It is not hard to believe Jews are perverts. There is an entire body of evidence and it consistently holds true.
It is not hard to believe Jews sexualize children. They openly do this through Disney and literally have transsexuals stripping in front of children conducting sexual strip dances targeting children. It was revealed that Jew "doctors" are performing genital mutilation inside the United States. Evidence was shared here on this website.
The Jewish Pride Fund funds LGBTQ parades and events and on their own website they have marketing that targets children, even babies with LGBTQ themed souvenirs and toys and books.
Mark Dice was showing us subliminal messaging in commercials, music videos and half time shows over 10 fucking years ago. Why are people still unconvinced after a decade of review, supplemental evidence, and overt propaganda?
You don't EVER spend millions, let alone hundreds of thousands of dollars on a campaign
First of all, you wrote that backwards.
Secondly, yes you do. You must not understand how corporations work. There is often little oversight and, when there is, it's often a bunch of people who don't care. Middle managers are worthless and they are the "oversight."
A lot of these things are hidden. A court document, a address to a doctor's office with a hilarious name, etc. These things wouldn't be caught by any sort of "oversight." Even when there is oversight, it's not a pixel by pixel analysis. It's a quick look over and a rubberstamp.
So you think they put a teddy bear in bondage gear, prominently displayed in an ad, because absolutely no one vetted it?
I can see your argument for something subtle, like obscure book titles, but how far does thay extend? We're talking about marketing, an art where the shade of a colour in a logo is debated due to how it could affect the human psyche, and then trademarked, but you think they just let ads through without a second glance?
Even if Hanlon's Razor applies here (and I'm not sure if it does), someone (probably someones) clearly put these subtle hints in there, and they all lead back to pedophiles.
Generally, people have a blind trust of government and corporate management. We are brainwashed from very young age to "listen to our teacher" and "respect the principal" and "police are here to help you" and to respect people in lab coats and such.
Many of these people don't believe in spirits or religion. It's hard to believe people could be so evil when they don't believe in a spirit of evil.
Yet somehow they believe Trump is devil incarnate or Nazis were the worst most evil people who ever lived. When Anderson take it up the pooper Cooper is interviewing Stormy Daniels and the creepy porn lawyer on CNN everyday for two years straight they get brainwashed easy. If bottom boy faggots like Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon told BringTheCat789 that some pervert old billionaire jew is peddling pedophilia then he'd believe it. But instead only "alt-right" non-jew news sites publish the evidence. Plus Snopes said it isn't true. LOL
It stands to reason that the gross, but obvious, shit was vetted. But the more subtle stuff could have been put in by one person and not directly approved.
Or it was directly approved... as a viral marketing campaign.
I'm not saying it's not evil and disgusting. I'm just saying it's probably not a global sex cabal deciding to come out of the closet to the world like you guys seem to believe.
While I see some merit in what you say, I keep asking myself "So I am expected to believe that this address was on some random piece of paper that they just so happened to throw on the table that was going to be photographed for a multimillion-dollar ad campaign and the address just so happens to connect to someone named Epstein?".
Really, I have lost my ability to simply accept randomness.
For those and many other factors just in this ad campaign, the odds that all of this just randomly aligned is incalculable. For distraction or for messaging, this was all set up this way for a reason...
Never once did I say it was random. Someone clearly did it intentionally. The question is who that person was, who else knew about it, and, most importantly, why they did it.
So you are admitting that pedophile propaganda can easily be released through corporation without much oversight?
Also, what makes you think the "oversight" aren't a bunch of pervert jews themselves? Or what makes you believe that this marketing campaign was a bottom-up idea through the corporate organization and not top-down?
I don't believe that Jews would conspire to mass inject people with poison under the guise of a fraudulent pandemic in which 99.9% of people survive if they do nothing and just go on with their lives. Nor would they utilize mass censorship and collude with governments and corporations to implement a multi-billion marketing scheme to brainwash subjects into voluntarily taking the poison. Nor would they use threats such as terminating your employment unless you agree to getting injected with said poison.
