I’ve taken to saying, “Science is a verb, not a noun.” It’s not a thing; it’s explicitly a process. The process discovers immutable things, but it is not itself immutable.
Science is merely another ism.In a way they are a religion themselves...
a) RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew)...adapting to perceivable represents the natural bond, consenting to suggested represents being bind anew.
b) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for every religion.
c) inception towards death represents the perceivable "way" for the perceiving life within, hence wanderer (living) being bound to way (process of dying).
....unless one is a "Scientist"
"-ist" represents ones consent to suggested "-ism".
needs funding to do research
a) foundation (perceivable) represents need for RE (respond to) SEARCH (finding something)...what one can find is self discernment about being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
b) suggested currency tempts those who consent to ignore perceivable current (inception towards death). Currency tempts one to follow; being within current forces one to resist...
Unless they belong to a University...
a) UNI (one) VERSE (short division of any composition) aka one temporary division (living) of ongoing composition (process of dying).
b) belong aka BEING (temporary) within LONG (ongoing).
Science doesn't even acknowledge
Knowledge is implied in SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.]...one needs to discern perceivable (science) for self, while resisting suggested (scientism).
Suggested MATTER (form) OF (out of) FACT (effect) tempts one to ignore that matter (life) represents the effect of immaterial cause (inception towards death).
A seed doesn't make a tree...motion makes a seed grow into a tree, hence flow (loss) generating form (growth).
science today is spoken
Suggested scientism is spoken in words, SCIENCE (Latin scio, to know) represents perceivable sound, hence KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Sound flows...words are formed within flow.
to speak in certainty
Speaking implies suggesting words towards consent by choice, while certainty represents "unquestionable; that which cannot be denied"...if it cannot be denied, then why does it require consent by choice for confirmation?
Nature doesn't speak in certainty, it represents a flowing solution, for each formed problem (answer/question by choice) within.
marketing their worth
Suggestion doesn't represent worth (value); only perceivable does. The marketed suggestion aims at getting consent by those representing evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
not sharing
SHARE, noun - "a part"...nature differentiates itself from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving). Nature shares itself with you...
It has to burn
While temporary living within the ongoing process of dying...can't you feel the flowing heat dissolving your formed resistance? Try holding your breath until you can't ignore the burned offering (holocaust) anymore...
Math is not a science, it is a language for science. And as in any language you could easily tell any bullshit in it without any connection to reality. Simple as that.
But somehow modern science instead of telling the truth of reality in math language began to excercise building any possible phrases with it. So, we have what we have. Linguists compete in creating different language constructs, perfectly valid from the grammar view, but absolutely senseless. Like "Prudler is fumering shafny blumpees!" - perfectly valid, but completely senseless and describe nothing real.
I remember in math in highschool they had an equation with " i " in it. It was for imaginary number. It confused me alot seems some high math is just used to create a reality that they want it to be.
Complex numbers, consisting from imaginary and real path really are perfectly handy for calculating f.e. AC curcuits and some other things. I think your theacher was not bothered with explaining practical application of that thing, and that's all. It is very simple concept when it comes with example of real word application and represented in cartesian, polar and Euler forms.
Appreciate your answer! its far easier to understand than what i got for other equations in school. i would always ask how does this apply or how can it be used in the world , By the time i got to Imaginary numbers I stopped asking.
I’ve taken to saying, “Science is a verb, not a noun.” It’s not a thing; it’s explicitly a process. The process discovers immutable things, but it is not itself immutable.
a) RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew)...adapting to perceivable represents the natural bond, consenting to suggested represents being bind anew.
b) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for every religion.
c) inception towards death represents the perceivable "way" for the perceiving life within, hence wanderer (living) being bound to way (process of dying).
"-ist" represents ones consent to suggested "-ism".
a) foundation (perceivable) represents need for RE (respond to) SEARCH (finding something)...what one can find is self discernment about being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
b) suggested currency tempts those who consent to ignore perceivable current (inception towards death). Currency tempts one to follow; being within current forces one to resist...
a) UNI (one) VERSE (short division of any composition) aka one temporary division (living) of ongoing composition (process of dying).
b) belong aka BEING (temporary) within LONG (ongoing).
Knowledge is implied in SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.]...one needs to discern perceivable (science) for self, while resisting suggested (scientism).
Suggested MATTER (form) OF (out of) FACT (effect) tempts one to ignore that matter (life) represents the effect of immaterial cause (inception towards death).
A seed doesn't make a tree...motion makes a seed grow into a tree, hence flow (loss) generating form (growth).
Suggested scientism is spoken in words, SCIENCE (Latin scio, to know) represents perceivable sound, hence KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Sound flows...words are formed within flow.
Speaking implies suggesting words towards consent by choice, while certainty represents "unquestionable; that which cannot be denied"...if it cannot be denied, then why does it require consent by choice for confirmation?
Nature doesn't speak in certainty, it represents a flowing solution, for each formed problem (answer/question by choice) within.
Suggestion doesn't represent worth (value); only perceivable does. The marketed suggestion aims at getting consent by those representing evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
SHARE, noun - "a part"...nature differentiates itself from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving). Nature shares itself with you...
While temporary living within the ongoing process of dying...can't you feel the flowing heat dissolving your formed resistance? Try holding your breath until you can't ignore the burned offering (holocaust) anymore...
Math is not a science, it is a language for science. And as in any language you could easily tell any bullshit in it without any connection to reality. Simple as that.
But somehow modern science instead of telling the truth of reality in math language began to excercise building any possible phrases with it. So, we have what we have. Linguists compete in creating different language constructs, perfectly valid from the grammar view, but absolutely senseless. Like "Prudler is fumering shafny blumpees!" - perfectly valid, but completely senseless and describe nothing real.
I remember in math in highschool they had an equation with " i " in it. It was for imaginary number. It confused me alot seems some high math is just used to create a reality that they want it to be.
Complex numbers, consisting from imaginary and real path really are perfectly handy for calculating f.e. AC curcuits and some other things. I think your theacher was not bothered with explaining practical application of that thing, and that's all. It is very simple concept when it comes with example of real word application and represented in cartesian, polar and Euler forms.
Appreciate your answer! its far easier to understand than what i got for other equations in school. i would always ask how does this apply or how can it be used in the world , By the time i got to Imaginary numbers I stopped asking.