Possibly. No, rainbows got turned that way by those types supposedly being colourful. I doubt it was intentionally except by those allowing it thinking to tempt fates.
Until they profit more off us, by selling us we're all gonna drown. The Oceans are rising and it's gonna be a biblical existential extinction cycle. Please buy an EV and donate all the proceeds to the icecaps are melting. Every little helps melt the ice caps, so that we all can drown. I mean this is why they put the windmills in the sea, and EVs don't work in water.
It doesn't work like that I know, but try telling them it. I guess they stole the rainbow until it became a fetish of the damned, and the climate change.
There are few tales to that myth, they all vary slightly, but a pact was made, and that we globally flooded. It wasn't the first cataclysm according to other cultures, fire prior, and then water. Etc. Those origin stories are quite interesting. Many believed they could summon the destroyer, it was a god, and possibly others have since been trying.
It doesn't work like that, flood, our tectonic plates will obviously feel any increasing effects, and then we potentially cool, and have done after every bigger eruption. A global flood takes a much bigger catalyst from our sun or impact etc. Besides we are consuming far more water, drinking and depleting entire sources rapidly. No the Ocean level isn't threatening in any way today, they wouldn't keep reclaiming it. Apart from the little lie, it's all man made. Factually, more population expanding, rapidly, ants, quadrupling in less than a century, feel more weather, there are so many more of them getting hit by it.
Absolutely. Except during any periods of extremes. Not your average warming and cooling normally the result of solar activity and tectonics. How extreme can it get. That answer can be existential. Super volcano, micronova, impact.
As far as god there are too many schools on whether he was the Sun, Justice, light, life, and the leviathan, kraken, tiamut, quetzalcoatl, Satan. Some believed that Satan fell to the earth, and an above beast, a serpent, dragon, behemoth resided in the earth and brought forth great destruction. Simplified version, quick.
I don't read too much into the tales except it is obvious calamity occurred, and the stars, and cosmos influences our weather.
They all had similar origin stories, cain and abel and moses and deluge and they all had a pantheon and many based this on the cosmos. Until what do you know it became the Occult. Because of secular worship.
But you're right cycles occur influencing our planet and the weather changes bringing our seasons, and storms, and even extremes. Do we affect nature. Yes. But do we control it. No. The gods do. Hence they were worshipped. Ironically
It's just another way for TPTB to milk more money out of the citizens of earth, draw attention to a situation that is beyond human control, and distract the masses from corporations polluting and destroying habitats in the name of money.
It is all that but it's origin is known:
our government was looking for a way to keep people patriotic enough to voluntarily pay taxes, without the need for war. They got together a think tank for this.
Their answer was probably nothing else besides war will work, but if it did, it would have to be global in nature, terribly wasteful, and would work better if it had at least some truth to it.
Bam, climate change was born. Further, we can know they aren't trying to improve anything because if they were, they'd just talk about pollution. Everybody agrees pollution is bad. Can't have We the People united about anything! Divide and conquer via AGW, yet another axis of polarity.
Yes! Further, "satan consciousness" is what "Babylon" refers to in the Bible. Nimrod built it, and the tower of Babel. This is where Abram was called out from before God renamed him Abraham, Ur of the Chaldees; same principle.
I have a current post covering this in detail, but in different terms. (BoR in the title) It includes what satan has NO counterfeit for, which is important because he can counterfeit most things.
Yin and yang is the ancient idea that good and evil (Christ consciousness vs satan consciousness in your lingo here) are equal and opposite, and need to be in balance. Christianity says no, be pure instead. That idea starts in Job, and it's one of the book's major themes that's usually overlooked. Further, it's possible that yin and yang was already established and known before any of the Bible was written, and Job is the oldest book of the Bible. This would mean God smashed this idea first. Genesis 1 is about similar ideas when you understand it as the original audience did; it's about creating a temple.
"the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water. 7 But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment" 2 Peter chapter 3, from the NKJV and snipped out in case the archaic language obscures the meaning too much.
Some say the world will end in fire,
some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
to say that for destruction ice
is also great
and would suffice.
-Robert Frost
God promised to never again destroy the earth with a flood (Gen9:11), and gave us the rainbow as a sign of this promise.
The one who currently is flooding the earth, is the serpent.
Revelation 12
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood, after the woman: that he might cause her to bee caried away of the flood.
And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed vp the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make warre with the remnant of her seed, which keepe the Commaundements of God, and haue the testimony of Iesus Christ.
