumb shill who wants to deny the fact they did it?
Your username...yea, you need to do that.
Already did. I can still call out dumb shills trying to convince us the towers collapsed due to fire.
Well, it's a start. I didn't say "towers" I said WTC7.
https://nitter.nl/drandelson/status/1634598804832894977
Video D/L: https://files.catbox.moe/obxgow.mp4
He's changed his position on that completely and apologized. I saw a recent video where he was saying people should be suspicious of things like building 7 or something to that effect.
I don't have the source on hand.