All of those things have actual motive. Moreover, I believe there are two types of conspiracies:
Where things are set in motion and loosely guided by those in power. But a crucial part of propaganda is the general public accepting it and spreading it in their own forms. Not everyone who spreads propaganda is "in on it." The vast majority aren't.
Where something happens, and then those in power control the narrative around it. We see this a lot, for example, with shootings. I don't believe many shootings are explicitly staged. It's far easier to wait for a shootings to happen, then broadcast the ones that fit your narrative and suppress the ones that don't.
It's about creating an image of refinement, class, elegance, culture and superiority to the "common" man of pedophiles.
We are supposed to look at this and say "The people wearing these clothes are rich and famous and better than us. We should try to emulate them".
Ostensibly, it's about selling clothes. But these people holding sway in fashion and art largely are, and always have been, pedophiles. That's why "high" art has been totally arbitrary and devoid of technical skill since the 60s, when this stuff really kicked off. It's not about the works, it's about membership.
The fact that they are openly putting these symbols in their ads, alongside the growing MAP movement and a general culture of permissiveness and anti-natalism, suggests that they think the people are prepared to accept the abuse and exploitation of children, as they have always done.
I don't think it has anything to do with karma, or fear of reprecussions.
The point of Satanism isn't evil for it's own sake, it's the subversion of free will.
God gave Man free will, in the hopes that Man would inevitably turn to good.
Lucifer, in his pride, opposes God and asserts that Man will fall to evil. He doesn't win by doing evil or forcing Man to do evil; he wins when Men, by their own will, do evil.
The satanists are trying to glamourize degeneracy and abuse, that's pretty obvious. What isn't is the full extent of their infiltration into our societies.
Whoever made this ad is a massive lone troll. Or this is an intentional viral marketing campaign.
I don't buy that the company put this in there in order to send a message to their fellow cult members or whatever you guys think.
It is not hard to believe Jews are perverts. There is an entire body of evidence and it consistently holds true.
It is not hard to believe Jews sexualize children. They openly do this through Disney and literally have transsexuals stripping in front of children conducting sexual strip dances targeting children. It was revealed that Jew "doctors" are performing genital mutilation inside the United States. Evidence was shared here on this website.
The Jewish Pride Fund funds LGBTQ parades and events and on their own website they have marketing that targets children, even babies with LGBTQ themed souvenirs and toys and books.
Mark Dice was showing us subliminal messaging in commercials, music videos and half time shows over 10 fucking years ago. Why are people still unconvinced after a decade of review, supplemental evidence, and overt propaganda?
First of all, you wrote that backwards.
Secondly, yes you do. You must not understand how corporations work. There is often little oversight and, when there is, it's often a bunch of people who don't care. Middle managers are worthless and they are the "oversight."
A lot of these things are hidden. A court document, a address to a doctor's office with a hilarious name, etc. These things wouldn't be caught by any sort of "oversight." Even when there is oversight, it's not a pixel by pixel analysis. It's a quick look over and a rubberstamp.
So you think they put a teddy bear in bondage gear, prominently displayed in an ad, because absolutely no one vetted it?
I can see your argument for something subtle, like obscure book titles, but how far does thay extend? We're talking about marketing, an art where the shade of a colour in a logo is debated due to how it could affect the human psyche, and then trademarked, but you think they just let ads through without a second glance?
Even if Hanlon's Razor applies here (and I'm not sure if it does), someone (probably someones) clearly put these subtle hints in there, and they all lead back to pedophiles.
Why is that?
He's in denial.
Generally, people have a blind trust of government and corporate management. We are brainwashed from very young age to "listen to our teacher" and "respect the principal" and "police are here to help you" and to respect people in lab coats and such.
Many of these people don't believe in spirits or religion. It's hard to believe people could be so evil when they don't believe in a spirit of evil.
