I said Brittney was a male.
But it was something I said in the comments section that got me banned.
Here is a link reddit sent me to the reported content:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/zhtn5u/brittney_griner_is_a_male/iznw038/
spoiler: the content has been deleted. so... basically they banned me for something I said, but won't show me what it was that triggered the ban.
unfortunately, i have no memory of what i said in that specific post.
is this a feature or a bug? :D
ohhh nice!
thank you!
hahaha... banned for calling a man a man.
i don't feel so bad now.
cheers
Lol I saw that YT short from Kali that showed her on the plane back from RU. The only reason I find it hard to believe is because if she was a dude she'd be able to dunk. Literally can get above the rim and still fails to dunk with 0 pressure while fucking around for publicity tick tocks.
I'm a dude, and I can't dunk.
he's a dude, too...
calling a man a "woman" because he can't dunk is a bit misogynistic, don't you think ? :) lol
Did you read the rest of what I said? It can literally get above the rim which is the real hurdle to dunking (no pun intended). The second requirement is having good hands which it does not. That wasn't on the court with other shitters that can't dunk while on live television for dozens of lesbians. It was while shooting random tick tocks during practice...
So my question is can you get above the rim? I sure as fuck can't, but if I could I'd be able to dunk lol.
that makes you a real man ;)
Yeah but you're not a pro ball player.
Haha based
I went on Reddit, that specific subreddit, for the first time in years, recently. I was appalled at how terrible everything there was, so much worse than when I left, and when I left it was already bad.
Utter degeneracy and filth.
The fact it took you until 2022 to get banned from Reddit makes you suspect.
nah - didn't mean to imply this was the first time ;)
Samesys
IDK how it compares, but I think almost everything I post over there is shadowbanned, with a small amount allowed but deboosted.
I still post anyway, like ice-cold seawater trying to seep into their hermetically sealed social media submarine.
Like that time The Titanic tried to break an iceberg
You'd be surprised to find out the truth behind that. I sure was.
I was banned forever
i mean yea, i have been banned forever like 6 times. this was just the most recent account, and i thought it was funny that they would not let me see the content for which i got banned.
sopped wasting so much time there when i was IP banned or whatecer they did.
If you post an actual conspiracy over there, you will be permabanned.
I was locked out of Twitter for 2 weeks for doing the same.
I tweeted that Griner is a man and transgenderism is a mental illness.
In our world today telling the truth will get one ostracized, canceled.
Twitter claimed my tweet was hate speech and inciting violence.
It is apparent transgenderism is an exceptionally protected subclass of humans.
https://www.animascorp.com/is-brittney-griner-transsexual/#
https://sportsjone.com/brittney-griner-deep-voice-is-transgender-voice-is-a-male-or-female/
Factually is, dunno how they have kids if she was born with penis? Either fake news site or something is wrong. It also says she has no breasts. Guess her Husband is girl?
Wasn't she going to go to a Russian Men's prison prompting the exchange? Originally majority female.
adoption?
But isn't there courts on it? Break up or something status relating to the kids. Who did the IVF what's those registered birth certificates? Do they record the donor. Kids have rights to request it.
Don't care. It's 100% odd. Adam's apple. No tits. That size. Her story of being the man in a something body. Narrative of just a lesbian.
She could've had that defect. It exists in multi millions to 1. They operated. Then was always a girl is the half truth.
Who knows. I'll leave it there. Don't want to get involved in this. It is what it is. It's not my business. But it's a handicap on other basketball players competing. They can deal with it.
Well the whole point of casting such a massively wide net as "conspiracy" is to make it all collectively incoherent, much like this place, it can still be fun but something doesn't gain public merit until it's a topic unto itself, like a sub dedicated to 1 conspiracy in particular, this is why nonewnormal with a narrow focus on "covid" was not allowed but it IS okay to post skepticism about covid in "conspiracy" next to posts from flat earthers and lizard people, obviously very deliberate of course, here on win you can easily see the difference in quality between a sub like this and the nonewnormal on win, the source quality and maturity in discussion both go way up when there is a specific focus