I see here quite often, lengthy discussions on how Putin is out maneuvering this, NATO doing this or that blunder, how China is to be blamed for that and how is Iran going to fight back with their latest drones etc...
The world of geopolitics is indeed interesting, and certainly there must be some genuine competition at that level. But seriously, if you believe Putin is independent and really fighting the Ukrainians or NATO, how do you explain he went along and vaccinated his people? How do you explain all the jewish oligarchs in Russia?
How do you explain Iran going full steam ahead with the covid hoax and vaccinating everyone? How do you explain their masonic parliament building?
Remember that story in the Bible where Jesus goes to the desert to fast and pray? Satan comes to test him 3 times. On the third try, he tells Jesus 'I will give you all the kingdoms of the world if you bow down and worship me'. Though Jesus obviously declines the offer, Jesus doesn't dispute satans ownership or authority. You might expect him to say, you don't have that kind of authority, but apparently Satan does have that power over all the kindoms of the world. Jesus and the apostles on multiple occasions called Satan the god (small g) of this world, or ruler of this world. My point is Satan literally runs all the kingdoms of earth, and leaders and powerful people answer to him to one degree or another. Some aethists may scoff at that but as time goes on, that is increasing the only logical explanation I see. Luckily the God of everything has already defeated him, and it's all just playing out now.
I know it's an uncomfortable topic for some, but Jesus identified at least one party allied with the devil. In John 8, Jesus was questioned by the pharisees (Jewish religious leaders), and Jesus told them that they were children of the devil, who is the father of lies, and they do as their father (i.e. they're liars, followers of the devil). In older versions of the Bible there were distinctions between the various peoples of that area. Hebrews, Israelites, and Jews were different groups of people. Modern translations of the Bible muddy the waters, because they refer to all of those different people as "jews".
The Bible also refers to ancient Canaanite Gods, one of them being Remphan. This god has other names too (I don't remember the spellings), mentioned in the Bible, that are due to mistranslations through the different languages. The Israeli flag has a 6 pointed star, and it isn't the star of David. It's the star of Remphan. Many modern Jews are, knowingly or not, worshipping Remphan. There are very strong connections of Remphan to Baal, Moloch, and Saturn, all with heavy connections to Satan. Ancient Canaanite religions involved sexual degeneracy and child sacrifice. Alex Jones found evidence for Moloch worship at Bohemian Grove. Hillary Clinton said she would make a sacrifice to Moloch in one of the Podesta emails released by Wikileaks in 2016. The pizzagate investion uncovered rampant Satan worship and iconography all over Washington D.C. and Hollywood, including blood and sexual magic/rituals, like with Marina Abramovic. The Talmud, the writings and interpretations of Old Testament laws by Jewosh leaders, also has some abhorrent teachings in it.
Are all Jews or only some? There's lots of vigorous debate on that. However, it can't be denied that Jews hold massively disproportionate representation in every single entity involved in globalism, which is pushing nothing but lies (they do as their father). The central philosophical tenet of globalists is to lie. They're antithetical to truth.
I think I agree with everything you said. I know at least part of what we are up against is 'the synagogue of satan' mentioned in revelation; "those who call themselves Jews but are not, but do lie". There are plenty of Satanists (knowing or unknowing) that do not match this description as well. And I think we agree that these false gods that were worshiped are fallen Angels. I believe the nephilim have a role as well but that's a long discussion. Demons is often used a blanket term for fallen Angels and nephilim in my understanding.
If you want to hear someone go into detail on fallen Angels and their offspring the nephilim, Rob Skiba has the best insight I've heard on the subject. People tend to use the term demon to describe both groups. Rob Skiba has a youtube channel and he can be found on sites like bitchute as well. I'm pretty sure he was killed using ventilators and remdesivir during the plandemic.
Atheists are retards, so don’t mind them. Our entire existence here is a series of tests and trials against the worldly temptations of this plane, which is under Satan’s control for now. The Bible says that Satan will lose his control, in the end, but many souls will be claimed by him for eternal damnation. Don’t be one of them.
