Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

3
()
posted 2 years ago by BuckeyePatr1ot 2 years ago by BuckeyePatr1ot +4 / -1
17 comments share
17 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (17)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– Tacoking 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

All I'll say about this is I was about 10 when I saw some internet titties for the first time, and to this day, I like them just as much as I did then. Nothing quite as magical as experiencing the wonder for the first time though. Ahh, good memories.

And these motherfuckers want to take that away

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AI_ML_Expert 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Did u graduate to hookers yet or are you still jerking off 24/7?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 3 ▼
– NippleSalad 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Ads and user data are far more profitable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Umm more porn than fish today. More porn than gas today. What are you subscribing too. Your fetish. They probably cost extra. Nope, more porn than fish.

Subscription doesn't work. Nobody needs it. It is a bullshit profile that shouldn't exist.

Children need parental locks. If people cared about children they'd make a different Internet for them. Or limit their usage of the internet. It could even be done, as an andriod thing something domain. Although it doesn't work. Children meet older children. But it would be like any other thing for children.

No I.D needed. Just a safer Internet for just kids. At what point today? I've suggested it for years and the only thing they got is child locks. Yawn. Hell there's revenue off the catered devices. Phones, tablets, Pcs, TVs. Routes to childproof domains. Instead of a bunch of other locks.

What they got is Google for everybody and it simple puts some crap lock on. It works until they find a different search button.

Instead what that dickhead is suggesting is everybody else gets profiled because of the kids. Porn, is hardly that risk either, with kids. It's a bunch of other content as well.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Ep0ch 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Make kiddie Internet. So simple. But they don't want smart. They want children corrupted. At what point wasn't there kiddie only devices and a kiddie only Internet domain. Revenue, nope not it. Because they just want to police everything more.

At what point didn't they make a closed network like at the uni or school. If they were clever it would connect by specific device. Devices only sold for children. When they reg it's a child.

Oh no. Dumb locks. Dumbest locks.

Digital I.D nope. The device gets registered like any other dumbphone now. It links into a clean domain. You know your child can't get screwed? Umm umm.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Yep, I remember that Internet. The bandwidth trolled.

And the reason they don't is a bunch of shitty toys from China. Not quite, but the advertising if they sanitised it, would kill off a bunch of crap targeting kids. Besides they never did it to begin with. It's an alien concept. Imagine running it through the shit they got now. Practically needs new platforms for them social media, you tube, etc.

It would give it far more national control on that content. On those services paying no tax.

But it would stop this topic's crappy debates on how to police the rest of the Internet. Now, any children are in no real danger.

Distinctly the locks don't work. They're bypassed on that many corresponding searches by running their hands over the keyboard. It needs another means and connection. Digital I.D, nope. It polices everybody else for no reason.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Whatsupwithdat 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Solution is easy: all adult shit goes on a .xxx address. Then it's VERY EASY to block XXX addresses from your router or devices.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Whatsupwithdat 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

why? Everything is through ICANN. They can remove your site from DNS registries in 5 minutes. Then, unless you have the IP address, your computer won't take you there. AND if you have an entire domain blocked, they can't get to those dns anyways.

It would cost $0. System already in place.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ -1 ▼
– FishyMan420 -1 points 2 years ago +2 / -3

This is the responsibility of the parents, not the government.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy