Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

30
From "The Talmudic View of the Universe"... (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by clemaneuverers 2 years ago by clemaneuverers +33 / -3
18 comments share
18 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (18)
sorted by:
▲ 11 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 11 points 2 years ago +12 / -1

https://academic.oup.com/book/1751/chapter-abstract/141387578?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false

This couldn't have any bearing on the persistence of FE... could it?

EDIT you can read the chapter in question at google books:

https://books.google.com/books?id=YQ1J-W6kuSkC&pg=PA27&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Questionable 4 points 2 years ago +7 / -3

Aren't you the guy who arranged to have me BANNED from The Great Awakening for posting in Flat Earth threads here? Can you not go a day without posting Flat Earth content?

What the hell man. Every Flat Earth thread I see now, is posted by YOU!!!

I almost made it an entire morning without reading about Flat Earth. Thank you for that!

/rent free

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 2 points 2 years ago +5 / -3

Moron Censorship Justification.

He think's he's "tip of the spear" on getting rid of FE. Mods gone wild.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Questionable 1 point 2 years ago +3 / -2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k85qkPiWMOU

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 1 point 2 years ago +3 / -2

GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mp693mK-Evs

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 8 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 8 points 2 years ago +10 / -2

I didn't even have any reason to quarrel with Q-Tards until they banned me for some criticism of synagogue of satan.

Count me as another Conspiracies.Win member banned from TheDonald and GreatAwakening. Getting banned from one usually leads to getting banned from the other.

At The Donald I posted some fair criticism against Trump. If the guys over there were true intellectuals then they'd engage in civil debate and be able to defend against my fair criticism of Trump without banning the one guy they need on their side more than Trump since Trump has soft hands and is unfit to mass execute these demons in skin suits.

I saw a thread at Great Awakening today about Trump planning public executions by fire squad in his second term. How deluded do you have to be to believe Trump will hold any deep state criminal accountable for anything? Jews such as Rothstein and William Barr (son of a jew and son of CIA parents) were in charge of Trump's DOJ.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– aldagautr 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Wanna know how I know Q was/is a psyop?

I didn't even have any reason to quarrel with Q-Tards until they banned me for some criticism of synagogue of satan.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– HonestTruth 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

More proof of the criminal intent to manipulate people and information.

Great post!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 2 years ago +8 / -1
▲ 6 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 6 points 2 years ago +8 / -2

Greeks: give circumference

Rabbis: take by circumcision

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ -2 ▼
– jack445566778899 -2 points 2 years ago +2 / -4

Yes, the talmudic view of the world is derived from the hebrew view of the world.

The christian biblical conception of the world is exactly the same, and for the exact same reasons (it has the same source!).

Are you one of the “christianity is a jewish con” proponents?

permalink save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– nicknightingale -2 points 2 years ago +1 / -3

lol, are you seriously trying to suggest that a few misinformed sages theorizing a flat earth in 500 CE are the force behind the contemporary Flat Earth movement? Please.

There are some rabbinical sources that support a flat earth, though they are few.

Whether or not some sages believed in the geocentric view - the sun revolving around the earth or the heliocentric view - the reverse, we still describe our evenings as “sunset”. Our perspectives are based on our assertions which is decided by looking to the horizon.

It has been noted that since antiquity, the Greeks recognized the heliocentric and not the geocentric view, which was the consensus at the time. However, since the antiquity of its history, the Church knew it was round and the size of its circumference. While most Talmudic rabbis endorsed the heliocentric view, there were some who engaged in the geocentric. Of course, the sun’s position is relative to each standing perceptive.