Yet somehow they believe Trump is devil incarnate or Nazis were the worst most evil people who ever lived. When Anderson take it up the pooper Cooper is interviewing Stormy Daniels and the creepy porn lawyer on CNN everyday for two years straight they get brainwashed easy. If bottom boy faggots like Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon told BringTheCat789 that some pervert old billionaire jew is peddling pedophilia then he'd believe it. But instead only "alt-right" non-jew news sites publish the evidence. Plus Snopes said it isn't true. LOL
It seems like a viral marketing campaign to me.
It stands to reason that the gross, but obvious, shit was vetted. But the more subtle stuff could have been put in by one person and not directly approved.
Or it was directly approved... as a viral marketing campaign.
I'm not saying it's not evil and disgusting. I'm just saying it's probably not a global sex cabal deciding to come out of the closet to the world like you guys seem to believe.
While I see some merit in what you say, I keep asking myself "So I am expected to believe that this address was on some random piece of paper that they just so happened to throw on the table that was going to be photographed for a multimillion-dollar ad campaign and the address just so happens to connect to someone named Epstein?".
Really, I have lost my ability to simply accept randomness.
For those and many other factors just in this ad campaign, the odds that all of this just randomly aligned is incalculable. For distraction or for messaging, this was all set up this way for a reason...
Never once did I say it was random. Someone clearly did it intentionally. The question is who that person was, who else knew about it, and, most importantly, why they did it.
Only an evil spirit could bring it all together.
So you are admitting that pedophile propaganda can easily be released through corporation without much oversight?
Also, what makes you think the "oversight" aren't a bunch of pervert jews themselves? Or what makes you believe that this marketing campaign was a bottom-up idea through the corporate organization and not top-down?
Yes.
I don't believe that Jews would conspire to mass inject people with poison under the guise of a fraudulent pandemic in which 99.9% of people survive if they do nothing and just go on with their lives. Nor would they utilize mass censorship and collude with governments and corporations to implement a multi-billion marketing scheme to brainwash subjects into voluntarily taking the poison. Nor would they use threats such as terminating your employment unless you agree to getting injected with said poison.
Oh, wait....
All of those things have actual motive. Moreover, I believe there are two types of conspiracies:
Where things are set in motion and loosely guided by those in power. But a crucial part of propaganda is the general public accepting it and spreading it in their own forms. Not everyone who spreads propaganda is "in on it." The vast majority aren't.
Where something happens, and then those in power control the narrative around it. We see this a lot, for example, with shootings. I don't believe many shootings are explicitly staged. It's far easier to wait for a shootings to happen, then broadcast the ones that fit your narrative and suppress the ones that don't.
Why do you think the people "in power" have direct oversight over Balenciaga ad campaigns?
Do you really think they are constantly keeping tabs on that?
It's about creating an image of refinement, class, elegance, culture and superiority to the "common" man of pedophiles.
We are supposed to look at this and say "The people wearing these clothes are rich and famous and better than us. We should try to emulate them".
Ostensibly, it's about selling clothes. But these people holding sway in fashion and art largely are, and always have been, pedophiles. That's why "high" art has been totally arbitrary and devoid of technical skill since the 60s, when this stuff really kicked off. It's not about the works, it's about membership.
The fact that they are openly putting these symbols in their ads, alongside the growing MAP movement and a general culture of permissiveness and anti-natalism, suggests that they think the people are prepared to accept the abuse and exploitation of children, as they have always done.
I don't think it has anything to do with karma, or fear of reprecussions.
The point of Satanism isn't evil for it's own sake, it's the subversion of free will.
God gave Man free will, in the hopes that Man would inevitably turn to good.
Lucifer, in his pride, opposes God and asserts that Man will fall to evil. He doesn't win by doing evil or forcing Man to do evil; he wins when Men, by their own will, do evil.
The satanists are trying to glamourize degeneracy and abuse, that's pretty obvious. What isn't is the full extent of their infiltration into our societies.
I don't buy that shit. That's not real.
Yes, I agree and accept that people are raping kids and murdering them.
The part that doesn't make sense is for the people raping and murdering kids to create an ad with a bunch of weird easter eggs exposing themselves.