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life)...through the birth-channel; within current (cy) alongside (river) banks, while struggling to resist pirates (suggestion) out in the open sea (perception)...
"The flood by way of eminence, the deluge" aka form (living) inundated within flow (process of dying), hence..."bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life" (Genesis 6:17).
It's the ongoing process of dying which represents both the breath of life (inception) and the destroyer of all temporary life (death).
in that book
A suggested book "binds" those consenting to it, hence RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) representing choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
Instead of consenting to the suggested book...ask yourself out of; within where and in response to what was it written? Does nature write? Does it make suggestions? Does it bind or does it set one "free" will of choice?
If nature represents sound and those within represent instrument of choice within balance (resonance/dissonance), then sound represents the combined whole, while each instrument represents one partial within the combined whole.
Try humming (mimicry of ongoing sound); then try speaking while humming...no matter how many words you combine, you will run out of breathe within the ongoing sound. Nature doesn't combine, it sets itself apart, hence allowing the partial (perceiving) to experience the whole (perceivable).
Others suggest one to put back together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc. which tempts one to ignore apartheid (being partial within whole).
claim to not do drugs
Instead of reasoning (agreement vs disagreement) over suggested claims, ask yourself why one would use drugs? Sounds like escapism to me, hence a shirking of response-ability (free will of choice).
within where
What is easier...growing ones self discernment about "within where" one exits or blaming others for their behavior trying to question the lack of ones self discernment?
Within where do you exist? Do this question offend you? Does thinking about it feel like a struggle to you? Do you feel responsible to answer my question or do you want to shirk response-ability to question self, hence to grow self discernment about your position "within where"?
I realize you claim
If nature represents reality, then where, when, what and why does nature CLAIM, verb - "to call for; to ask or seek to obtain"?
CuomoisaMassMurderer
a) does Cuomo require others to tell him what he is?
b) does Cuomo utilize the ignorance of the consenting masses as cover for what he does?
c) if you seek agreement from those who willingly ignore how Cuomo behaves, then you transgress against their beliefs.
d) if you seek agreement from those who already perceive how Cuomo behaves, then you shape a "norm" out of seeking agreement from others, hence becoming addicted to confirmation.
This behavior of wanting confirmation from others is what allows others to setup the conflicts of reason (agreement vs disagreement) as mass murder rituals.
In short...Cuomo doesn't need to kill, he suggests those who want or not want what he suggests to kill each other over it.
What if perceiving within perceivable represents differences within sameness, and what if others tempt one to ignore this for suggested like vs dislike?
Why does social media suggests like vs dislike (upvote vs downvote) tools for interaction? Why can I use free will of choice to be different, by resisting to consent to either like or dislike?
a) what if everyone (living) within everything (process of dying) cannot posit (put into place), but only reposit (response to being put into place)?
b) what if others suggest one to deposit (state of being placed in safe-keeping), while ignoring that living within the process of dying isn't safe at all?
c) why does a bank&trust require the trust of those who deposit?
d) how about using any topic you feel comfortable in to test if I'm full of shit when adapting to it? Am I lying about what I write about? Am I pushing any noticeable agendas? Do I suggest anyone to believe what I write about?
As this represents a conspiracy forum...how do I conspire against you? Whom do I conspire with? What do I gain from conspiring against you? Do you fell offended when I point out that CON, noun (negation) contradicts SPIRE (spiro; spirit; breathing aka adaptation), while CON, verb (together, with) implies SPIRE (adaptation)?
You aren't familiar with him yet? Some claim he's a bot, but no, he's human. His sense of humor is the best proof of that, sometimes he has written stuff that's actually humorous.
Because he made a pact with Noah. It was never to flood the planet again.
Don't worry I am sure he'll get more inventive next time.
Possibly. No, rainbows got turned that way by those types supposedly being colourful. I doubt it was intentionally except by those allowing it thinking to tempt fates.
Until they profit more off us, by selling us we're all gonna drown. The Oceans are rising and it's gonna be a biblical existential extinction cycle. Please buy an EV and donate all the proceeds to the icecaps are melting. Every little helps melt the ice caps, so that we all can drown. I mean this is why they put the windmills in the sea, and EVs don't work in water.
It doesn't work like that I know, but try telling them it. I guess they stole the rainbow until it became a fetish of the damned, and the climate change.
There are few tales to that myth, they all vary slightly, but a pact was made, and that we globally flooded. It wasn't the first cataclysm according to other cultures, fire prior, and then water. Etc. Those origin stories are quite interesting. Many believed they could summon the destroyer, it was a god, and possibly others have since been trying.