In Ri of Barcelona’s commentary on Sefer Yetzirah (p. 254a), he quotes Rav Saadia Gaon supporting the theory that the earth is flat. This was a minority (miktzat) opinion. Another was Rabbi Yehuda HaNassi who said the underground streams were cold because the sun traveled beneath the earth at night and that this theory seemed more correct. Some Jews believed the sun traveled above, indicating a more flat earth theory. The Lubavitcher, Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson, of Chabad wrote in a correspondence to a friend of the nonsensical notion that the sun and earth change positions based on the merits or sins of the Jews. Obviously, this nonsensical notion is ridiculed. Magic, demons, and ghost do not exist. They have never been proven and thus belong to the fabrication of the wild imagination of the mystics to support their emotional needs. Maimonides said that some ancient rabbis were little experts in the realms of science and did not always fully understood how the laws of nature worked (Guide to the Perplexed, III:14). For the rationalist, Gersonides (Ragbag), Maimonides (Rambam), and Ibn Ezra were convinced that the sun did not stand still for Joshua nor did the sun’s shadow move ten degrees backward on Hezekiah’s deathbed.

In summary, a few rabbis in the Talmud believed it was flat and some were unsure. In spite of that, the majority knew it had to be round, which was proven by modern science today.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

They weren't theorizing, they seemed to firmly believe it. Indeed the flat idea seems to be held by most of the talmud rabbis. It's the more fanciful stuff, the demons and pillars and changing in movement of sun according to sin, that seems to be in doubt by the later ones.

The Talmud has a strong influence on people even today, as does Kaballah, despite being archaic and failings in logic, reason and decency etc. Even in complex ways that are not immediately obvious. For example, Louis Pasteur may not have "discovered" his "principals of vaccination" had he, though not a Jew, not been introduced to the Talmud; wherein the rabbis recommend, to prevent onset of illness if a person is bitten by a rabid dog, to kill the dog and cut it open and cut off the tip of it's liver and feed it to that person. This set him off on the idea that injecting a person with a small amount of what he believed would make them sick, would make them immune to that particular sickness. Follow the science!

People can get very attached to the ideas of those old rabbis, or mystic ideas of Kaballah. Are you aware of the red string bracelet worn by students of Kaballah? You might be surprised at some of the people who have been photographed wearing one. If the parties attached to these ideas are people in positions of power, the ideas can filter down into society, naturally or by force, to such a degree that even reason can't seem to shift them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– nicknightingale -4 points 2 years ago +1 / -5

Of course they were theorizing; they were uneducated "mystics" with no concrete understanding of astronomy. As I'm sure a scholar such as yourself must know, the Talmud is a series of written debates and disagreements with many different opinions entangled.

Zohar Vayikra 10a unambiguously states that:

The entire world and those upon it, spin round in a circle like a ball,' both those at the bottom of the ball and those at the top. All God's creatures, wherever they live on the different parts of the ball, look different (in color, in their features) because the air is different in each place, but they stand erect as all other human beings.
Therefore there are places in the world where, when some have light, others have darkness; when some have day, others have night. There is a place in the world where the day is long and night is but a short time...

So, to suggest that this idea was held by "most of the Talmudic rabbis" is both false and irrelevant. Scientific matters recorded in the Talmud are not necessarily concrete religious traditions meant to be upheld by future generations, but merely a reflection of the contemporary beliefs of the time. Additionally, like all religious texts, much of the language is couched in metaphor, which leaves it open to a deeper, poetic intepretation.

As for your other irrelevant insinuations, I'm not particularly interested in following those superstitions down into some discursive wormhole.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

The quote you found is from The Zohar, not the Talmud.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zohar

The Zohar was first publicized by Moses de León (c. 1240 – 1305 CE), who claimed it was a Tannaitic work recording the teachings of Simeon ben Yochai[b] (c. 100 CE). This claim is universally rejected by modern scholars, most of whom believe de León, also an infamous forger of Geonic material, wrote the book himself between 1280 and 1286.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– nicknightingale -3 points 2 years ago +1 / -4

My mistake, got my religious texts mixed up. My point still stands and this site provides a clear and interesting breakdown of the differing opinions of the time.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy