If you are (temporary growth), the you are within (ongoing loss)...lack represents your choice to want more (suggested) than need offers (perceivable).
bot
Aka Robot (Latin robur, strength)...the strength of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) implies resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Ask yourself why you use the suggested term "bot" to dehumanize others? Why not express humanity within perceivable instead of trying to dehumanize others by suggestion?
free will
Suggested free will tempts one to ignore being "free will of choice". Consenting to suggested "free will" implies ignoring to both have a "choice" and having it "of" origin.
FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance)...can you describe the foundation for your choice?
You will respond
I need to adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the want/will to respond to suggested information. I write so much because I choose to draw from inspiration instead of reasoning against others about information.
You will respond with definitions
I dismantle suggested definitions, which in return helps me to resist the temptation of being a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one who willingly ignores perceivable sound for suggested words.
LACK FREE WILL AND FREE CHOICE
a) lacking implies being within an origin that offers, hence one being able to perceive abundance and lack, which further implies having free will of choice in-between abundance (growth) and lack (loss).
b) can you give me an example of having free will "without" free choice?
If you are a bot, then you lack free will.
You do not have will to break free of what you are programmed to do.
You will respond with definitions and semantics because you LACK FREE WILL AND FREE CHOICE.
You have now been blue-screened.
If you are (temporary growth), the you are within (ongoing loss)...lack represents your choice to want more (suggested) than need offers (perceivable).
Aka Robot (Latin robur, strength)...the strength of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) implies resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Ask yourself why you use the suggested term "bot" to dehumanize others? Why not express humanity within perceivable instead of trying to dehumanize others by suggestion?
Suggested free will tempts one to ignore being "free will of choice". Consenting to suggested "free will" implies ignoring to both have a "choice" and having it "of" origin.
FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance)...can you describe the foundation for your choice?
I need to adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the want/will to respond to suggested information. I write so much because I choose to draw from inspiration instead of reasoning against others about information.
I dismantle suggested definitions, which in return helps me to resist the temptation of being a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one who willingly ignores perceivable sound for suggested words.
a) lacking implies being within an origin that offers, hence one being able to perceive abundance and lack, which further implies having free will of choice in-between abundance (growth) and lack (loss).
b) can you give me an example of having free will "without" free choice?
You only get jew-screened on windows...and if you look through suggested windows, then you view the world "through the looking glass"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Through_the_Looking-Glass
Mouth to Ass or Ass to Mouth?
Most of the people I impale have shit coming out of both.. So it doesn't matter.