It doesn't work like that, flood, our tectonic plates will obviously feel any increasing effects, and then we potentially cool, and have done after every bigger eruption. A global flood takes a much bigger catalyst from our sun or impact etc. Besides we are consuming far more water, drinking and depleting entire sources rapidly. No the Ocean level isn't threatening in any way today, they wouldn't keep reclaiming it. Apart from the little lie, it's all man made. Factually, more population expanding, rapidly, ants, quadrupling in less than a century, feel more weather, there are so many more of them getting hit by it.
God's rainbow, the REAL rainbow, has 7 colors. The faggotry "rainbow" has 6. This is absolutely intentional on their part!
7 is the number of God's perfection. 6 is the number of man, without God.
666 is ...
Absolutely. Except during any periods of extremes. Not your average warming and cooling normally the result of solar activity and tectonics. How extreme can it get. That answer can be existential. Super volcano, micronova, impact.
As far as god there are too many schools on whether he was the Sun, Justice, light, life, and the leviathan, kraken, tiamut, quetzalcoatl, Satan. Some believed that Satan fell to the earth, and an above beast, a serpent, dragon, behemoth resided in the earth and brought forth great destruction. Simplified version, quick.
I don't read too much into the tales except it is obvious calamity occurred, and the stars, and cosmos influences our weather.
They all had similar origin stories, cain and abel and moses and deluge and they all had a pantheon and many based this on the cosmos. Until what do you know it became the Occult. Because of secular worship.
But you're right cycles occur influencing our planet and the weather changes bringing our seasons, and storms, and even extremes. Do we affect nature. Yes. But do we control it. No. The gods do. Hence they were worshipped. Ironically
Excellent comment! Let me add a juicy tidbit:
It is all that but it's origin is known:
our government was looking for a way to keep people patriotic enough to voluntarily pay taxes, without the need for war. They got together a think tank for this.
Their answer was probably nothing else besides war will work, but if it did, it would have to be global in nature, terribly wasteful, and would work better if it had at least some truth to it.
Bam, climate change was born. Further, we can know they aren't trying to improve anything because if they were, they'd just talk about pollution. Everybody agrees pollution is bad. Can't have We the People united about anything! Divide and conquer via AGW, yet another axis of polarity.
Yes! Further, "satan consciousness" is what "Babylon" refers to in the Bible. Nimrod built it, and the tower of Babel. This is where Abram was called out from before God renamed him Abraham, Ur of the Chaldees; same principle.
I have a current post covering this in detail, but in different terms. (BoR in the title) It includes what satan has NO counterfeit for, which is important because he can counterfeit most things.
Yin and yang is the ancient idea that good and evil (Christ consciousness vs satan consciousness in your lingo here) are equal and opposite, and need to be in balance. Christianity says no, be pure instead. That idea starts in Job, and it's one of the book's major themes that's usually overlooked. Further, it's possible that yin and yang was already established and known before any of the Bible was written, and Job is the oldest book of the Bible. This would mean God smashed this idea first. Genesis 1 is about similar ideas when you understand it as the original audience did; it's about creating a temple.
He did not leave us to speculate about this:
"the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water. 7 But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment" 2 Peter chapter 3, from the NKJV and snipped out in case the archaic language obscures the meaning too much.
This is the point, and the OP's answer.
🌊🌈 🔥? ❄️?
A tale of fire and ice? Lol (and floods and rainbows)
Some say the world will end in fire,
some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
to say that for destruction ice
is also great
and would suffice.
-Robert Frost
He said he would use fire this time if i remember
You do
God promised to never again destroy the earth with a flood (Gen9:11), and gave us the rainbow as a sign of this promise.
The one who currently is flooding the earth, is the serpent.
Revelation 12
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood, after the woman: that he might cause her to bee caried away of the flood.
And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed vp the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make warre with the remnant of her seed, which keepe the Commaundements of God, and haue the testimony of Iesus Christ.
Very good! (Comment, not development; obviously)
Why
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life)...through the birth-channel; within current (cy) alongside (river) banks, while struggling to resist pirates (suggestion) out in the open sea (perception)...
What does this have to do with the hamburglar?
a) HAM (Greek heim, home)...ignoring perceivable allows others to burglarize it with suggestions.
b) HAM (home) BURGHER (freeman of a burgh; fortress) implies free will of choice as ones fortress.
God will have to do something.
Cuz pacifist Christians ain't gonna do sheeeeeit
because he doesn't exist and the fact that you think the world was ever flooded like it says in that book of fairy tales is weird...
What else? The Epic of Gilgamesh? Do you think Enkidu was real? The ancient Siberian myths where people survived by hanging on to trees?
Stop using the term "nothingburger"...real people don't use nonsense stupid words.
Nonsense stupid words, like CharlieBucket
Charlie Bucket got the last golden ticket to the Wonka factory. Just fyi cuz I'm helpful :o)
"The flood by way of eminence, the deluge" aka form (living) inundated within flow (process of dying), hence..."bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life" (Genesis 6:17).
It's the ongoing process of dying which represents both the breath of life (inception) and the destroyer of all temporary life (death).
A suggested book "binds" those consenting to it, hence RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) representing choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
Instead of consenting to the suggested book...ask yourself out of; within where and in response to what was it written? Does nature write? Does it make suggestions? Does it bind or does it set one "free" will of choice?
I realize you claim to not do drugs, but word combinations like you choose come from WAYYY too much acid
a) inception towards death represents the only way for life.
b) being alive implies as free will of choice within a balance (need/want) based system.
c) balancing as choice implies being on EDGE, noun [Latin acies, acus, acidus aka acid].
d) do I really make this up under the influence of drugs or do others use any excuse to keep shirking response-ability for what they ignore? https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/acid
If nature represents sound and those within represent instrument of choice within balance (resonance/dissonance), then sound represents the combined whole, while each instrument represents one partial within the combined whole.
Try humming (mimicry of ongoing sound); then try speaking while humming...no matter how many words you combine, you will run out of breathe within the ongoing sound. Nature doesn't combine, it sets itself apart, hence allowing the partial (perceiving) to experience the whole (perceivable).
Others suggest one to put back together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc. which tempts one to ignore apartheid (being partial within whole).
Instead of reasoning (agreement vs disagreement) over suggested claims, ask yourself why one would use drugs? Sounds like escapism to me, hence a shirking of response-ability (free will of choice).
What is easier...growing ones self discernment about "within where" one exits or blaming others for their behavior trying to question the lack of ones self discernment?
Within where do you exist? Do this question offend you? Does thinking about it feel like a struggle to you? Do you feel responsible to answer my question or do you want to shirk response-ability to question self, hence to grow self discernment about your position "within where"?
If nature represents reality, then where, when, what and why does nature CLAIM, verb - "to call for; to ask or seek to obtain"?
a) does Cuomo require others to tell him what he is?
b) does Cuomo utilize the ignorance of the consenting masses as cover for what he does?
c) if you seek agreement from those who willingly ignore how Cuomo behaves, then you transgress against their beliefs.
d) if you seek agreement from those who already perceive how Cuomo behaves, then you shape a "norm" out of seeking agreement from others, hence becoming addicted to confirmation.
This behavior of wanting confirmation from others is what allows others to setup the conflicts of reason (agreement vs disagreement) as mass murder rituals.
In short...Cuomo doesn't need to kill, he suggests those who want or not want what he suggests to kill each other over it.
Like I said ...
What if perceiving within perceivable represents differences within sameness, and what if others tempt one to ignore this for suggested like vs dislike?
Why does social media suggests like vs dislike (upvote vs downvote) tools for interaction? Why can I use free will of choice to be different, by resisting to consent to either like or dislike?
What if everything you posit is a bunch of shit?
a) what if everyone (living) within everything (process of dying) cannot posit (put into place), but only reposit (response to being put into place)?
b) what if others suggest one to deposit (state of being placed in safe-keeping), while ignoring that living within the process of dying isn't safe at all?
c) why does a bank&trust require the trust of those who deposit?
d) how about using any topic you feel comfortable in to test if I'm full of shit when adapting to it? Am I lying about what I write about? Am I pushing any noticeable agendas? Do I suggest anyone to believe what I write about?
As this represents a conspiracy forum...how do I conspire against you? Whom do I conspire with? What do I gain from conspiring against you? Do you fell offended when I point out that CON, noun (negation) contradicts SPIRE (spiro; spirit; breathing aka adaptation), while CON, verb (together, with) implies SPIRE (adaptation)?
https://img.gvid.tv/i/2chLV4Yt.png
what the fuck is this happy horseshit? Word salad!
You aren't familiar with him yet? Some claim he's a bot, but no, he's human. His sense of humor is the best proof of that, sometimes he has written stuff that's actually humorous.