You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble! James 2:19
I feel like most atheists are just overasserting that they haven't figured it out yet. Then also there's the professed atheists who know the truth yet lie for fun.
a) A THE IST aka one consenting to suggested THEISM.
b) both wanting (belief) and not wanting (disbelief) represents ones consent to suggested.
a) THE; definitive adjective - "is used before nouns to limit their signification, to denote a species by way of distinction; a single thing representing the whole".
b) why does suggested Pig-Latin (English) exchange CONNOTATION, noun - "implication of something beside itself inference" with THEISM?
c) does "the bible" represent male or female connotation? And what about Latin "biblia" or Greek "biblion" ?
d) BIBLION - "a book as a division of a larger work"...what if whole (process of dying) divides into partial (living) and what if whole and partial together represent the inherent/internal power of ENERGY (Greek; work)?
You have heard of Marcion/ites or Marcionism? Google it. He said what you are saying like 2000 years ago. lmao
and the dissonance in the normie brain keeps increasing
it just keeps piling on and on
but i watch the hearts of my normie friends and lately there's a mix of despair and confusion being masked up by hatred and cynicism as a mechanism of defence
He's actually talking to Yahweh.
Satan is sent by God to test Jesus in that scripture.
If you're looking for evil they never have "evil" or "Satan" on their label. Imagine Judas, Jezebel or Haman the Agatite. Those are real evil.
God can allow demons to test people, like in the book of Job. But this does not mean they aren't God's enemies. If that is your belief, it doesn't come from scripture. Genesis to revelation describes Satan as the enemy out to corrupt and destroy humanity, and try to be 'like the Most High (God).
If god controls the demons, they aren't his enemies, they are his servants.
In my opinion yes and no. They are allowed a certain amount of leeway to do as they please. We know some were sent to the abyss or "tartarus" or "sheol" (different names for the same thing). For example Jesus one saved a man who had been possessed by a legion of demons for many years. The demons recognized Jesus power as the Son of God, Lamb of God, God in human form... so they begged him not to be sent to the abyss. Jesus sent them into a herd of pigs instead. It must not have been their time for judgment.
They are allowed to do as they please within certain parameters of God's plan before they face judgment. And he can restrict them at any time like when that legion of demons was cast out.
God's enemy is those who have free will. The Canaanites and Phoenicians told us so.
The canaanites and Phoenicians worshipped false gods (demons), so they are no different than today's rulers; they have advanced knowledge, technology, power, but they are ultimately deceived. Same with all the lucifarians in Hollywood and politics.
Besides angels and fallen Angels do have free will, that's why God punishes and sometimes even imprisons them. The only difference with them is they can't be redeemed by Jesus sacrifice like humans can. They were created far superior to humans in knowledge, wisdom, and power, so they don't have the same grace we do.
However God has allowed most fallen Angels to go on doing evil for the same reason he allows humans to do so. Everyone will face judgement at some point.
This is just my interpretation of scripture.
a) free will of choice implies as reaction by each ONE (singular)...suggested "those" (plural) tempts one to ignore that.
b) FREE implies within dominance; WILL (want) implies within need; OF implies out of and CHOICE implies within balance.
c) why would others suggest "free will" without "of choice"? Could it be that one can be tricked by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to bind oneself to the choices of others, while ignoring ones own free will of choice?
What if those who adapt to perceivable sound (phonics) represent PHONETICIANS, while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, hence for the "definitions" suggested by others, represent DEAF PHOENICIANS?
CANAAN; from KANA - "to be brought into synchronicity"... https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Canaan.html
The few suggest synchronism aka e pluribus unum (out of many, one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being asynchronous (temporary growth) within synchronous (ongoing loss) aka living within the process of dying, as partial struggling to sustain self within whole.
The many consenting to follow the suggested orders of the few...each ignore being the resistance (life) within the natural order (inception toward death).
Synchrony (temporary chaos) within Asynchrony (ongoing order) aka living within the process of dying.