Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

11
What do you guys think of "Directed Energy Weapons" on 9/11? (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by Webspawner3 2 years ago by Webspawner3 +16 / -5
26 comments share
26 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– Webspawner3 [S] 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

For awhile I have been aware of the truth about 9/11. However, just recently I have discovered Judy Wood and her presentations about Directed Energy Weapons. What do you guys think or know about this topic?

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

I don't believe it.

I believe planes did hit the towers. Whether or not there were explosives inside assisting the implosion, or if it was a controlled demolition, I don't know.

What are the explanations for the Larry Fink "pull it" comments? Misquoted or out of context or true? The whole building 7 thing is suspicious.

When guys start talking about inter-dimensional energy and the tower disappearing in a portal or some shit, that's a bit outside of my ability to grasp and a bit too sci-fi even for me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +5 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– dukey 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Fake and gay. No one has even proved such technology even exists .. 20 years later. Imagine the amount of energy you would need to blow up a building and turn it to dust like that. You are talking absolutely massive amounts of energy. WTC7 collapsed from the bottom like a conventional demolition ..

Judy Woods is either a crackpot or a deliberate dis-info shill.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

There were pics of burned up cars in that book. Cars with melted chrome. Like they were in paradise ca. Like they were in that chinese factory that obummer did.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– dukey 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Have you never seen what happens when cars catch on fire lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1

Right. Cars always catch on fire during building collapses.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dukey 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

If a building collapsed that had gas or oil etc it would probably also set off some fires. Just because fires happened doesn't mean it's evidence of laser beams from space that can vaporize entire buildings. Common sense should indicate this theory is simply ridiculous.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I'm just saying that there were rows of cars nearby, in the book, that were melted.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dukey 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I know I've seen the pics. If a car catches fire it will also burn adjacent cars.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Cars on the ground caught fire because of..? Jet fuel 1000 ft up? These pictures were of melted uncrushed cars ground level. I'm not arguing, I just find it interesting.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 0 ▼
– Dwing84 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Look at everything surrounding the cars. There are trees right next to them. Green leaves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Primate98 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Judy Wood is disnfo of a particular sort. I believe that she just started out with good intentions and the wrong idea and therefore got support from "Them". I detect from her behavior that she's now aware of this situation, but will never correct herself because her career will collapse into dust if she does.

As direct evidence, she denies that there was any excess heat at the site. I guess she missed the pools of molten metal, fires that would not go out, and melted shoes.

Look up the work of Dimitri Khalezov and Heinz Pommer for a very full account of the nuclear destruction.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I think it's bullshit to distract from the real conspiracy, which is that Bush let it happen.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– xolotltlaloc 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Judy Wood is a piece of shit CIA disinformation agent.

The only "DEW"s on 9/11 were demolition nukes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Webspawner3 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Interesting. Can you elaborate? Do you support her claim of “where did the towers go”. The lack of debris is thought provoking.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– xolotltlaloc 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Interesting. Can you elaborate?

I agree with her observations.

Do you support her claim of “where did the towers go”. The lack of debris is thought provoking.

a demolition nuke would (also) accomplish everything she observes.

Judy simply dismisses nukes w/o a shred of evidence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Shouldn't the bottom of this pile been red? 3000 people are carrying a lot of liquid, aren't they? Did they ever find blood? Maybe blown paper should of shown this?

WHERE DID THE BLOOD GO?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Allas8 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

I remember that New York City cleared most of the debris by the next day. They did not want to have it laying there as a monument of failure. Also most of the city was covered in a layer of dust, from everything that had been pulverised by the weight of the towers as they came down.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– DOOMERSLAYER 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

I remember that New York City cleared most of the debris by the next day.

Were you a little kid back then because in reality it took a long time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Remember the crickets? Those things that bleeped, what for a day or two afterwards that the firefighters all had on?

I wonder how the force that dustified a building, didn't dustify these things?

Just pondering. You would think these devices should of been squished flat.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Webspawner3 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

NYC most certainly did NOT clear most of the debris by the next day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Allas8 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Fine. The debris of the Two Towers collapsing, was cleared out over many weeks, happy?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– nukemehard -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

That book is the besr money you will ever spend. It will satisfy you. The phoros in it are undeniable and out of control.

Dont read assholes talking about qhat the woman "believes" there is no opinion in the book and its the greatest purchase of my life.

All the materials are free on the net and even having all the torrents with her I still buy this for my friends every now and then.

Absolute discussion ender.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy