He should
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
He should
Like I said ...
What if perceiving within perceivable represents differences within sameness, and what if others tempt one to ignore this for suggested like vs dislike?
Why does social media suggests like vs dislike (upvote vs downvote) tools for interaction? Why can I use free will of choice to be different, by resisting to consent to either like or dislike?
What if everything you posit is a bunch of shit?
a) what if everyone (living) within everything (process of dying) cannot posit (put into place), but only reposit (response to being put into place)?
b) what if others suggest one to deposit (state of being placed in safe-keeping), while ignoring that living within the process of dying isn't safe at all?
c) why does a bank&trust require the trust of those who deposit?
d) how about using any topic you feel comfortable in to test if I'm full of shit when adapting to it? Am I lying about what I write about? Am I pushing any noticeable agendas? Do I suggest anyone to believe what I write about?
As this represents a conspiracy forum...how do I conspire against you? Whom do I conspire with? What do I gain from conspiring against you? Do you fell offended when I point out that CON, noun (negation) contradicts SPIRE (spiro; spirit; breathing aka adaptation), while CON, verb (together, with) implies SPIRE (adaptation)?
https://img.gvid.tv/i/2chLV4Yt.png
I posit that your questions, suppositions, and conclusions are all horseshit.
Maybe someday you'll learn how to think straight.
Sometimes you have a good sense of humor though.