As ridiculous as FE seems, prima facie, until it's proven false, I keep my mind open to plausible explanations for why:
A) the moon landings were all fake and we've never "been back"
B) there are no actual photos of the entire earth from space (unless you believe the sizes of the continents are changing by 30-60% every decade or so)
C) the only people on earth that we give billions of dollars to, to go to space, are faking any, let alone much (or all) of the footage, using green screens, parabolic "zero gravity" flights, actual hair spray to make their hair stand up, underwater studios (unless you believe in air bubbles in space)
You might say "but these items have better explanations than FE". Well let's hear those theories also. Let's not shoot down those who are proposing an outlandish, yet mostly comprehensive, theory, one that explains these anomalies as well as a plethora of others, like how did they use radio frequencies that don't even purportedly bounce off the ionosphere to communicate hundreds of miles during WWII, how can the horizon be seen above an item whose entirety should be hidden behind it, why is Antarctica, aside from a tiny portion, entirely off limits to most civilians, how was Felix Baumgartner able to slowly float up to nearly 30 miles without drifting a thousand or more miles because of the earth's rotation, etc.
Suggestions that these things are not even worthy of discussion, on a forum dedicated to conspiracy theories, have to be disingenuous.
Original Research
Let's not also forget that FE researchers are literally the only conspiracy theorists doing original research. These people will buy lasers that cost thousands of dollars, cameras, etc., and go to some large body of water (large lakes, bays, etc.) where they can test their hypothesis with an actual experiment. Everything else I see on here is pure speculation, or videos of interviews involving various professionals with dubious backstories (Malone, etc.).
Does it Matter
Pertaining the "would it even matter" argument, you honestly don't need a lukewarm IQ to imagine how much it would matter, if FE was real.
Principles
Most of us are here because we couldn't speak freely elsewhere, because "hate has no place on our platform" type communist bullshit. Now we're going to make the same kind of rules, especially banning arbitrary content that is desired by a clear majority, on a platform with already-existing mechanisms for getting rid of low quality postd (downvoting, hiding)? If FE posts are banned, this place is no better than TGA, and don't even pretend to be pro constitution when you can't even stand up for free speech about a conspiracy theory in a conspiracy theory forum.
I'm out of here, for good, if FE is banned. Aside from spam, illegal, doxxing, banning has no place on our platform.
Whereas:
The term Conspiracy Theory was allegedly coined by the CIA in order to denigrate those who question the official narrative.
Therefore:
The idea of Flat Earth, I allege, is used also in order to denigrate those who associate with conspiracy theories, to dilute the quality of information here, to waste the time of those who question the official narrative.
in my opinion this is the best arguments for banning flat earth for sure. I don't believe it's origins are sincere in the least. nevertheless I have had the misfortune of meeting real people in the wild who actually believe it.
whether an idea is true or not, IMO, is less import than the ability to consider if the idea is true or not.
The first is believing based on being told. The second is self discovery.
A computer is accurate, but not wise.
That said, I agree that the more silly/obtuse conspiracy theory's are used to denigrate those more "serious" one, but the solution to that isn't to censor them, but to expose all theory to the rigorous examination.
Every single FE “proof” you could ever point to was debunked over a decade ago. Elsewhere.
There is no conspiracy.
The Great Pyramid is a scale model of the Northern Hemisphere
You are missing the point I think, respectfully.
Allow me to explain. When teaching kids how to "debate", the first thing you do is give them a topic that they feel passionately about one way or another. You let them argue the point they believe in, and after that is done you make they argue the counter point.
You do that, not to make them think something that they don't(as is the suggested worry here), but to make them think in a manner unusual to them, to entertain ideas not previously entertained, and to make them argue from a position they dont believe in - so they are free from their own personal biases.
THAT, imo, is the important part. Whether FE is true or not is not as important, as people exploring and confronting their own bias. Whether it is FE, or the JFK thing, or 911, or 911, or 711, or Aliens, or Reptilian overlords, or whatever..
Anyway, just my 2 cents.
Post iq, npc retard.
Very good. c/FlatEarthResearch exists, and is run by a guy who's serious, knowledgeable, and passionate about the topic. Doesn't it make sense to have those discussions there?
kek. one jew praises the other jew
Post iq, npc retard.
Post iq, npc retard.